All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <ffrederick@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@users.sf.net>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION PATCH] fbdev: fbmem: behave better with small rotated displays and many CPUs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:33:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94947dad-2ac4-99b0-3ebd-0aba62f27d4a@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8faae5c6-ce11-99b4-4fc7-7a8925aad3e4@axentia.se>

On 11/26/2018 03:16 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Ping?!

Hi,

Thank you for your patch, it will be considered for 4.21 (as it is not
a recent regression + I'm busy with other things currently).

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

> Cheers,
> Peter
> 
> On 2018-11-08 10:54, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Blitting an image with "negative" offsets is not working since there
>> is no clipping. It hopefully just crashes. For the bootup logo, there
>> is protection so that blitting does not happen as the image is drawn
>> further and further to the right (ROTATE_UR) or further and further
>> down (ROTATE_CW). There is however no protection when drawing in the
>> opposite directions (ROTATE_UD and ROTATE_CCW).
>>
>> Add back this protection.
>>
>> The regression is 20-odd years old but the mindless warning-killing
>> mentality displayed in commit 34bdb666f4b2 ("fbdev: fbmem: remove
>> positive test on unsigned values") is also to blame, methinks.
>>
>> Fixes: 448d479747b8 ("fbdev: fb_do_show_logo() updates")
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
>> ---
>>  drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 8 ++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
>> index bb7f5f23e347..1abeb0b72455 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
>> @@ -435,7 +435,9 @@ static void fb_do_show_logo(struct fb_info *info, struct fb_image *image,
>>  			image->dx += image->width + 8;
>>  		}
>>  	} else if (rotate == FB_ROTATE_UD) {
>> -		for (x = 0; x < num; x++) {
>> +		u32 dx = image->dx;
>> +
>> +		for (x = 0; x < num && image->dx <= dx; x++) {
>>  			info->fbops->fb_imageblit(info, image);
>>  			image->dx -= image->width + 8;
>>  		}
>> @@ -447,7 +449,9 @@ static void fb_do_show_logo(struct fb_info *info, struct fb_image *image,
>>  			image->dy += image->height + 8;
>>  		}
>>  	} else if (rotate == FB_ROTATE_CCW) {
>> -		for (x = 0; x < num; x++) {
>> +		u32 dy = image->dy;
>> +
>> +		for (x = 0; x < num && image->dy <= dy; x++) {
>>  			info->fbops->fb_imageblit(info, image);
>>  			image->dy -= image->height + 8;
>>  		}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <ffrederick@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@users.sf.net>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION PATCH] fbdev: fbmem: behave better with small rotated displays and many CPUs
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:33:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94947dad-2ac4-99b0-3ebd-0aba62f27d4a@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8faae5c6-ce11-99b4-4fc7-7a8925aad3e4@axentia.se>

On 11/26/2018 03:16 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Ping?!

Hi,

Thank you for your patch, it will be considered for 4.21 (as it is not
a recent regression + I'm busy with other things currently).

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

> Cheers,
> Peter
> 
> On 2018-11-08 10:54, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Blitting an image with "negative" offsets is not working since there
>> is no clipping. It hopefully just crashes. For the bootup logo, there
>> is protection so that blitting does not happen as the image is drawn
>> further and further to the right (ROTATE_UR) or further and further
>> down (ROTATE_CW). There is however no protection when drawing in the
>> opposite directions (ROTATE_UD and ROTATE_CCW).
>>
>> Add back this protection.
>>
>> The regression is 20-odd years old but the mindless warning-killing
>> mentality displayed in commit 34bdb666f4b2 ("fbdev: fbmem: remove
>> positive test on unsigned values") is also to blame, methinks.
>>
>> Fixes: 448d479747b8 ("fbdev: fb_do_show_logo() updates")
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
>> ---
>>  drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 8 ++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
>> index bb7f5f23e347..1abeb0b72455 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
>> @@ -435,7 +435,9 @@ static void fb_do_show_logo(struct fb_info *info, struct fb_image *image,
>>  			image->dx += image->width + 8;
>>  		}
>>  	} else if (rotate = FB_ROTATE_UD) {
>> -		for (x = 0; x < num; x++) {
>> +		u32 dx = image->dx;
>> +
>> +		for (x = 0; x < num && image->dx <= dx; x++) {
>>  			info->fbops->fb_imageblit(info, image);
>>  			image->dx -= image->width + 8;
>>  		}
>> @@ -447,7 +449,9 @@ static void fb_do_show_logo(struct fb_info *info, struct fb_image *image,
>>  			image->dy += image->height + 8;
>>  		}
>>  	} else if (rotate = FB_ROTATE_CCW) {
>> -		for (x = 0; x < num; x++) {
>> +		u32 dy = image->dy;
>> +
>> +		for (x = 0; x < num && image->dy <= dy; x++) {
>>  			info->fbops->fb_imageblit(info, image);
>>  			image->dy -= image->height + 8;
>>  		}

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08  9:54 [REGRESSION PATCH] fbdev: fbmem: behave better with small rotated displays and many CPUs Peter Rosin
2018-11-08  9:54 ` Peter Rosin
2018-11-26 14:16 ` Peter Rosin
2018-11-26 14:16   ` Peter Rosin
2018-11-26 14:33   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2018-11-26 14:33     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-11-26 21:19     ` Peter Rosin
2018-11-26 21:19       ` Peter Rosin
2018-12-20 16:49       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-12-20 16:49         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94947dad-2ac4-99b0-3ebd-0aba62f27d4a@samsung.com \
    --to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ffrederick@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=jsimmons@users.sf.net \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.