All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	Mikhail Kurinnoi <viewizard@viewizard.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Make it practical to ship EVM signatures
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:09:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACdnJuv11cjDHac6M+iofB7yA=on2N5ZiqXz8onZZPtGFgo7yA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506825397.5691.186.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 13:09 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> If the security metadata is different then copying another
>> security.evm will fail, surely?
>
> A copy of the file could exist with a valid hmac on the system with
> different security xattrs.  Without the inode/uuid, the xattrs could
> be cut & pasted.

So we have /usr/bin/a and /usr/bin/b, which are identical but have
different security contexts. Outside some unusual cases, if I have the
ability to modify /usr/bin/b's security.evm, I can delete /usr/bin/b.
I can then also just do:

ln -f /usr/bin/a /usr/bin/b

and /usr/bin/b now has the same security context as /usr/bin/a,
including security.evm.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-27 22:16 RFC: Make it practical to ship EVM signatures Matthew Garrett
2017-09-27 22:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] IMA: Allow EVM validation on appraisal even without a symmetric key Matthew Garrett
2017-10-01  2:08   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-02 17:02     ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-02 19:41       ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-27 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] EVM: Add infrastructure for making EVM fields optional Matthew Garrett
2017-09-27 22:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] EVM: Allow userland to override the default EVM attributes Matthew Garrett
2017-09-27 22:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] EVM: Add an hmac_ng xattr format Matthew Garrett
2017-09-27 22:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] EVM: Write out HMAC xattrs in the new format Matthew Garrett
2017-09-27 22:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] EVM: Add a new digital signature format Matthew Garrett
2017-09-28 20:12 ` RFC: Make it practical to ship EVM signatures Mimi Zohar
2017-09-28 21:13   ` Matthew Garrett
2017-09-29  0:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-29 18:09       ` Matthew Garrett
2017-09-29 19:02         ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-29 19:17           ` Matthew Garrett
2017-09-29 20:01             ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-29 20:09               ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-01  2:36                 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-02 17:09                   ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2017-10-02 19:54                     ` Mimi Zohar
     [not found]                       ` <CACdnJutYw7Pgh-EwWuwp9Wz+5KzoreZVr+c6UV30zC__8FZSVA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                         ` <1506974574.5691.304.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-10-02 20:07                           ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-09 17:51                 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-09 17:59                   ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-09 18:15                     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-09 18:18                       ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-09 18:40                         ` Mimi Zohar
     [not found]                           ` <20171009232314.545de76a@totoro>
     [not found]                             ` <1507583449.3748.46.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]                               ` <20171010003326.6409ae23@totoro>
2017-10-09 21:40                                 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-09 23:10                                   ` Mikhail Kurinnoi
2017-10-10 19:07                                     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-12 23:09                                       ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-18 19:48                                         ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-18 20:30                                           ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18 20:37                                             ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-18 21:02                                               ` Mikhail Kurinnoi
2017-10-18 21:07                                               ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-19 10:14                                                 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-19 11:43                                                   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-19 17:08                                                   ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-19 18:38                                                     ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-19 10:36                                                 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-19 11:45                                                   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-02 14:53           ` Roberto Sassu
2017-10-02  8:55       ` Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACdnJuv11cjDHac6M+iofB7yA=on2N5ZiqXz8onZZPtGFgo7yA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viewizard@viewizard.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.