Re: [PATCH 12/14] drm/exynos: mic: clean up drm_bridge_add call

From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
To: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Vetter, Daniel" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] drm/exynos: mic: clean up drm_bridge_add call
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:12:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACvgo51t-WrV03hEsWGkGDqJQddUJyiH9TduaBd74o3qWBgh_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1574b93d-08ba-ef58-4250-e51a0112e900@codeaurora.org>

On 5 July 2017 at 10:14, Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2017 02:35 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017년 07월 05일 18:00에 Archit Taneja 이(가) 쓴 글:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2017 02:12 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch removes unnecessary checking of return value.
>>>>
>>>> Ps. this patch depends on below one,
>>>>      http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg145687.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this one^ go via the exynos pull req or drm-misc? If there won't
>>> be any conflicts, we could get both the patches through drm-misc to
>>> keep things simple.
>>
>>
>> exynos pull it would be better. I will pick this up. :)
>
>
> If patch # 1/14 goes through drm-misc, and the exynos patch goes through
> exynos pull, the drm-misc branch would break. That's the reason I
> preferred the exynos patches to go via misc.
>
As mentioned in 1/14:

If 1/14 is applied before the rest of the series all the drivers
(addressed with 2-14) will fail to build.
I think...

-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel