[PATCH v3 06/12] selftests/nolibc: use INT_MAX instead of __INT_MAX__

From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
To: w@1wt.eu
Cc: falcon@tinylab.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	thomas@t-8ch.de
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/12] selftests/nolibc: use INT_MAX instead of __INT_MAX__
Date: Sat,  3 Jun 2023 16:08:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e48ea5aab5a988fcba923632e6681c111dd5525.1685777982.git.falcon@tinylab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1685777982.git.falcon@tinylab.org>

nolibc now has INT_MAX in stdint.h, so, don't mix INT_MAX and
__INT_MAX__, unify them to INT_MAX.

Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index 2a2954cb7bef..a8fcad801cf2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static const struct test test_names[] = {
 int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
 {
 	int min = 0;
-	int max = __INT_MAX__;
+	int max = INT_MAX;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int err;
 	int idx;
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
 				 * here, which defaults to the full range.
 				 */
 				do {
-					min = 0; max = __INT_MAX__;
+					min = 0; max = INT_MAX;
 					value = colon;
 					if (value && *value) {
 						colon = strchr(value, ':');
-- 
2.25.1

