All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: abhinavk@codeaurora.org
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, robdclark@gmail.com,
	seanpaul@chromium.org, swboyd@chromium.org,
	nganji@codeaurora.org, aravindh@codeaurora.org,
	khsieh@codeaurora.org, daniel@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/msm: add support to take dpu snapshot
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:10:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc72aa631d0d902bb6c381137aa7f51@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b087fd6f-9307-d31a-ee21-75e5adf8a20b@linaro.org>

Hi Dmitry

Thanks for the review.

On 2021-04-14 17:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 15/04/2021 02:11, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Add the msm_disp_snapshot module which adds supports to dump dpu
>> registers and capture the drm atomic state which can be used in
>> case of error conditions.
>> 
>> changes in v4:
>>   - rename dpu_dbg to msm_disp_snapshot and move it to msm/disp
>>   - start using a list of blocks to store the hardware block 
>> information
>>   - cleanup block allocation and freeing logic to simplify it
>> 
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile                      |   2 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h    |   2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c           |  61 ++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h           |   5 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c      | 161 
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h      | 167 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c | 181 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c               |  12 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h               |   4 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c               |  29 ++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h               |   1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c                     |   5 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h                     |   4 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c                |  19 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c                     |  29 +++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h                     |   2 +
> 
> Generic suggestion: Could you please split this patch, separating core
> snapshotting functionality, dpu1, dsi and dp changes? This would ease
> reviewing.

Core snapshotting functionality does include calling into the individual 
driver's snapshot function.
So the diffstat which you are seeing in the dpu1/dsi and dp are just 
their snapshotting functions and nothing else.

> 
>>   16 files changed, 682 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>> index 610d630..65d86ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ msm-y := \
>>   	disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.o \
>>   	disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.o \
>>   	disp/dpu1/dpu_vbif.o \
>> +	disp/msm_disp_snapshot.o \
>> +	disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.o \
> 
> If snapshotting is going to be used by dsi/dp, what about landing it
> into the top drivers/gpu/drm/msm dir? This way we'd point that it is a
> generic piece of code shared between all drm/msm drivers.

I dont have a strong preference of drm/msm Vs drm/msm/disp. I just put 
them here
based on Rob's comment on the prev patchset 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/427690/?series=82942&rev=3

> 
>>   	msm_atomic.o \
>>   	msm_atomic_tracepoints.o \
>>   	msm_debugfs.o \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> index 4dfd8a2..0f9f0a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020 The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>>    */
>>     #ifndef _DPU_HW_CATALOG_H
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> index 88e9cc3..7529566 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> @@ -798,6 +798,67 @@ static void dpu_irq_uninstall(struct msm_kms 
>> *kms)
>>   	dpu_core_irq_uninstall(dpu_kms);
>>   }
>>   +void dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(struct drm_device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct dpu_mdss_cfg *cat;
>> +	struct dpu_hw_mdp *top;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +
>> +	priv = dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +	disp_state = dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +
>> +	cat = dpu_kms->catalog;
>> +	top = dpu_kms->hw_mdp;
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
>> +
>> +	/* dump CTL sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->ctl_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "ctl_%d", i);
> 
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "ctl_%d", i);
> (the same bellow)
Rob just mentioned to me on IRC to move this snprintf inside 
msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(). I am planning to do that in the next 
patchset.
With that will fix this too.
> 
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->ctl[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->ctl[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump DSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->dspp_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "dspp_%d", i);
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->dspp[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->dspp[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump INTF sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->intf_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "intf_%d", i);
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->intf[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->intf[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump PP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->pingpong_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "ping-pong_%d", i);
> 
> Just a nitpick: we usually call it pp or pingpong, without dash.

Sure I will fix this.

> 
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->pingpong[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->pingpong[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump SSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "sspp_%d", i);
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->sspp[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->sspp[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	snprintf(name, SZ_128, "top");
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, top->hw.length,
>> +			dpu_kms->mmio + top->hw.blk_off);
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct msm_kms_funcs kms_funcs = {
>>   	.hw_init         = dpu_kms_hw_init,
>>   	.irq_preinstall  = dpu_irq_preinstall,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>> index d6717d6..74b6ce6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>>     #include "msm_drv.h"
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>   #include "msm_kms.h"
>>   #include "msm_mmu.h"
>>   #include "msm_gem.h"
>> @@ -132,6 +133,8 @@ struct dpu_kms {
>>     	struct opp_table *opp_table;
>>   +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>>   	struct dss_module_power mp;
>>     	/* reference count bandwidth requests, so we know when we can
>> @@ -265,4 +268,6 @@ void dpu_kms_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder 
>> *encoder);
>>    */
>>   u64 dpu_kms_get_clk_rate(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms, char *clock_name);
>>   +void dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(struct drm_device *dev);
>> +
>>   #endif /* __dpu_kms_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..1bdad16
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"[drm:%s:%d] " fmt, __func__, __LINE__
>> +
>> +#include "msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
>> +static ssize_t disp_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>> +		size_t count, void *data, size_t datalen)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_print_iterator iter;
>> +	struct drm_printer p;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	disp_state = data;
>> +
>> +	iter.data = buffer;
>> +	iter.offset = 0;
>> +	iter.start = offset;
>> +	iter.remain = count;
>> +
>> +	p = drm_coredump_printer(&iter);
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_state_print(disp_state, &p, MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_COREDUMP);
>> +
>> +	return count - iter.remain;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void disp_devcoredump_free(void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	disp_state = data;
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_state_free(disp_state);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->coredump_pending = false;
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP */
>> +
>> +static void _msm_disp_snapshot_work(struct kthread_work *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state = container_of(work, struct 
>> msm_disp_state, dump_work);
>> +	struct drm_printer p;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state(disp_state);
>> +
>> +	if (MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_DUMP_IN_CONSOLE) {
>> +		p = drm_info_printer(disp_state->drm_dev->dev);
>> +		msm_disp_state_print(disp_state, &p, MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_LOG);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * if devcoredump is not defined free the state immediately
>> +	 * otherwise it will be freed in the free handler.
>> +	 */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
>> +	dev_coredumpm(disp_state->dev, THIS_MODULE, disp_state, 0, 
>> GFP_KERNEL,
>> +			disp_devcoredump_read, disp_devcoredump_free);
>> +	disp_state->coredump_pending = true;
>> +#else
>> +	msm_disp_state_free(disp_state);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_state(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!drm_dev) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
> 
> If we are outside of disp/dpu1, we shouldn't reference dpu_kms
> internals. Probably this can be changed to use msm_drm_private,
> msm_kms or msm_mdss?
This was originally within dpu1 but based on Rob's comment I moved it to 
disp.
Since this is a debug module I thought its okay to reference it here. 
Its not
modifying anything which will impact the current dpu state.
If there is a strong preference for this, sure I can move it to 
msm_drm_private.
> 
>> +	disp_state = dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!disp_state) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * if there is a coredump pending return immediately till dump
>> +	 * if read by userspace or timeout happens
> 
> Where do we handle the timeout? Stale comment or did I miss something?
The timeout happens in the devcoredump driver and it calls the free() 
from there.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/base/devcoredump.c#L304

