From: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:31:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9879ca3f-548a-25d4-78f0-f307e1189231@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpeguzdPV13LhXFL0U_bfKcpOHQCvg2wfxF6ryksp==tjVWA@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/24/21 10:30 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 4:09 PM Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made
>>> virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below.
>>
>> Hi Miklos,
>>
>> Has this patch been queued?
>
> It's in my internal patch queue at the moment. Will push to
> fuse.git#for-next in a couple of days.
Cool! Thank you :-)
Connor
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:31:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9879ca3f-548a-25d4-78f0-f307e1189231@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpeguzdPV13LhXFL0U_bfKcpOHQCvg2wfxF6ryksp==tjVWA@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/24/21 10:30 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 4:09 PM Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made
>>> virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below.
>>
>> Hi Miklos,
>>
>> Has this patch been queued?
>
> It's in my internal patch queue at the moment. Will push to
> fuse.git#for-next in a couple of days.
Cool! Thank you :-)
Connor
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:31:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9879ca3f-548a-25d4-78f0-f307e1189231@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpeguzdPV13LhXFL0U_bfKcpOHQCvg2wfxF6ryksp==tjVWA@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/24/21 10:30 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 4:09 PM Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/18/21 10:17 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> I removed the conditional compilation and renamed the limit. Also made
>>> virtio_fs_get_tree() bail out if it hit the WARN_ON(). Updated patch below.
>>
>> Hi Miklos,
>>
>> Has this patch been queued?
>
> It's in my internal patch queue at the moment. Will push to
> fuse.git#for-next in a couple of days.
Cool! Thank you :-)
Connor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 13:52 [PATCH 0/3] virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size Connor Kuehl
2021-03-18 13:52 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] virtio_ring: always warn when descriptor chain exceeds queue size Connor Kuehl
2021-03-18 13:52 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-22 3:22 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-22 3:22 ` [Virtio-fs] " Jason Wang
2021-03-22 3:22 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-22 3:41 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-22 8:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-22 8:17 ` [Virtio-fs] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-22 8:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-23 2:38 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-23 2:38 ` [Virtio-fs] " Jason Wang
2021-03-23 2:38 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: split requests that exceed virtqueue size Connor Kuehl
2021-03-18 13:52 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-18 15:17 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-03-18 15:17 ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-03-18 15:52 ` Connor Kuehl
2021-03-18 15:52 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-20 20:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-20 20:04 ` [Virtio-fs] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-20 20:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-22 19:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-03-22 19:01 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-03-22 19:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-03-24 15:09 ` Connor Kuehl
2021-03-24 15:09 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-24 15:09 ` Connor Kuehl
2021-03-24 15:30 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-03-24 15:30 ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-03-24 15:31 ` Connor Kuehl [this message]
2021-03-24 15:31 ` Connor Kuehl
2021-03-24 15:31 ` Connor Kuehl
2021-03-19 13:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-03-19 13:49 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-03-19 13:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-03-19 14:16 ` Connor Kuehl
2021-03-19 14:16 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-19 14:16 ` Connor Kuehl
2021-03-22 15:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-22 15:47 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-22 15:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] fuse: fix typo for fuse_conn.max_pages comment Connor Kuehl
2021-03-18 13:52 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-22 3:42 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-22 3:42 ` [Virtio-fs] " Jason Wang
2021-03-22 3:42 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9879ca3f-548a-25d4-78f0-f307e1189231@redhat.com \
--to=ckuehl@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.