From: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: KVM: Change the SBI specification version to v1.0 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:29:57 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAAhSdy1RVVq28h3FtbmToTOZJKPza4t-uFLVV2Uotj3DUrAEHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220908110404.186725-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 4:34 PM Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > The SBI v1.0 specificaiton is functionally same as SBI v0.3 > specification except that SBI v1.0 specification went through > the full RISC-V International ratification process. > > Let us change the SBI specification version to v1.0. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> I have queued this patch for 6.1 Thanks, Anup > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > index 26a446a34057..d4e3e600beef 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ > > #define KVM_SBI_IMPID 3 > > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 0 > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MINOR 3 > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 1 > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MINOR 0 > > struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension { > unsigned long extid_start; > -- > 2.34.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: KVM: Change the SBI specification version to v1.0 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:29:57 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAAhSdy1RVVq28h3FtbmToTOZJKPza4t-uFLVV2Uotj3DUrAEHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220908110404.186725-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 4:34 PM Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > The SBI v1.0 specificaiton is functionally same as SBI v0.3 > specification except that SBI v1.0 specification went through > the full RISC-V International ratification process. > > Let us change the SBI specification version to v1.0. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> I have queued this patch for 6.1 Thanks, Anup > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > index 26a446a34057..d4e3e600beef 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ > > #define KVM_SBI_IMPID 3 > > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 0 > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MINOR 3 > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 1 > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MINOR 0 > > struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension { > unsigned long extid_start; > -- > 2.34.1 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-16 5:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-09-08 11:04 [PATCH] RISC-V: KVM: Change the SBI specification version to v1.0 Anup Patel 2022-09-08 11:04 ` Anup Patel 2022-09-08 18:07 ` Atish Patra 2022-09-08 18:07 ` Atish Patra 2022-09-16 4:59 ` Anup Patel [this message] 2022-09-16 4:59 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAAhSdy1RVVq28h3FtbmToTOZJKPza4t-uFLVV2Uotj3DUrAEHw@mail.gmail.com \ --to=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \ --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \ --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \ --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.