> 
>> +	 */
>> +	if (disp_state->coredump_pending) {
>> +		DRM_DEBUG("coredump is pending read\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kthread_queue_work(disp_state->dump_worker,
>> +			&disp_state->dump_work);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int msm_disp_snapshot_init(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!drm_dev) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +
>> +	disp_state = devm_kzalloc(drm_dev->dev, sizeof(struct 
>> msm_disp_state), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +	mutex_init(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->dev = drm_dev->dev;
>> +	disp_state->drm_dev = drm_dev;
>> +
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&disp_state->blocks);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->dump_worker = kthread_create_worker(0, "%s", 
>> "disp_snapshot");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(disp_state->dump_worker))
>> +		DRM_ERROR("failed to create disp state task\n");
>> +
>> +	kthread_init_work(&disp_state->dump_work, _msm_disp_snapshot_work);
>> +
>> +	dpu_kms->disp_state = disp_state;
> 
> Judging from this code, I think it should be possible to push
> disp_state directly into struct msm_drm_private.
Again no strong preference here. I just kept it in dpu_kms based on a 
discussion with Rob.
We can move it to msm_drm_private too if there is a strong preference to 
do so.
> 
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_destroy(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!drm_dev) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +	disp_state = dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (disp_state->dump_worker)
>> +		kthread_destroy_worker(disp_state->dump_worker);
>> +
>> +	list_del(&disp_state->blocks);
>> +
>> +	mutex_destroy(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..0ccb7e7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_H_
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_H_
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
>> +#include "../../../drm_crtc_internal.h"
>> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/list_sort.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>> +#include <linux/devcoredump.h>
>> +#include <stdarg.h>
>> +#include "dpu_hw_catalog.h"
>> +#include "dpu_kms.h"
>> +#include "dsi.h"
>> +
>> +enum msm_disp_snapshot_dump_flag {
>> +	MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_LOG = BIT(0),
>> +	MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM = BIT(1),
>> +	MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_COREDUMP = BIT(2),
> 
> Are they mutually exclusive or can they be specified in parallel?
They are mutually exclusive
> 
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_MAX_BLKS		10
>> +
>> +/* debug option to print the registers in logs */
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_DUMP_IN_CONSOLE 0
>> +
>> +/* print debug ranges in groups of 4 u32s */
>> +#define REG_DUMP_ALIGN		16
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct msm_disp_state - structure to store current dpu state
>> + * @dev: device pointer
>> + * @drm_dev: drm device pointer
>> + * @mutex: mutex to serialize access to serialze dumps, debugfs 
>> access
>> + * @coredump_pending: coredump is pending read from userspace
>> + * @atomic_state: atomic state duplicated at the time of the error
>> + * @dump_worker: kworker thread which runs the dump work
>> + * @dump_work: kwork which dumps the registers and drm state
>> + * @timestamp: timestamp at which the coredump was captured
>> + */
>> +struct msm_disp_state {
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +	struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> +	struct mutex mutex;
>> +
>> +	bool coredump_pending;
>> +
>> +	struct list_head blocks;
>> +
>> +	struct drm_atomic_state *atomic_state;
>> +
>> +	struct kthread_worker *dump_worker;
>> +	struct kthread_work dump_work;
>> +	ktime_t timestamp;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct msm_disp_state_block - structure to store each hardware 
>> block state
>> + * @name: name of the block
>> + * @drm_dev: handle to the linked list head
>> + * @size: size of the register space of this hardware block
>> + * @state: array holding the register dump of this hardware block
>> + * @base_addr: starting address of this hardware block's register 
>> space
>> + */
>> +struct msm_disp_state_block {
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +	struct list_head node;
>> +	unsigned int size;
>> +	u32 *state;
>> +	void __iomem *base_addr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT - trigger to dump the display snapshot
>> + * @drm_dev:	handle to drm device
>> + */
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT(drm_dev) msm_disp_snapshot_state(drm_dev)
> 
> Why do you need it?
Not really needed now, I can just call into msm_disp_snapshot_state() 
instead
> 
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_init - initialize global sde debug facilities: 
>> evtlog, regdump
> 
> Just a nitpick here and below: there is no sde in the upstream. And no 
> evtlog.
Sorry this is a stale comment, I thought I got rid of this, will fix 
this.
> 
>> + * @drm_dev:	drm device handle
>> + *
>> + * Returns:		0 or -ERROR
>> + */
>> +int msm_disp_snapshot_init(struct drm_device *drm_dev);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_destroy - destroy the global sde debug 
>> facilities
>> + * @drm_dev:    drm device handle
>> + *
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_destroy(struct drm_device *drm_dev);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_state - trigger to dump the display snapshot
>> + * @drm_dev:	handle to drm device
>> +
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_state(struct drm_device *drm_dev);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_state_get - get the handle to msm_disp_state struct from 
>> the drm device
>> + * @drm:	    handle to drm device
>> +
>> + * Returns:	handle to the msm_disp_state struct
>> + */
>> +struct msm_disp_state *msm_disp_state_get(struct drm_device *drm);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_state_print - print out the current dpu state
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to drm device
>> + * @p:	    handle to drm printer
>> + * @reg_dump_method: tells whether the state has to be dumped in log 
>> or coredump
>> + *
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_state_print(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, struct 
>> drm_printer *p,
>> +		u8 reg_dump_method);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state - utility to capture atomic state 
>> and hw registers
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to msm_disp_state struct
>> +
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state(struct msm_disp_state 
>> *disp_state);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_state_free - free the memory after the coredump has been 
>> read
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to struct msm_disp_state
>> +
>> + * Returns: none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_state_free(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_add_block - add a hardware block with its 
>> register dump
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to struct msm_disp_state
>> + * @name:           name of the hardware block
>> + * @len:            size of the register space of the hardware block
>> + * @base_addr:      starting address of the register space of the 
>> hardware block
>> + *
>> + * Returns: none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, 
>> char *name, u32 len,
>> +		void __iomem *base_addr);
>> +
>> +#endif /* MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..383f225
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"[drm:%s:%d] " fmt, __func__, __LINE__
>> +
>> +#include "msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>> +
>> +static void msm_disp_state_dump_regs(u32 **reg, u32 len, void __iomem 
>> *base_addr,
>> +		u32 dump_op, struct drm_printer *p)
>> +{
>> +	u32 len_aligned, len_padded;
>> +	u32 x0, x4, x8, xc;
>> +	void __iomem *addr;
>> +	u32 *dump_addr = NULL;
>> +	void __iomem *end_addr;
>> +	int i;
>> +	bool in_drm_printer = false;
>> +
>> +	len_aligned = (len + REG_DUMP_ALIGN - 1) / REG_DUMP_ALIGN;
>> +	len_padded = len_aligned * REG_DUMP_ALIGN;
>> +
>> +	addr = base_addr;
>> +	end_addr = base_addr + len;
>> +
>> +	if ((dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_COREDUMP) ||
>> +		(dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_LOG))
>> +		in_drm_printer = true;
>> +
>> +	if (in_drm_printer && !p) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid drm printer\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM && !(*reg))
>> +		*reg = kzalloc(len_padded, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +	if (*reg)
>> +		dump_addr = *reg;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < len_aligned; i++) {
>> +		if (dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM) {
>> +			x0 = (addr < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0x0) : 0;
>> +			x4 = (addr + 0x4 < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0x4) : 0;
>> +			x8 = (addr + 0x8 < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0x8) : 0;
>> +			xc = (addr + 0xc < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0xc) : 0;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (dump_addr) {
>> +			if (dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM) {
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4] = x0;
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4 + 1] = x4;
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4 + 2] = x8;
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4 + 3] = xc;
>> +			} else if (in_drm_printer) {
>> +				drm_printf(p, "0x%lx : %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
>> +						(unsigned long)(addr - base_addr),
>> +						dump_addr[i * 4], dump_addr[i * 4 + 1],
>> +						dump_addr[i * 4 + 2], dump_addr[i * 4 + 3]);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		addr += REG_DUMP_ALIGN;
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> I'd just split this function into two different cases, IN_MEM and 
