All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx masking/unmasking
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:48:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f2b77a5-e2a8-71a5-1b32-3ca2944cad28@socionext.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee9nb94s.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

Thank you for your comment.

On 2021/09/17 22:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:30:52 +0100,
> Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gentle ping, are there any comments about this series?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> On 2021/08/30 11:22, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>>> This series includes some fixes to INTx masking/unmasking for UniPhier PCIe
>>> host controller driver.
>>>
>>> - Remove unnecessary bit clears to INTX mask field
>>> - Remove unnecessary irq_ack() function because write access to status field
>>>     doesn't work
>>> - Add lock into callback functions to avoid race condition
>>>
>>> Kunihiko Hayashi (2):
>>>     PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx mask/unmask bit operation and remove ack
>>>       function
>>>     PCI: uniphier: Serialize INTx masking/unmasking
>>>
>>>    drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
>>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
> 
> Patches look OK, although I would personally squash them into a single
> one (INTx masking never really worked before that). FWIW:

Surely applying only the first patch leaves the issue with the second one.
I'll squash them in v3.

Thank you,

> 
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> 
> 	N,
> 

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx masking/unmasking
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:48:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f2b77a5-e2a8-71a5-1b32-3ca2944cad28@socionext.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee9nb94s.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

Thank you for your comment.

On 2021/09/17 22:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:30:52 +0100,
> Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gentle ping, are there any comments about this series?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> On 2021/08/30 11:22, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>>> This series includes some fixes to INTx masking/unmasking for UniPhier PCIe
>>> host controller driver.
>>>
>>> - Remove unnecessary bit clears to INTX mask field
>>> - Remove unnecessary irq_ack() function because write access to status field
>>>     doesn't work
>>> - Add lock into callback functions to avoid race condition
>>>
>>> Kunihiko Hayashi (2):
>>>     PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx mask/unmask bit operation and remove ack
>>>       function
>>>     PCI: uniphier: Serialize INTx masking/unmasking
>>>
>>>    drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
>>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
> 
> Patches look OK, although I would personally squash them into a single
> one (INTx masking never really worked before that). FWIW:

Surely applying only the first patch leaves the issue with the second one.
I'll squash them in v3.

Thank you,

> 
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> 
> 	N,
> 

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-30  2:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx masking/unmasking Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-30  2:22 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-30  2:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx mask/unmask bit operation and remove ack function Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-30  2:22   ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-30 15:59   ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-30 15:59     ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-30  2:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: uniphier: Serialize INTx masking/unmasking Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-30  2:22   ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-09-16 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix " Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-09-16 11:30   ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-09-17 13:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-17 13:54     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-17 23:48     ` Kunihiko Hayashi [this message]
2021-09-17 23:48       ` Kunihiko Hayashi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8f2b77a5-e2a8-71a5-1b32-3ca2944cad28@socionext.com \
    --to=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.