Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] PCI: brcmstb: Split brcm_pcie_setup() into two funcs

From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jim Quinlan" <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
	"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Cyril Brulebois" <kibi@debian.org>,
	"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] PCI: brcmstb: Split brcm_pcie_setup() into two funcs
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:29:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+-6iNzQZVi8MbyeZNcBzE0hGjGiYSUk3riSXxTALtFyC00aPQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706215603.GA221278@bhelgaas>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6569 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 5:56 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 12:27:22PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > We need to take some code in brcm_pcie_setup() and put it in a new function
> > brcm_pcie_linkup().  In future commits the brcm_pcie_linkup() function will
> > be called indirectly by pci_host_probe() as opposed to the host driver
> > invoking it directly.
> >
> > Some code that was executed after the PCIe linkup is now placed so that it
> > executes prior to linkup, since this code has to run prior to the
> > invocation of pci_host_probe().
>
> This says we need to move some code from brcm_pcie_setup() to
> brcm_pcie_linkup(), but not *why* we need to do that.
I will elaborate in the commit message.
>
> In brcm_pcie_resume(), they're called together:
>
>   brcm_pcie_resume
>     brcm_pcie_setup
>     brcm_pcie_linkup
>
> In the probe path, they're not called together, but they're in the
> same order:
>
>   brcm_pcie_probe
>     brcm_pcie_setup
>     pci_host_probe
>       ...
>         brcm_pcie_add_bus               # bus->ops->add_bus
>           brcm_pcie_linkup
>
> Is there something that must happen *between* them in the probe path?

Yes.  In the probe() case, we must do things in this order:

1. brcm_pcie_setup()
2. Turn on regulators
3. brcm_pcie_linkup()

Since the voltage regulators are turned on during enumeration, pci_host_probe()
must be invoked prior to 3.  Before regulators, we did not care.

In the resume case, there is no enumeration of course but our driver
has a handle to
the regulators and can turn them on/off w/o help.

Regards,
Jim  Quinlan
Broradcom STB

>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106160332.2143-5-jim2101024@gmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > index e61058e13818..2bf5cc399fd0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > @@ -926,16 +926,9 @@ static inline int brcm_pcie_get_rc_bar2_size_and_offset(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
> >
> >  static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> >  {
> > -     struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> >       u64 rc_bar2_offset, rc_bar2_size;
> >       void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
> > -     struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > -     struct resource_entry *entry;
> > -     bool ssc_good = false;
> > -     struct resource *res;
> > -     int num_out_wins = 0;
> > -     u16 nlw, cls, lnksta;
> > -     int i, ret, memc;
> > +     int ret, memc;
> >       u32 tmp, burst, aspm_support;
> >
> >       /* Reset the bridge */
> > @@ -1025,6 +1018,40 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> >       if (pcie->gen)
> >               brcm_pcie_set_gen(pcie, pcie->gen);
> >
> > +     /* Don't advertise L0s capability if 'aspm-no-l0s' */
> > +     aspm_support = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
> > +     if (!of_property_read_bool(pcie->np, "aspm-no-l0s"))
> > +             aspm_support |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
> > +     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > +     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, aspm_support,
> > +             PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY_ASPM_SUPPORT_MASK);
> > +     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * For config space accesses on the RC, show the right class for
> > +      * a PCIe-PCIe bridge (the default setting is to be EP mode).
> > +      */
> > +     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > +     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, 0x060400,
> > +                       PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3_CLASS_CODE_MASK);
> > +     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int brcm_pcie_linkup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > +     struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> > +     struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > +     void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
> > +     struct resource_entry *entry;
> > +     struct resource *res;
> > +     int num_out_wins = 0;
> > +     u16 nlw, cls, lnksta;
> > +     bool ssc_good = false;
> > +     u32 tmp;
> > +     int ret, i;
> > +
> >       /* Unassert the fundamental reset */
> >       pcie->perst_set(pcie, 0);
> >
> > @@ -1075,24 +1102,6 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> >               num_out_wins++;
> >       }
> >
> > -     /* Don't advertise L0s capability if 'aspm-no-l0s' */
> > -     aspm_support = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
> > -     if (!of_property_read_bool(pcie->np, "aspm-no-l0s"))
> > -             aspm_support |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
> > -     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > -     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, aspm_support,
> > -             PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY_ASPM_SUPPORT_MASK);
> > -     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > -
> > -     /*
> > -      * For config space accesses on the RC, show the right class for
> > -      * a PCIe-PCIe bridge (the default setting is to be EP mode).
> > -      */
> > -     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > -     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, 0x060400,
> > -                       PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3_CLASS_CODE_MASK);
> > -     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > -
> >       if (pcie->ssc) {
> >               ret = brcm_pcie_set_ssc(pcie);
> >               if (ret == 0)
> > @@ -1281,6 +1290,10 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
> >       if (ret)
> >               goto err_reset;
> >
> > +     ret = brcm_pcie_linkup(pcie);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto err_reset;
> > +
> >       if (pcie->msi)
> >               brcm_msi_set_regs(pcie->msi);
> >
> > @@ -1398,6 +1411,10 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       if (ret)
> >               goto fail;
> >
> > +     ret = brcm_pcie_linkup(pcie);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto fail;
> > +
> >       pcie->hw_rev = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_MISC_REVISION);
> >       if (pcie->type == BCM4908 && pcie->hw_rev >= BRCM_PCIE_HW_REV_3_20) {
> >               dev_err(pcie->dev, "hardware revision with unsupported PERST# setup\n");
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4210 bytes --]