> DRM_PRINTER.
I wanted to utilize the common loop here, if it will make it more clear 
I can just have two functions.
But it will duplicate a lot of code.
> 
>> +
>> +struct msm_disp_state *msm_disp_state_get(struct drm_device *drm)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +
>> +	priv = drm->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +
>> +	return dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_state_print(struct msm_disp_state *state, struct 
>> drm_printer *p,
>> +		u8 reg_dump_method)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state_block *block, *tmp;
>> +
>> +	if (!p) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid drm printer\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	drm_printf(p, "---\n");
>> +
>> +	drm_printf(p, "module: " KBUILD_MODNAME "\n");
>> +	drm_printf(p, "dpu devcoredump\n");
>> +	drm_printf(p, "timestamp %lld\n", ktime_to_ns(state->timestamp));
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(block, tmp, &state->blocks, node) {
>> +		drm_printf(p, "====================%s================\n", 
>> block->name);
>> +		msm_disp_state_dump_regs(&block->state, block->size, 
>> block->base_addr,
>> +				reg_dump_method, p);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	drm_printf(p, "===================dpu drm state================\n");
>> +
>> +	if (state->atomic_state)
>> +		drm_atomic_print_new_state(state->atomic_state, p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void msm_disp_capture_atomic_state(struct msm_disp_state 
>> *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_device *ddev;
>> +	struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
>> +
>> +	disp_state->timestamp = ktime_get();
>> +
>> +	ddev = disp_state->drm_dev;
>> +
>> +	drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx, 0);
>> +
>> +	while (drm_modeset_lock_all_ctx(ddev, &ctx) != 0)
>> +		drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->atomic_state = drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(ddev,
>> +			&ctx);
>> +	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
>> +	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state(struct msm_disp_state 
>> *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> +
>> +	drm_dev = disp_state->drm_dev;
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_capture_atomic_state(disp_state);
>> +
>> +	if (priv->dp)
>> +		msm_dp_snapshot(priv->dp);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dsi); i++) {
>> +		if (!priv->dsi[i])
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		msm_dsi_snapshot(priv->dsi[i]);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(drm_dev);
> 
> Hmm, I now see why do you need the dpu_kms. Can we have a check for
> the mdp version here? The rest of the code seems generic enough, so we
> can at least dump the dsi/dp (and hopefully eDP/HDMI) data for MDP4/5.
> 
> Ideally subdrivers should be able to report back to the core, which
> regions are available, so that we won't have this static code. But
> this might look like an overkill. Not to mention that it might lead to
> the not-so-static sequence of dumps. (As you can judge, I quite liked
> the previous approach, when the drivers registered the dumping regions
> and then the dumper would go through them.)
> 
> Let's have the static config in place with the version check.
Yes, I can have a DPU check here.
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_state_free(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state_block *block, *tmp;
>> +
>> +	if (disp_state->atomic_state) {
>> +		drm_atomic_state_put(disp_state->atomic_state);
>> +		disp_state->atomic_state = NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(block, tmp, &disp_state->blocks, node) {
>> +		kfree(block->state);
>> +		list_del(&block->node);
> 
> I'd swap these two lines, so while the block is in the list, its state
> is coherent.
Ok, will fix this.
> 
>> +		kfree(block);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, 
>> char *name, u32 len,
>> +		void __iomem *base_addr)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state_block *new_blk;
>> +
>> +	new_blk = kzalloc(sizeof(struct msm_disp_state_block), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +	strscpy(new_blk->name, name, sizeof(new_blk->name));
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_blk->node);
>> +	new_blk->size = len;
>> +	new_blk->base_addr = base_addr;
>> +	msm_disp_state_dump_regs(&new_blk->state, len, base_addr,
>> +			MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM, NULL);
>> +	list_add(&new_blk->node, &disp_state->blocks);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>> index b1a9b1b..ce8d19a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>> @@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ struct dp_catalog_private {
>>   	u8 aux_lut_cfg_index[PHY_AUX_CFG_MAX];
>>   };
>>   +void dp_catalog_snapshot(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog, struct 
>> msm_disp_state *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct dp_catalog_private *catalog = container_of(dp_catalog,
>> +			struct dp_catalog_private, dp_catalog);
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +
>> +	snprintf(name, SZ_128, "dp_ctrl");
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, 
>> catalog->io->dp_controller.len,
>> +			catalog->io->dp_controller.base);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline u32 dp_read_aux(struct dp_catalog_private *catalog, 
>> u32 offset)
>>   {
>>   	offset += MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_AUX_OFFSET;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h
>> index 176a902..e7e8b13 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_modes.h>
>>     #include "dp_parser.h"
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>     /* interrupts */
>>   #define DP_INTR_HPD		BIT(0)
>> @@ -71,6 +72,9 @@ struct dp_catalog {
>>   	u32 audio_data;
>>   };
>>   +/* Debug module */
>> +void dp_catalog_snapshot(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog, struct 
>> msm_disp_state *disp_state);
>> +
>>   /* AUX APIs */
>>   u32 dp_catalog_aux_read_data(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog);
>>   int dp_catalog_aux_write_data(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index 5a39da6..6670558 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -1009,6 +1009,35 @@ int dp_display_get_test_bpp(struct msm_dp *dp)
>>   		dp_display->link->test_video.test_bit_depth);
>>   }
>>   +void msm_dp_snapshot(struct msm_dp *dp)
>> +{
>> +	struct dp_display_private *dp_display;
>> +	struct drm_device *drm;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	dp_display = container_of(dp, struct dp_display_private, 
>> dp_display);
>> +	drm = dp->drm_dev;
>> +	disp_state = msm_disp_state_get(drm);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * if we are reading registers we need the link clocks to be on
>> +	 * however till DP cable is connected this will not happen as we
>> +	 * do not know the resolution to power up with. Hence check the
>> +	 * power_on status before dumping DP registers to avoid crash due
>> +	 * to unclocked access
>> +	 */
>> +	mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>> +
>> +	if (!dp->power_on) {
>> +		mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dp_catalog_snapshot(dp_display->catalog, disp_state);
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void dp_display_config_hpd(struct dp_display_private *dp)
>>   {
>>   diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
>> index 6092ba1..4d39373 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>>     #include "dp_panel.h"
>>   #include <sound/hdmi-codec.h>
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>     struct msm_dp {
>>   	struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> index 62704885..bccc006 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> @@ -266,3 +266,8 @@ int msm_dsi_modeset_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi, 
>> struct drm_device *dev,
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   +void msm_dsi_snapshot(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
>> +{
>> +	msm_dsi_host_snapshot(msm_dsi->host);
>> +}
>> +
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> index 7abfeab..bb39403 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
>>     #include "msm_drv.h"
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>     #define DSI_0	0
>>   #define DSI_1	1
>> @@ -90,6 +91,8 @@ static inline bool msm_dsi_device_connected(struct 
>> msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
>>   	return msm_dsi->panel || msm_dsi->external_bridge;
>>   }
>>   +void msm_dsi_snapshot(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi);
>> +
>>   struct drm_encoder *msm_dsi_get_encoder(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi);
>>     /* dsi host */
>> @@ -146,6 +149,7 @@ int dsi_clk_init_v2(struct msm_dsi_host 
>> *msm_host);
>>   int dsi_clk_init_6g_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>>   int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool 
>> is_dual_dsi);
>>   int dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool 
>> is_dual_dsi);
>> +void msm_dsi_host_snapshot(struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
>>     /* dsi phy */
>>   struct msm_dsi_phy;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> index 8a10e43..d9fdc07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> @@ -2487,3 +2487,22 @@ struct drm_bridge 
>> *msm_dsi_host_get_bridge(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
>>     	return of_drm_find_bridge(msm_host->device_node);
>>   }
>> +
>> +void msm_dsi_host_snapshot(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host = to_msm_dsi_host(host);
>> +	struct drm_device *dev = msm_host->dev;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +
>> +	disp_state = msm_disp_state_get(dev);
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&msm_host->pdev->dev);
>> +
>> +	snprintf(name, SZ_128, "dsi%d_ctrl", msm_host->id);
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, 
>> msm_iomap_size(msm_host->pdev, "dsi_ctrl"),
> 
> You can store the size into the msm_host, rather than querrying it on 
> each dump.

