RE: [PATCH v3 5/6] device-dax: use fallback nid when numa_node is invalid

From: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@gmail.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-sh <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org >,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 5/6] device-dax: use fallback nid when numa_node is invalid
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 05:13:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM6PR08MB4069D206048464CFCBBFDC9EF7640@AM6PR08MB4069.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gfVhHyo-c=9bXd=z3=9Xqy7ato30D8p2aNsKBUONosug@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 11:39 AM
> To: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>; Will Deacon
> <will@kernel.org>; Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>; Fenghua Yu
> <fenghua.yu@intel.com>; Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>; Rich
> Felker <dalias@libc.org>; Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>; Andy
> Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>;
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>;
> Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>; David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>; X86
> ML <x86@kernel.org>; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>; Vishal Verma
> <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>; Andrew
> Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>; Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>; Chuhong
> Yuan <hslester96@gmail.com>; Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>; Logan
> Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>; Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>;
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>; Linux ARM <linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org; Linux-sh <linux-
> sh@vger.kernel.org>; linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>; Linux MM
> <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>; Kaly
> Xin <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] device-dax: use fallback nid when numa_node is
> invalid
> 
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:07 PM Jia He <justin.he@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > numa_off is set unconditionally at the end of dummy_numa_init(),
> > even with a fake numa node. ACPI detects node id as NUMA_NO_NODE(-1) in
> > acpi_map_pxm_to_node() because it regards numa_off as turning off the
> numa
> > node. Hence dev_dax->target_node is NUMA_NO_NODE on arm64 with fake numa.
> >
> > Without this patch, pmem can't be probed as a RAM device on arm64 if
> SRAT table
> > isn't present:
> > $ndctl create-namespace -fe namespace0.0 --mode=devdax --map=dev -s 1g -
> a 64K
> > kmem dax0.0: rejecting DAX region [mem 0x240400000-0x2bfffffff] with
> invalid node: -1
> > kmem: probe of dax0.0 failed with error -22
> >
> > This fixes it by using fallback memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() as nid.
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dax/kmem.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> > index 275aa5f87399..218f66057994 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> > @@ -31,22 +31,23 @@ int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
> >         int numa_node;
> >         int rc;
> >
> > +       /* Hotplug starting at the beginning of the next block: */
> > +       kmem_start = ALIGN(res->start, memory_block_size_bytes());
> > +
> >         /*
> >          * Ensure good NUMA information for the persistent memory.
> >          * Without this check, there is a risk that slow memory
> >          * could be mixed in a node with faster memory, causing
> > -        * unavoidable performance issues.
> > +        * unavoidable performance issues. Furthermore, fallback node
> > +        * id can be used when numa_node is invalid.
> >          */
> >         numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
> >         if (numa_node < 0) {
> > -               dev_warn(dev, "rejecting DAX region %pR with invalid
> node: %d\n",
> > -                        res, numa_node);
> > -               return -EINVAL;
> > +               numa_node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(kmem_start);
> 
> I think this fixup belongs to the core to set a fallback value for
> dev_dax->target_node.
> 
> I'm close to having patches to provide a functional
> phys_addr_to_target_node() for arm64.

Should My this patch(5/6) wait on your new phys_addr_to_target_node() patch?
Thanks for the clarification.

--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org