From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Tova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] nl80211/cfg80211: fix potential infinite loop
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:08:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <923bdb745be04732ee451b8d1b78b3d915b54b16.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201029222407.390218-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 22:24 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The for-loop iterates with a u8 loop counter and compares this
> with the loop upper limit of request->n_ssids which is an int type.
> There is a potential infinite loop if n_ssids is larger than the
> u8 loop counter, so fix this by making the loop counter an int.
Makes sense, thanks. I'll apply it to next.
For the record, it shouldn't be possible for request->n_ssids to be
larger than what the driver limit was, and that's 20 by default and
doesn't make sense to be really much higher than that, so in practice
this won't happen.
johannes
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Tova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] nl80211/cfg80211: fix potential infinite loop
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:08:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <923bdb745be04732ee451b8d1b78b3d915b54b16.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201029222407.390218-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 22:24 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The for-loop iterates with a u8 loop counter and compares this
> with the loop upper limit of request->n_ssids which is an int type.
> There is a potential infinite loop if n_ssids is larger than the
> u8 loop counter, so fix this by making the loop counter an int.
Makes sense, thanks. I'll apply it to next.
For the record, it shouldn't be possible for request->n_ssids to be
larger than what the driver limit was, and that's 20 by default and
doesn't make sense to be really much higher than that, so in practice
this won't happen.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-30 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 22:24 [PATCH][next] nl80211/cfg80211: fix potential infinite loop Colin King
2020-10-30 9:08 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2020-10-30 9:08 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=923bdb745be04732ee451b8d1b78b3d915b54b16.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tova.mussai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.