All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	ML nouveau <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau: make backlight support non optional
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 14:51:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACO55tuceMUz2pgOM23wvcmtaTqbo6S6rCB+mfLptqJRt=fMWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACO55tsoi2akTKvFdz3p48UHRjFXDW7dUnOM8qVePBFWet-3UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 2:10 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 1:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 11:55 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 8:55 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 12:47 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In the past this only led to compilation issues. Also the small amount of
> > > > > extra .text shouldn't really matter compared to the entire nouveau driver
> > > > > anyway.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >         select DRM_TTM_HELPER
> > > > > -       select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE if DRM_NOUVEAU_BACKLIGHT
> > > > > -       select ACPI_VIDEO if ACPI && X86 && BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE && INPUT
> > > > > +       select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
> > > > > +       select ACPI_VIDEO if ACPI && X86 && INPUT
> > > > >         select X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES if ACPI && X86
> > > > >         select ACPI_WMI if ACPI && X86
> > > >
> > > > I think the logic needs to be the reverse: instead of 'select
> > > > BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE',
> > > > this should be 'depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE', and the same for ACPI_VIDEO.
> > > >
> > > > We may want to add 'default DRM || FB' to BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE in the
> > > > process so we don't lose it for users doing 'make oldconfig' or 'make defconfig'
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think the problem with
> > > "depends" is that the user needs to enable backlight support first
> > > before even seeing nouveau and I don't know if that makes sense. But
> > > maybe "default" is indeed helping here in this case.
> >
> > In general, no driver should ever 'select' a subsystem. Otherwise you end up
> > with two problems:
> >
> > - enabling this one driver suddenly makes all other drivers that have
> > a dependency
> >   on this visible, and some of those might have a 'default y', so you
> > end up with
> >   a ton of stuff in the kernel that would otherwise not be there.
> >
> > - It becomes impossible to turn it off as long as some driver has that 'select'.
> >   This is the pretty much the same problem as the one you describe, just
> >    the other side of it.
> >
> > - You run into dependency loops that prevent a successful build when some
> >    other driver has a 'depends on'. Preventing these loops was the main
> >    reason I said we should do this change.
> >
> > In theory we could change the other 85 drivers that use 'depends on' today,
> > and make BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE a hidden symbol that only ever
> > selected by the drivers that need it. This would avoid the third problem but
> > not the other one.
> >
> >       Arnd
> >
>
> I see. Yeah, I guess we can do it this way then. I just wasn't aware
> of the bigger picture here. Thanks for explaining.

yeah... that doesn't work. So the issue is, that X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES
is a little bit in the way. If I remove the select
X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES then I guess problems once ACPI is enabled, but
if I keep it, I get cyclic dep errors :/


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: ML nouveau <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] nouveau: make backlight support non optional
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 14:51:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACO55tuceMUz2pgOM23wvcmtaTqbo6S6rCB+mfLptqJRt=fMWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACO55tsoi2akTKvFdz3p48UHRjFXDW7dUnOM8qVePBFWet-3UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 2:10 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 1:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 11:55 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 8:55 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 12:47 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In the past this only led to compilation issues. Also the small amount of
> > > > > extra .text shouldn't really matter compared to the entire nouveau driver
> > > > > anyway.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >         select DRM_TTM_HELPER
> > > > > -       select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE if DRM_NOUVEAU_BACKLIGHT
> > > > > -       select ACPI_VIDEO if ACPI && X86 && BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE && INPUT
> > > > > +       select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
> > > > > +       select ACPI_VIDEO if ACPI && X86 && INPUT
> > > > >         select X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES if ACPI && X86
> > > > >         select ACPI_WMI if ACPI && X86
> > > >
> > > > I think the logic needs to be the reverse: instead of 'select
> > > > BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE',
> > > > this should be 'depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE', and the same for ACPI_VIDEO.
> > > >
> > > > We may want to add 'default DRM || FB' to BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE in the
> > > > process so we don't lose it for users doing 'make oldconfig' or 'make defconfig'
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think the problem with
> > > "depends" is that the user needs to enable backlight support first
> > > before even seeing nouveau and I don't know if that makes sense. But
> > > maybe "default" is indeed helping here in this case.
> >
> > In general, no driver should ever 'select' a subsystem. Otherwise you end up
> > with two problems:
> >
> > - enabling this one driver suddenly makes all other drivers that have
> > a dependency
> >   on this visible, and some of those might have a 'default y', so you
> > end up with
> >   a ton of stuff in the kernel that would otherwise not be there.
> >
> > - It becomes impossible to turn it off as long as some driver has that 'select'.
> >   This is the pretty much the same problem as the one you describe, just
> >    the other side of it.
> >
> > - You run into dependency loops that prevent a successful build when some
> >    other driver has a 'depends on'. Preventing these loops was the main
> >    reason I said we should do this change.
> >
> > In theory we could change the other 85 drivers that use 'depends on' today,
> > and make BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE a hidden symbol that only ever
> > selected by the drivers that need it. This would avoid the third problem but
> > not the other one.
> >
> >       Arnd
> >
>
> I see. Yeah, I guess we can do it this way then. I just wasn't aware
> of the bigger picture here. Thanks for explaining.

