Re: [PATCH v3] kasan: fix KASAN unit tests for tag-based KASAN

From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
To: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kasan: fix KASAN unit tests for tag-based KASAN
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:37:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+zQDeo5K8D9QTQvdkp4H36s_wPPcGDizJ-ZDD0YAtLeRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200706115039.16750-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:50 PM Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> We use tag-based KASAN, then KASAN unit tests don't detect out-of-bounds
> memory access. They need to be fixed.
>
> With tag-based KASAN, the state of each 16 aligned bytes of memory is
> encoded in one shadow byte and the shadow value is tag of pointer, so
> we need to read next shadow byte, the shadow value is not equal to tag
> value of pointer, so that tag-based KASAN will detect out-of-bounds
> memory access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> Suggested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> changes since v1:
> - Reduce amount of non-compiled code.
> - KUnit-KASAN Integration patchset is not merged yet. My patch should
>   have conflict with it, if needed, we can continue to wait it.
>
> changes since v2:
> - Add one marco to make unit tests more readability.
>
> ---
>  lib/test_kasan.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
> index e3087d90e00d..b5049a807e25 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>
> +#define OOB_TAG_OFF (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) ? 0 : 13)

Let's use KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE instead of 13 to make sure the
access always lands in the next memory granule.

With that:

Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>

> +
>  /*
>   * Note: test functions are marked noinline so that their names appear in
>   * reports.
> @@ -40,7 +42,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_right(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       ptr[size] = 'x';
> +       ptr[size + OOB_TAG_OFF] = 'x';
> +
>         kfree(ptr);
>  }
>
> @@ -92,7 +95,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_pagealloc_oob_right(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       ptr[size] = 0;
> +       ptr[size + OOB_TAG_OFF] = 0;
> +
>         kfree(ptr);
>  }
>
> @@ -162,7 +166,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_krealloc_more(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       ptr2[size2] = 'x';
> +       ptr2[size2 + OOB_TAG_OFF] = 'x';
> +
>         kfree(ptr2);
>  }
>
> @@ -180,7 +185,9 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_krealloc_less(void)
>                 kfree(ptr1);
>                 return;
>         }
> -       ptr2[size2] = 'x';
> +
> +       ptr2[size2 + OOB_TAG_OFF] = 'x';
> +
>         kfree(ptr2);
>  }
>
> @@ -216,7 +223,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_memset_2(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       memset(ptr+7, 0, 2);
> +       memset(ptr + 7 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 2);
> +
>         kfree(ptr);
>  }
>
> @@ -232,7 +240,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_memset_4(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       memset(ptr+5, 0, 4);
> +       memset(ptr + 5 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 4);
> +
>         kfree(ptr);
>  }
>
> @@ -249,7 +258,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_memset_8(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       memset(ptr+1, 0, 8);
> +       memset(ptr + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 8);
> +
>         kfree(ptr);
>  }
>
> @@ -265,7 +275,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_memset_16(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       memset(ptr+1, 0, 16);
> +       memset(ptr + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 16);
> +
>         kfree(ptr);
>  }
>
> @@ -281,7 +292,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_in_memset(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       memset(ptr, 0, size+5);
> +       memset(ptr, 0, size + 5 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
> +
>         kfree(ptr);
>  }
>
> @@ -415,7 +427,8 @@ static noinline void __init kmem_cache_oob(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       *p = p[size];
> +       *p = p[size + OOB_TAG_OFF];
> +
>         kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
>         kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
>  }
> @@ -512,25 +525,25 @@ static noinline void __init copy_user_test(void)
>         }
>
>         pr_info("out-of-bounds in copy_from_user()\n");
> -       unused = copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1);
> +       unused = copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
>
>         pr_info("out-of-bounds in copy_to_user()\n");
> -       unused = copy_to_user(usermem, kmem, size + 1);
> +       unused = copy_to_user(usermem, kmem, size + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
>
>         pr_info("out-of-bounds in __copy_from_user()\n");
> -       unused = __copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1);
> +       unused = __copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
>
>         pr_info("out-of-bounds in __copy_to_user()\n");
> -       unused = __copy_to_user(usermem, kmem, size + 1);
> +       unused = __copy_to_user(usermem, kmem, size + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
>
>         pr_info("out-of-bounds in __copy_from_user_inatomic()\n");
> -       unused = __copy_from_user_inatomic(kmem, usermem, size + 1);
> +       unused = __copy_from_user_inatomic(kmem, usermem, size + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
>
>         pr_info("out-of-bounds in __copy_to_user_inatomic()\n");
> -       unused = __copy_to_user_inatomic(usermem, kmem, size + 1);
> +       unused = __copy_to_user_inatomic(usermem, kmem, size + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
>
>         pr_info("out-of-bounds in strncpy_from_user()\n");
> -       unused = strncpy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1);
> +       unused = strncpy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF);
>
>         vm_munmap((unsigned long)usermem, PAGE_SIZE);
>         kfree(kmem);
> --
> 2.18.0
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20200706115039.16750-1-walter-zh.wu%40mediatek.com.