We need to query the base address anyway so it wont lead to much saving.

> 
>> +			msm_host->ctrl_base);
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(&msm_host->pdev->dev);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> index e1104d2..ebf9283 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>   /*
>> - * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>> rights reserved.
>>    * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat
>>    * Author: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
>>    */
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_of.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_vblank.h>
>>   +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>   #include "msm_drv.h"
>>   #include "msm_debugfs.h"
>>   #include "msm_fence.h"
>> @@ -167,6 +168,24 @@ void __iomem *msm_ioremap_quiet(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev, const char *name,
>>   	return _msm_ioremap(pdev, name, dbgname, true);
>>   }
>>   +unsigned long msm_iomap_size(struct platform_device *pdev, const 
>> char *name)
>> +{
>> +	struct resource *res;
>> +
>> +	if (name)
>> +		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, name);
>> +	else
>> +		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> +
>> +	if (!res) {
>> +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "failed to get memory resource: %s\n",
>> +				name);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return resource_size(res);
>> +}
>> +
>>   void msm_writel(u32 data, void __iomem *addr)
>>   {
>>   	if (reglog)
>> @@ -278,6 +297,8 @@ static int msm_drm_uninit(struct device *dev)
>>   		msm_fbdev_free(ddev);
>>   #endif
>>   +	msm_disp_snapshot_destroy(ddev);
>> +
>>   	drm_mode_config_cleanup(ddev);
>>     	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>> @@ -550,6 +571,12 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const 
>> struct drm_driver *drv)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto err_msm_uninit;
>>   +	if (get_mdp_ver(pdev) == KMS_DPU) {
>> +		ret = msm_disp_snapshot_init(ddev);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "msm_disp_snapshot_init failed ret = %d\n", 
>> ret);
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> Let's get it out of if (KMS_DPU), even if we do not dump mdp4/mdp5
> registers for now.
since its stored inside dpu_kms right now, we need to have this DPU 
check.
If we agree on moving this out of dpu_kms then this check can be 
relaxed. But another issue
is I dont have a non-DPU_KMS board to verify this to see if it will 
break.
So at the moment, I am restricting this to it.

> 
>>   	drm_mode_config_reset(ddev);
>>     #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>> index 2668941..9c40bac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>> @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ void msm_dp_display_mode_set(struct msm_dp *dp, 
>> struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>>   				struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>>   				struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode);
>>   void msm_dp_irq_postinstall(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
>> +void msm_dp_snapshot(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
>>     void msm_dp_debugfs_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct 
>> drm_minor *minor);
>>   @@ -450,6 +451,7 @@ void __iomem *msm_ioremap(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev, const char *name,
>>   		const char *dbgname);
>>   void __iomem *msm_ioremap_quiet(struct platform_device *pdev, const 
>> char *name,
>>   		const char *dbgname);
>> +unsigned long msm_iomap_size(struct platform_device *pdev, const char 
>> *name);
>>   void msm_writel(u32 data, void __iomem *addr);
>>   u32 msm_readl(const void __iomem *addr);
>>   void msm_rmw(void __iomem *addr, u32 mask, u32 or);
>> 

Thanks

Abhinav

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: abhinavk@codeaurora.org
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	swboyd@chromium.org, khsieh@codeaurora.org,
	seanpaul@chromium.org, aravindh@codeaurora.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/msm: add support to take dpu snapshot
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:10:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc72aa631d0d902bb6c381137aa7f51@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b087fd6f-9307-d31a-ee21-75e5adf8a20b@linaro.org>

Hi Dmitry

Thanks for the review.

On 2021-04-14 17:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 15/04/2021 02:11, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Add the msm_disp_snapshot module which adds supports to dump dpu
>> registers and capture the drm atomic state which can be used in
>> case of error conditions.
>> 
>> changes in v4:
>>   - rename dpu_dbg to msm_disp_snapshot and move it to msm/disp
>>   - start using a list of blocks to store the hardware block 
>> information
>>   - cleanup block allocation and freeing logic to simplify it
>> 
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile                      |   2 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h    |   2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c           |  61 ++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h           |   5 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c      | 161 
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h      | 167 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c | 181 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c               |  12 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h               |   4 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c               |  29 ++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h               |   1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c                     |   5 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h                     |   4 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c                |  19 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c                     |  29 +++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h                     |   2 +
> 
> Generic suggestion: Could you please split this patch, separating core
> snapshotting functionality, dpu1, dsi and dp changes? This would ease
> reviewing.

Core snapshotting functionality does include calling into the individual 
driver's snapshot function.
So the diffstat which you are seeing in the dpu1/dsi and dp are just 
their snapshotting functions and nothing else.

> 
>>   16 files changed, 682 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>> index 610d630..65d86ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ msm-y := \
>>   	disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.o \
>>   	disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.o \
>>   	disp/dpu1/dpu_vbif.o \
>> +	disp/msm_disp_snapshot.o \
>> +	disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.o \
> 
> If snapshotting is going to be used by dsi/dp, what about landing it
> into the top drivers/gpu/drm/msm dir? This way we'd point that it is a
> generic piece of code shared between all drm/msm drivers.

I dont have a strong preference of drm/msm Vs drm/msm/disp. I just put 
them here
based on Rob's comment on the prev patchset 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/427690/?series=82942&rev=3

> 
>>   	msm_atomic.o \
>>   	msm_atomic_tracepoints.o \
>>   	msm_debugfs.o \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> index 4dfd8a2..0f9f0a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020 The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>>    */
>>     #ifndef _DPU_HW_CATALOG_H
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> index 88e9cc3..7529566 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> @@ -798,6 +798,67 @@ static void dpu_irq_uninstall(struct msm_kms 
>> *kms)
>>   	dpu_core_irq_uninstall(dpu_kms);
>>   }
>>   +void dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(struct drm_device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct dpu_mdss_cfg *cat;
>> +	struct dpu_hw_mdp *top;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +
>> +	priv = dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +	disp_state = dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +
>> +	cat = dpu_kms->catalog;
>> +	top = dpu_kms->hw_mdp;
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
>> +
>> +	/* dump CTL sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->ctl_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "ctl_%d", i);
> 
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "ctl_%d", i);
> (the same bellow)
Rob just mentioned to me on IRC to move this snprintf inside 
msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(). I am planning to do that in the next 
patchset.
With that will fix this too.
> 
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->ctl[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->ctl[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump DSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->dspp_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "dspp_%d", i);
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->dspp[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->dspp[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump INTF sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->intf_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "intf_%d", i);
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->intf[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->intf[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump PP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->pingpong_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "ping-pong_%d", i);
> 
> Just a nitpick: we usually call it pp or pingpong, without dash.

Sure I will fix this.

> 
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->pingpong[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->pingpong[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dump SSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++) {
>> +		snprintf(name, SZ_128, "sspp_%d", i);
>> +		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, cat->sspp[i].len,
>> +				dpu_kms->mmio + cat->sspp[i].base);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	snprintf(name, SZ_128, "top");
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, top->hw.length,
>> +			dpu_kms->mmio + top->hw.blk_off);
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct msm_kms_funcs kms_funcs = {
>>   	.hw_init         = dpu_kms_hw_init,
>>   	.irq_preinstall  = dpu_irq_preinstall,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>> index d6717d6..74b6ce6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>>     #include "msm_drv.h"
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>   #include "msm_kms.h"
>>   #include "msm_mmu.h"
>>   #include "msm_gem.h"
>> @@ -132,6 +133,8 @@ struct dpu_kms {
>>     	struct opp_table *opp_table;
>>   +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>>   	struct dss_module_power mp;
>>     	/* reference count bandwidth requests, so we know when we can
>> @@ -265,4 +268,6 @@ void dpu_kms_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder 
>> *encoder);
>>    */
>>   u64 dpu_kms_get_clk_rate(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms, char *clock_name);
>>   +void dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(struct drm_device *dev);
>> +
>>   #endif /* __dpu_kms_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..1bdad16
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"[drm:%s:%d] " fmt, __func__, __LINE__
>> +
>> +#include "msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
>> +static ssize_t disp_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>> +		size_t count, void *data, size_t datalen)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_print_iterator iter;
>> +	struct drm_printer p;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	disp_state = data;
>> +
>> +	iter.data = buffer;
>> +	iter.offset = 0;
>> +	iter.start = offset;
>> +	iter.remain = count;
>> +
>> +	p = drm_coredump_printer(&iter);
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_state_print(disp_state, &p, MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_COREDUMP);
>> +
>> +	return count - iter.remain;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void disp_devcoredump_free(void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	disp_state = data;
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_state_free(disp_state);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->coredump_pending = false;
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP */
>> +
>> +static void _msm_disp_snapshot_work(struct kthread_work *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state = container_of(work, struct 
>> msm_disp_state, dump_work);
>> +	struct drm_printer p;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state(disp_state);
>> +
>> +	if (MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_DUMP_IN_CONSOLE) {
>> +		p = drm_info_printer(disp_state->drm_dev->dev);
>> +		msm_disp_state_print(disp_state, &p, MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_LOG);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * if devcoredump is not defined free the state immediately
>> +	 * otherwise it will be freed in the free handler.
>> +	 */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
>> +	dev_coredumpm(disp_state->dev, THIS_MODULE, disp_state, 0, 
>> GFP_KERNEL,
>> +			disp_devcoredump_read, disp_devcoredump_free);
>> +	disp_state->coredump_pending = true;
>> +#else
>> +	msm_disp_state_free(disp_state);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_state(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!drm_dev) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
> 
> If we are outside of disp/dpu1, we shouldn't reference dpu_kms
> internals. Probably this can be changed to use msm_drm_private,
> msm_kms or msm_mdss?
This was originally within dpu1 but based on Rob's comment I moved it to 
disp.
Since this is a debug module I thought its okay to reference it here. 
Its not
modifying anything which will impact the current dpu state.
If there is a strong preference for this, sure I can move it to 
msm_drm_private.
> 
>> +	disp_state = dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!disp_state) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * if there is a coredump pending return immediately till dump
>> +	 * if read by userspace or timeout happens
> 
> Where do we handle the timeout? Stale comment or did I miss something?
The timeout happens in the devcoredump driver and it calls the free() 
from there.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/base/devcoredump.c#L304