yeah... that doesn't work. So the issue is, that X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES
is a little bit in the way. If I remove the select
X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES then I guess problems once ACPI is enabled, but
if I keep it, I get cyclic dep errors :/

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: ML nouveau <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau: make backlight support non optional
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 14:51:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACO55tuceMUz2pgOM23wvcmtaTqbo6S6rCB+mfLptqJRt=fMWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACO55tsoi2akTKvFdz3p48UHRjFXDW7dUnOM8qVePBFWet-3UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 2:10 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 1:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 11:55 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 8:55 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 12:47 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In the past this only led to compilation issues. Also the small amount of
> > > > > extra .text shouldn't really matter compared to the entire nouveau driver
> > > > > anyway.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >         select DRM_TTM_HELPER
> > > > > -       select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE if DRM_NOUVEAU_BACKLIGHT
> > > > > -       select ACPI_VIDEO if ACPI && X86 && BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE && INPUT
> > > > > +       select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
> > > > > +       select ACPI_VIDEO if ACPI && X86 && INPUT
> > > > >         select X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES if ACPI && X86
> > > > >         select ACPI_WMI if ACPI && X86
> > > >
> > > > I think the logic needs to be the reverse: instead of 'select
> > > > BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE',
> > > > this should be 'depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE', and the same for ACPI_VIDEO.
> > > >
> > > > We may want to add 'default DRM || FB' to BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE in the
> > > > process so we don't lose it for users doing 'make oldconfig' or 'make defconfig'
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think the problem with
> > > "depends" is that the user needs to enable backlight support first
> > > before even seeing nouveau and I don't know if that makes sense. But
> > > maybe "default" is indeed helping here in this case.
> >
> > In general, no driver should ever 'select' a subsystem. Otherwise you end up
> > with two problems:
> >
> > - enabling this one driver suddenly makes all other drivers that have
> > a dependency
> >   on this visible, and some of those might have a 'default y', so you
> > end up with
> >   a ton of stuff in the kernel that would otherwise not be there.
> >
> > - It becomes impossible to turn it off as long as some driver has that 'select'.
> >   This is the pretty much the same problem as the one you describe, just
> >    the other side of it.
> >
> > - You run into dependency loops that prevent a successful build when some
> >    other driver has a 'depends on'. Preventing these loops was the main
> >    reason I said we should do this change.
> >
> > In theory we could change the other 85 drivers that use 'depends on' today,
> > and make BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE a hidden symbol that only ever
> > selected by the drivers that need it. This would avoid the third problem but
> > not the other one.
> >
> >       Arnd
> >
>
> I see. Yeah, I guess we can do it this way then. I just wasn't aware
> of the bigger picture here. Thanks for explaining.

yeah... that doesn't work. So the issue is, that X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES
is a little bit in the way. If I remove the select
X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES then I guess problems once ACPI is enabled, but
if I keep it, I get cyclic dep errors :/


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-24 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-23 22:46 [PATCH] nouveau: make backlight support non optional Karol Herbst
2021-07-23 22:46 ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-23 22:46 ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-07-24  6:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24  6:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24  6:55   ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24  9:54   ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-24  9:54     ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-24  9:54     ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 11:56     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 11:56       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 11:56       ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 12:10       ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 12:10         ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 12:10         ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 12:51         ` Karol Herbst [this message]
2021-07-24 12:51           ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 12:51           ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 14:04           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 14:04             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 14:04             ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 14:13             ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 14:13               ` Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 14:13               ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-07-24 14:58               ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 14:58                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-24 14:58                 ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-04 14:10                 ` [PATCH] depend on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE for more devices Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 14:10                   ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 14:19                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-04 14:19                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-04 14:19                     ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-04 14:43                     ` Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 14:43                       ` Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 14:43                       ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 18:59                       ` Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 18:59                         ` Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 18:59                         ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 21:09                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-04 21:09                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-04 21:09                           ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-04 22:01                           ` Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 22:01                             ` Karol Herbst
2021-08-04 22:01                             ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-08-05  6:50                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-05  6:50                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-05  6:50                               ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-09 13:20                 ` [PATCH] nouveau: make backlight support non optional Jani Nikula
2021-08-09 13:20                   ` [Nouveau] " Jani Nikula
2021-08-09 13:30                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-09 13:30                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-09 13:30                     ` [Nouveau] " Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACO55tuceMUz2pgOM23wvcmtaTqbo6S6rCB+mfLptqJRt=fMWA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.