All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:18:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYutuU55iL_6Qrk3oG3iq-37PaxvtA4KnEQHuLH9YpH-QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626062948.GA25285@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 12:00, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > The source code for the two failing AF_ALG tests is here:
> >
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg02.c
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg05.c
> >
> > They use read() and write(), not send() and recv().
> >
> > af_alg02 uses read() to read from a "salsa20" request socket without writing
> > anything to it.  It is expected that this returns 0, i.e. that behaves like
> > encrypting an empty message.

Since we are on this subject,
LTP af_alg02  test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
the beginning.

Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?

Test output:
af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.

ref:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log

- Naresh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:48:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYutuU55iL_6Qrk3oG3iq-37PaxvtA4KnEQHuLH9YpH-QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626062948.GA25285@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 12:00, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > The source code for the two failing AF_ALG tests is here:
> >
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg02.c
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg05.c
> >
> > They use read() and write(), not send() and recv().
> >
> > af_alg02 uses read() to read from a "salsa20" request socket without writing
> > anything to it.  It is expected that this returns 0, i.e. that behaves like
> > encrypting an empty message.

Since we are on this subject,
LTP af_alg02  test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
the beginning.

Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?

Test output:
af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.

ref:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log

- Naresh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>, linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:18:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYutuU55iL_6Qrk3oG3iq-37PaxvtA4KnEQHuLH9YpH-QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626062948.GA25285@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 12:00, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > The source code for the two failing AF_ALG tests is here:
> >
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg02.c
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg05.c
> >
> > They use read() and write(), not send() and recv().
> >
> > af_alg02 uses read() to read from a "salsa20" request socket without writing
> > anything to it.  It is expected that this returns 0, i.e. that behaves like
> > encrypting an empty message.

Since we are on this subject,
LTP af_alg02  test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
the beginning.

Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?

Test output:
af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.

ref:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log

- Naresh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:18:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYutuU55iL_6Qrk3oG3iq-37PaxvtA4KnEQHuLH9YpH-QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626062948.GA25285@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 12:00, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > The source code for the two failing AF_ALG tests is here:
> >
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg02.c
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/crypto/af_alg05.c
> >
> > They use read() and write(), not send() and recv().
> >
> > af_alg02 uses read() to read from a "salsa20" request socket without writing
> > anything to it.  It is expected that this returns 0, i.e. that behaves like
> > encrypting an empty message.

Since we are on this subject,
LTP af_alg02  test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
the beginning.

Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?

Test output:
af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.

ref:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log

- Naresh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-22 18:34 LTP: crypto: af_alg02 regression on linux-next 20200621 tag Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-22 18:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-22 18:34 ` [LTP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-22 22:49 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-22 22:49   ` [LTP] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-23  6:23   ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-23  6:35     ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-23  6:23     ` [LTP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-23  6:40     ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-23  6:40       ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-23  6:40       ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-23 17:02       ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-23 17:02         ` [LTP] " Eric Biggers
2020-06-23 17:02         ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-24  0:23         ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-24  0:23           ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-24  0:23           ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-26  6:29         ` [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests Herbert Xu
2020-06-26  6:29           ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-26  6:29           ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-26  6:29           ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-27  8:31           ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-27  8:31             ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-27  8:31             ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-29  8:53             ` [LKP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-29  8:53               ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-29  8:53               ` [LTP] [LKP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-30  8:48           ` Naresh Kamboju [this message]
2020-06-30  8:48             ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-30  8:48             ` [LTP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-30  8:48             ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-07-02  3:32             ` [v2 PATCH] " Herbert Xu
2020-07-02  3:32               ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-07-02  3:32               ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-02  3:32               ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-03 13:35               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:35                 ` [LTP] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:35                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:35                 ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+G9fYutuU55iL_6Qrk3oG3iq-37PaxvtA4KnEQHuLH9YpH-QA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.