All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, Jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
	Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
	enric.balletbo@collabora.co.uk,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.co.uk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/rockchip: vop: fix irq disabled after vop driver probed
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:44:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5D77W8qQm9YmOtr_bpD7WpA9VokjQ+jvTo05F4BFdyrTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180612121537.31223-3-heiko@sntech.de>

Hi Heiko,

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:15 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>
> From: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>
>
> The vop irq is shared between vop and iommu and irq probing in the
> iommu driver moved to the probe function recently. This can in some
> cases lead to a stall if the irq is triggered while the vop driver
> still has it disabled, but the vop irq handler gets called.
>
> But there is no real need to disable the irq, as the vop can simply
> also track its enabled state and ignore irqs in that case.
> For this we can simply check the power-domain state of the vop,
> similar to how the iommu driver does it.
>
> So remove the enable/disable handling and add appropriate condition
> to the irq handler.
>
> changes in v2:
> - move to just check the power-domain state
> - add clock handling
> changes in v3:
> - clarify comment to speak of runtime-pm not power-domain
[snip]
> @@ -1209,8 +1215,11 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>         spin_unlock(&vop->irq_lock);
>
>         /* This is expected for vop iommu irqs, since the irq is shared */
> -       if (!active_irqs)
> -               return IRQ_NONE;
> +       if (!active_irqs) {
> +               ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +               vop_core_clks_disable(vop);

nit: If we're adding "out:", couldn't we also add "out_clks:" and move
the call to vop_core_clks_disable() there?

> +               goto out;
> +       }
>
>         if (active_irqs & DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR) {
>                 complete(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
> @@ -1236,6 +1245,10 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>                 DRM_DEV_ERROR(vop->dev, "Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n",
>                               active_irqs);
>
> +       vop_core_clks_disable(vop);
> +
> +out:
> +       pm_runtime_put(vop->dev);
>         return ret;
>  }

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.co.uk>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	enric.balletbo@collabora.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/rockchip: vop: fix irq disabled after vop driver probed
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:44:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5D77W8qQm9YmOtr_bpD7WpA9VokjQ+jvTo05F4BFdyrTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180612121537.31223-3-heiko@sntech.de>

Hi Heiko,

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:15 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>
> From: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>
>
> The vop irq is shared between vop and iommu and irq probing in the
> iommu driver moved to the probe function recently. This can in some
> cases lead to a stall if the irq is triggered while the vop driver
> still has it disabled, but the vop irq handler gets called.
>
> But there is no real need to disable the irq, as the vop can simply
> also track its enabled state and ignore irqs in that case.
> For this we can simply check the power-domain state of the vop,
> similar to how the iommu driver does it.
>
> So remove the enable/disable handling and add appropriate condition
> to the irq handler.
>
> changes in v2:
> - move to just check the power-domain state
> - add clock handling
> changes in v3:
> - clarify comment to speak of runtime-pm not power-domain
[snip]
> @@ -1209,8 +1215,11 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>         spin_unlock(&vop->irq_lock);
>
>         /* This is expected for vop iommu irqs, since the irq is shared */
> -       if (!active_irqs)
> -               return IRQ_NONE;
> +       if (!active_irqs) {
> +               ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +               vop_core_clks_disable(vop);

nit: If we're adding "out:", couldn't we also add "out_clks:" and move
the call to vop_core_clks_disable() there?

> +               goto out;
> +       }
>
>         if (active_irqs & DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR) {
>                 complete(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
> @@ -1236,6 +1245,10 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>                 DRM_DEV_ERROR(vop->dev, "Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n",
>                               active_irqs);
>
> +       vop_core_clks_disable(vop);
> +
> +out:
> +       pm_runtime_put(vop->dev);
>         return ret;
>  }

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>

Best regards,
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-18  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-12 12:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/rockchip: try to fix vblank hang resulting from iommu irq change Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-12 12:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/rockchip: vop: split out core clock enablement into separate functions Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-12 12:15   ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-12 12:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/rockchip: vop: fix irq disabled after vop driver probed Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-12 12:15   ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-12 12:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-12 13:12     ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-12 13:12       ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-12 12:50   ` JeffyChen
2018-06-12 12:50     ` JeffyChen
2018-06-18  8:44   ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2018-06-18  8:44     ` Tomasz Figa
2018-06-18  9:38     ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-18  9:38       ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAFQd5D77W8qQm9YmOtr_bpD7WpA9VokjQ+jvTo05F4BFdyrTw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.