> 
>> +	 */
>> +	if (disp_state->coredump_pending) {
>> +		DRM_DEBUG("coredump is pending read\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kthread_queue_work(disp_state->dump_worker,
>> +			&disp_state->dump_work);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int msm_disp_snapshot_init(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!drm_dev) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +
>> +	disp_state = devm_kzalloc(drm_dev->dev, sizeof(struct 
>> msm_disp_state), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +	mutex_init(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->dev = drm_dev->dev;
>> +	disp_state->drm_dev = drm_dev;
>> +
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&disp_state->blocks);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->dump_worker = kthread_create_worker(0, "%s", 
>> "disp_snapshot");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(disp_state->dump_worker))
>> +		DRM_ERROR("failed to create disp state task\n");
>> +
>> +	kthread_init_work(&disp_state->dump_work, _msm_disp_snapshot_work);
>> +
>> +	dpu_kms->disp_state = disp_state;
> 
> Judging from this code, I think it should be possible to push
> disp_state directly into struct msm_drm_private.
Again no strong preference here. I just kept it in dpu_kms based on a 
discussion with Rob.
We can move it to msm_drm_private too if there is a strong preference to 
do so.
> 
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_destroy(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (!drm_dev) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid params\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +	disp_state = dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +
>> +	if (disp_state->dump_worker)
>> +		kthread_destroy_worker(disp_state->dump_worker);
>> +
>> +	list_del(&disp_state->blocks);
>> +
>> +	mutex_destroy(&disp_state->mutex);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..0ccb7e7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_H_
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_H_
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
>> +#include "../../../drm_crtc_internal.h"
>> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/list_sort.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>> +#include <linux/devcoredump.h>
>> +#include <stdarg.h>
>> +#include "dpu_hw_catalog.h"
>> +#include "dpu_kms.h"
>> +#include "dsi.h"
>> +
>> +enum msm_disp_snapshot_dump_flag {
>> +	MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_LOG = BIT(0),
>> +	MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM = BIT(1),
>> +	MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_COREDUMP = BIT(2),
> 
> Are they mutually exclusive or can they be specified in parallel?
They are mutually exclusive
> 
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_MAX_BLKS		10
>> +
>> +/* debug option to print the registers in logs */
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_DUMP_IN_CONSOLE 0
>> +
>> +/* print debug ranges in groups of 4 u32s */
>> +#define REG_DUMP_ALIGN		16
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct msm_disp_state - structure to store current dpu state
>> + * @dev: device pointer
>> + * @drm_dev: drm device pointer
>> + * @mutex: mutex to serialize access to serialze dumps, debugfs 
>> access
>> + * @coredump_pending: coredump is pending read from userspace
>> + * @atomic_state: atomic state duplicated at the time of the error
>> + * @dump_worker: kworker thread which runs the dump work
>> + * @dump_work: kwork which dumps the registers and drm state
>> + * @timestamp: timestamp at which the coredump was captured
>> + */
>> +struct msm_disp_state {
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +	struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> +	struct mutex mutex;
>> +
>> +	bool coredump_pending;
>> +
>> +	struct list_head blocks;
>> +
>> +	struct drm_atomic_state *atomic_state;
>> +
>> +	struct kthread_worker *dump_worker;
>> +	struct kthread_work dump_work;
>> +	ktime_t timestamp;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct msm_disp_state_block - structure to store each hardware 
>> block state
>> + * @name: name of the block
>> + * @drm_dev: handle to the linked list head
>> + * @size: size of the register space of this hardware block
>> + * @state: array holding the register dump of this hardware block
>> + * @base_addr: starting address of this hardware block's register 
>> space
>> + */
>> +struct msm_disp_state_block {
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +	struct list_head node;
>> +	unsigned int size;
>> +	u32 *state;
>> +	void __iomem *base_addr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT - trigger to dump the display snapshot
>> + * @drm_dev:	handle to drm device
>> + */
>> +#define MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT(drm_dev) msm_disp_snapshot_state(drm_dev)
> 
> Why do you need it?
Not really needed now, I can just call into msm_disp_snapshot_state() 
instead
> 
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_init - initialize global sde debug facilities: 
>> evtlog, regdump
> 
> Just a nitpick here and below: there is no sde in the upstream. And no 
> evtlog.
Sorry this is a stale comment, I thought I got rid of this, will fix 
this.
> 
>> + * @drm_dev:	drm device handle
>> + *
>> + * Returns:		0 or -ERROR
>> + */
>> +int msm_disp_snapshot_init(struct drm_device *drm_dev);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_destroy - destroy the global sde debug 
>> facilities
>> + * @drm_dev:    drm device handle
>> + *
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_destroy(struct drm_device *drm_dev);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_state - trigger to dump the display snapshot
>> + * @drm_dev:	handle to drm device
>> +
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_state(struct drm_device *drm_dev);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_state_get - get the handle to msm_disp_state struct from 
>> the drm device
>> + * @drm:	    handle to drm device
>> +
>> + * Returns:	handle to the msm_disp_state struct
>> + */
>> +struct msm_disp_state *msm_disp_state_get(struct drm_device *drm);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_state_print - print out the current dpu state
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to drm device
>> + * @p:	    handle to drm printer
>> + * @reg_dump_method: tells whether the state has to be dumped in log 
>> or coredump
>> + *
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_state_print(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, struct 
>> drm_printer *p,
>> +		u8 reg_dump_method);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state - utility to capture atomic state 
>> and hw registers
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to msm_disp_state struct
>> +
>> + * Returns:	none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state(struct msm_disp_state 
>> *disp_state);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_state_free - free the memory after the coredump has been 
>> read
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to struct msm_disp_state
>> +
>> + * Returns: none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_state_free(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * msm_disp_snapshot_add_block - add a hardware block with its 
>> register dump
>> + * @disp_state:	    handle to struct msm_disp_state
>> + * @name:           name of the hardware block
>> + * @len:            size of the register space of the hardware block
>> + * @base_addr:      starting address of the register space of the 
>> hardware block
>> + *
>> + * Returns: none
>> + */
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, 
>> char *name, u32 len,
>> +		void __iomem *base_addr);
>> +
>> +#endif /* MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..383f225
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/msm_disp_snapshot_util.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"[drm:%s:%d] " fmt, __func__, __LINE__
>> +
>> +#include "msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>> +
>> +static void msm_disp_state_dump_regs(u32 **reg, u32 len, void __iomem 
>> *base_addr,
>> +		u32 dump_op, struct drm_printer *p)
>> +{
>> +	u32 len_aligned, len_padded;
>> +	u32 x0, x4, x8, xc;
>> +	void __iomem *addr;
>> +	u32 *dump_addr = NULL;
>> +	void __iomem *end_addr;
>> +	int i;
>> +	bool in_drm_printer = false;
>> +
>> +	len_aligned = (len + REG_DUMP_ALIGN - 1) / REG_DUMP_ALIGN;
>> +	len_padded = len_aligned * REG_DUMP_ALIGN;
>> +
>> +	addr = base_addr;
>> +	end_addr = base_addr + len;
>> +
>> +	if ((dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_COREDUMP) ||
>> +		(dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_LOG))
>> +		in_drm_printer = true;
>> +
>> +	if (in_drm_printer && !p) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid drm printer\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM && !(*reg))
>> +		*reg = kzalloc(len_padded, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +	if (*reg)
>> +		dump_addr = *reg;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < len_aligned; i++) {
>> +		if (dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM) {
>> +			x0 = (addr < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0x0) : 0;
>> +			x4 = (addr + 0x4 < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0x4) : 0;
>> +			x8 = (addr + 0x8 < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0x8) : 0;
>> +			xc = (addr + 0xc < end_addr) ? readl_relaxed(addr + 0xc) : 0;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (dump_addr) {
>> +			if (dump_op == MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM) {
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4] = x0;
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4 + 1] = x4;
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4 + 2] = x8;
>> +				dump_addr[i * 4 + 3] = xc;
>> +			} else if (in_drm_printer) {
>> +				drm_printf(p, "0x%lx : %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
>> +						(unsigned long)(addr - base_addr),
>> +						dump_addr[i * 4], dump_addr[i * 4 + 1],
>> +						dump_addr[i * 4 + 2], dump_addr[i * 4 + 3]);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		addr += REG_DUMP_ALIGN;
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> I'd just split this function into two different cases, IN_MEM and 
> DRM_PRINTER.
I wanted to utilize the common loop here, if it will make it more clear 
I can just have two functions.
But it will duplicate a lot of code.
> 
>> +
>> +struct msm_disp_state *msm_disp_state_get(struct drm_device *drm)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> +
>> +	priv = drm->dev_private;
>> +	dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>> +
>> +	return dpu_kms->disp_state;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_state_print(struct msm_disp_state *state, struct 
>> drm_printer *p,
>> +		u8 reg_dump_method)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state_block *block, *tmp;
>> +
>> +	if (!p) {
>> +		DRM_ERROR("invalid drm printer\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	drm_printf(p, "---\n");
>> +
>> +	drm_printf(p, "module: " KBUILD_MODNAME "\n");
>> +	drm_printf(p, "dpu devcoredump\n");
>> +	drm_printf(p, "timestamp %lld\n", ktime_to_ns(state->timestamp));
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(block, tmp, &state->blocks, node) {
>> +		drm_printf(p, "====================%s================\n", 
>> block->name);
>> +		msm_disp_state_dump_regs(&block->state, block->size, 
>> block->base_addr,
>> +				reg_dump_method, p);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	drm_printf(p, "===================dpu drm state================\n");
>> +
>> +	if (state->atomic_state)
>> +		drm_atomic_print_new_state(state->atomic_state, p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void msm_disp_capture_atomic_state(struct msm_disp_state 
>> *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_device *ddev;
>> +	struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
>> +
>> +	disp_state->timestamp = ktime_get();
>> +
>> +	ddev = disp_state->drm_dev;
>> +
>> +	drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx, 0);
>> +
>> +	while (drm_modeset_lock_all_ctx(ddev, &ctx) != 0)
>> +		drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
>> +
>> +	disp_state->atomic_state = drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(ddev,
>> +			&ctx);
>> +	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
>> +	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_capture_state(struct msm_disp_state 
>> *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_drm_private *priv;
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> +
>> +	drm_dev = disp_state->drm_dev;
>> +	priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_capture_atomic_state(disp_state);
>> +
>> +	if (priv->dp)
>> +		msm_dp_snapshot(priv->dp);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dsi); i++) {
>> +		if (!priv->dsi[i])
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		msm_dsi_snapshot(priv->dsi[i]);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(drm_dev);
> 
> Hmm, I now see why do you need the dpu_kms. Can we have a check for
> the mdp version here? The rest of the code seems generic enough, so we
> can at least dump the dsi/dp (and hopefully eDP/HDMI) data for MDP4/5.
> 
> Ideally subdrivers should be able to report back to the core, which
> regions are available, so that we won't have this static code. But
> this might look like an overkill. Not to mention that it might lead to
> the not-so-static sequence of dumps. (As you can judge, I quite liked
> the previous approach, when the drivers registered the dumping regions
> and then the dumper would go through them.)
> 
> Let's have the static config in place with the version check.
Yes, I can have a DPU check here.
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_state_free(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state_block *block, *tmp;
>> +
>> +	if (disp_state->atomic_state) {
>> +		drm_atomic_state_put(disp_state->atomic_state);
>> +		disp_state->atomic_state = NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(block, tmp, &disp_state->blocks, node) {
>> +		kfree(block->state);
>> +		list_del(&block->node);
> 
> I'd swap these two lines, so while the block is in the list, its state
> is coherent.
Ok, will fix this.
> 
>> +		kfree(block);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, 
>> char *name, u32 len,
>> +		void __iomem *base_addr)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_disp_state_block *new_blk;
>> +
>> +	new_blk = kzalloc(sizeof(struct msm_disp_state_block), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +	strscpy(new_blk->name, name, sizeof(new_blk->name));
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_blk->node);
>> +	new_blk->size = len;
>> +	new_blk->base_addr = base_addr;
>> +	msm_disp_state_dump_regs(&new_blk->state, len, base_addr,
>> +			MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_MEM, NULL);
>> +	list_add(&new_blk->node, &disp_state->blocks);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>> index b1a9b1b..ce8d19a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>> @@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ struct dp_catalog_private {
>>   	u8 aux_lut_cfg_index[PHY_AUX_CFG_MAX];
>>   };
>>   +void dp_catalog_snapshot(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog, struct 
>> msm_disp_state *disp_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct dp_catalog_private *catalog = container_of(dp_catalog,
>> +			struct dp_catalog_private, dp_catalog);
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +
>> +	snprintf(name, SZ_128, "dp_ctrl");
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, 
>> catalog->io->dp_controller.len,
>> +			catalog->io->dp_controller.base);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline u32 dp_read_aux(struct dp_catalog_private *catalog, 
>> u32 offset)
>>   {
>>   	offset += MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_AUX_OFFSET;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h
>> index 176a902..e7e8b13 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_modes.h>
>>     #include "dp_parser.h"
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>     /* interrupts */
>>   #define DP_INTR_HPD		BIT(0)
>> @@ -71,6 +72,9 @@ struct dp_catalog {
>>   	u32 audio_data;
>>   };
>>   +/* Debug module */
>> +void dp_catalog_snapshot(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog, struct 
>> msm_disp_state *disp_state);
>> +
>>   /* AUX APIs */
>>   u32 dp_catalog_aux_read_data(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog);
>>   int dp_catalog_aux_write_data(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index 5a39da6..6670558 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -1009,6 +1009,35 @@ int dp_display_get_test_bpp(struct msm_dp *dp)
>>   		dp_display->link->test_video.test_bit_depth);
>>   }
>>   +void msm_dp_snapshot(struct msm_dp *dp)
>> +{
>> +	struct dp_display_private *dp_display;
>> +	struct drm_device *drm;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +
>> +	dp_display = container_of(dp, struct dp_display_private, 
>> dp_display);
>> +	drm = dp->drm_dev;
>> +	disp_state = msm_disp_state_get(drm);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * if we are reading registers we need the link clocks to be on
>> +	 * however till DP cable is connected this will not happen as we
>> +	 * do not know the resolution to power up with. Hence check the
>> +	 * power_on status before dumping DP registers to avoid crash due
>> +	 * to unclocked access
>> +	 */
>> +	mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>> +
>> +	if (!dp->power_on) {
>> +		mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dp_catalog_snapshot(dp_display->catalog, disp_state);
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void dp_display_config_hpd(struct dp_display_private *dp)
>>   {
>>   diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
>> index 6092ba1..4d39373 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>>     #include "dp_panel.h"
>>   #include <sound/hdmi-codec.h>
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>     struct msm_dp {
>>   	struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> index 62704885..bccc006 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> @@ -266,3 +266,8 @@ int msm_dsi_modeset_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi, 
>> struct drm_device *dev,
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   +void msm_dsi_snapshot(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
>> +{
>> +	msm_dsi_host_snapshot(msm_dsi->host);
>> +}
>> +
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> index 7abfeab..bb39403 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
>>     #include "msm_drv.h"
>> +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>     #define DSI_0	0
>>   #define DSI_1	1
>> @@ -90,6 +91,8 @@ static inline bool msm_dsi_device_connected(struct 
>> msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
>>   	return msm_dsi->panel || msm_dsi->external_bridge;
>>   }
>>   +void msm_dsi_snapshot(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi);
>> +
>>   struct drm_encoder *msm_dsi_get_encoder(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi);
>>     /* dsi host */
>> @@ -146,6 +149,7 @@ int dsi_clk_init_v2(struct msm_dsi_host 
>> *msm_host);
>>   int dsi_clk_init_6g_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>>   int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool 
>> is_dual_dsi);
>>   int dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool 
>> is_dual_dsi);
>> +void msm_dsi_host_snapshot(struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
>>     /* dsi phy */
>>   struct msm_dsi_phy;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> index 8a10e43..d9fdc07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> @@ -2487,3 +2487,22 @@ struct drm_bridge 
>> *msm_dsi_host_get_bridge(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
>>     	return of_drm_find_bridge(msm_host->device_node);
>>   }
>> +
>> +void msm_dsi_host_snapshot(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
>> +{
>> +	struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host = to_msm_dsi_host(host);
>> +	struct drm_device *dev = msm_host->dev;
>> +	struct msm_disp_state *disp_state;
>> +	char name[SZ_128];
>> +
>> +	disp_state = msm_disp_state_get(dev);
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&msm_host->pdev->dev);
>> +
>> +	snprintf(name, SZ_128, "dsi%d_ctrl", msm_host->id);
>> +
>> +	msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, name, 
>> msm_iomap_size(msm_host->pdev, "dsi_ctrl"),
> 
> You can store the size into the msm_host, rather than querrying it on 
> each dump.

