From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: mmci: Support odd block sizes for ux500v2 and qcom variant
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:17:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZhMjWyWQav1HhmfDkvUxOU8gGGbYJrd-tRXw8u+d2-Rg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqx-0J0ck-hyeJsX8LrOP+BWiS6PihLd1Y3EMoXX+qYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:06 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
(...)
> There is no need to keep my authorship of the patch, it's very much
> different than the original. I would rather replace it that with a
> suggested-by tag.
OK
> This is too early in the series. You need to deal with the DMA and pio
> issues, before releasing this constraint.
>
> In other words, I would rather split this patch in two pieces. One
> patch dealing with dma submit error path, placed first in the series
> and another patch that adds the odd block sizes variant and releases
> the constraint, which should comes last.
>
> Makes sense?
Sure thing, I fix. We need to get the whole slew tested first then
I'll collect the Tested-by's and reorder and split.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: mmci: Support odd block sizes for ux500v2 and qcom variant
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:17:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZhMjWyWQav1HhmfDkvUxOU8gGGbYJrd-tRXw8u+d2-Rg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqx-0J0ck-hyeJsX8LrOP+BWiS6PihLd1Y3EMoXX+qYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:06 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
(...)
> There is no need to keep my authorship of the patch, it's very much
> different than the original. I would rather replace it that with a
> suggested-by tag.
OK
> This is too early in the series. You need to deal with the DMA and pio
> issues, before releasing this constraint.
>
> In other words, I would rather split this patch in two pieces. One
> patch dealing with dma submit error path, placed first in the series
> and another patch that adds the odd block sizes variant and releases
> the constraint, which should comes last.
>
> Makes sense?
Sure thing, I fix. We need to get the whole slew tested first then
I'll collect the Tested-by's and reorder and split.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 7:53 [PATCH 0/3] MMCI odd buffer alignment fixes Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 7:53 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 7:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: mmci: Support odd block sizes for ux500v2 and qcom variant Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 7:53 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 10:08 ` Ludovic BARRE
2019-11-13 10:08 ` Ludovic BARRE
2019-11-13 11:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-13 11:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-13 13:17 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2019-11-13 13:17 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 7:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: mmci: Bail out from odd DMA on Ux500 Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 7:53 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 10:29 ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-11-13 10:29 ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-11-13 10:54 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-13 10:54 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-13 7:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: mmci: Proper PIO residue handling Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 7:53 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 13:24 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 13:24 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-13 14:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-13 14:03 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdZhMjWyWQav1HhmfDkvUxOU8gGGbYJrd-tRXw8u+d2-Rg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
--cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.