We need to query the base address anyway so it wont lead to much saving.

> 
>> +			msm_host->ctrl_base);
>> +
>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(&msm_host->pdev->dev);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> index e1104d2..ebf9283 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>   /*
>> - * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>> rights reserved.
>>    * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat
>>    * Author: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
>>    */
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_of.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_vblank.h>
>>   +#include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
>>   #include "msm_drv.h"
>>   #include "msm_debugfs.h"
>>   #include "msm_fence.h"
>> @@ -167,6 +168,24 @@ void __iomem *msm_ioremap_quiet(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev, const char *name,
>>   	return _msm_ioremap(pdev, name, dbgname, true);
>>   }
>>   +unsigned long msm_iomap_size(struct platform_device *pdev, const 
>> char *name)
>> +{
>> +	struct resource *res;
>> +
>> +	if (name)
>> +		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, name);
>> +	else
>> +		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> +
>> +	if (!res) {
>> +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "failed to get memory resource: %s\n",
>> +				name);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return resource_size(res);
>> +}
>> +
>>   void msm_writel(u32 data, void __iomem *addr)
>>   {
>>   	if (reglog)
>> @@ -278,6 +297,8 @@ static int msm_drm_uninit(struct device *dev)
>>   		msm_fbdev_free(ddev);
>>   #endif
>>   +	msm_disp_snapshot_destroy(ddev);
>> +
>>   	drm_mode_config_cleanup(ddev);
>>     	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>> @@ -550,6 +571,12 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const 
>> struct drm_driver *drv)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto err_msm_uninit;
>>   +	if (get_mdp_ver(pdev) == KMS_DPU) {
>> +		ret = msm_disp_snapshot_init(ddev);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "msm_disp_snapshot_init failed ret = %d\n", 
>> ret);
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> Let's get it out of if (KMS_DPU), even if we do not dump mdp4/mdp5
> registers for now.
since its stored inside dpu_kms right now, we need to have this DPU 
check.
If we agree on moving this out of dpu_kms then this check can be 
relaxed. But another issue
is I dont have a non-DPU_KMS board to verify this to see if it will 
break.
So at the moment, I am restricting this to it.

> 
>>   	drm_mode_config_reset(ddev);
>>     #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>> index 2668941..9c40bac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>> @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ void msm_dp_display_mode_set(struct msm_dp *dp, 
>> struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>>   				struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>>   				struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode);
>>   void msm_dp_irq_postinstall(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
>> +void msm_dp_snapshot(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
>>     void msm_dp_debugfs_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct 
>> drm_minor *minor);
>>   @@ -450,6 +451,7 @@ void __iomem *msm_ioremap(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev, const char *name,
>>   		const char *dbgname);
>>   void __iomem *msm_ioremap_quiet(struct platform_device *pdev, const 
>> char *name,
>>   		const char *dbgname);
>> +unsigned long msm_iomap_size(struct platform_device *pdev, const char 
>> *name);
>>   void msm_writel(u32 data, void __iomem *addr);
>>   u32 msm_readl(const void __iomem *addr);
>>   void msm_rmw(void __iomem *addr, u32 mask, u32 or);
>> 

Thanks

Abhinav
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-14 23:11 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add devcoredump support for DPU Abhinav Kumar
2021-04-14 23:11 ` Abhinav Kumar
2021-04-14 23:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm: allow drm_atomic_print_state() to accept any drm_printer Abhinav Kumar
2021-04-14 23:11   ` Abhinav Kumar
2021-04-14 23:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/msm: add support to take dpu snapshot Abhinav Kumar
2021-04-14 23:11   ` Abhinav Kumar
2021-04-15  0:16   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-04-15  0:16     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-04-15  1:10     ` abhinavk [this message]
2021-04-15  1:10       ` abhinavk
2021-04-15  4:07     ` Rob Clark
2021-04-15  4:07       ` Rob Clark
2021-04-14 23:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/msm: add disp snapshot points across dpu driver Abhinav Kumar
2021-04-14 23:11   ` Abhinav Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9cc72aa631d0d902bb6c381137aa7f51@codeaurora.org \
    --to=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=aravindh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=khsieh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nganji@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.