All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] drm/panel: panel-simple: Add missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() calls
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:08:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VnJB_6PMo3FQt8djYDD7h0s=sc9TAbKLQMe-y+43Z3NQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKwK+lkcHMwAosLn@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

Hi,

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:22 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:08:58PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The PM Runtime docs specifically call out the need to call
> > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() in the remove() callback if
> > pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() was called in probe():
> >
> > > Drivers in ->remove() callback should undo the runtime PM changes done
> > > in ->probe(). Usually this means calling pm_runtime_disable(),
> > > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() etc.
>
> ~/src/kernel/linux $ git grep pm_runtime_use_autosuspend -- drivers | wc -l
> 209
> ~/src/kernel/linux $ git grep pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend -- drivers | wc -l
> 80
>
> Seems like a lost battle :-(
>
> The fix is right, but I wonder if this shouldn't be handled
> automatically by the runtime PM core. The runtime PM API is notoriously
> difficult to use correctly.

No kidding.


> > We should do this. This fixes a warning splat that I saw when I was
> > testing out the panel-simple's remove().
> >
> > Fixes: 3235b0f20a0a ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare / prepare")
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

Thanks! I have pushed just this patch for now.

-Doug

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] drm/panel: panel-simple: Add missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() calls
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:08:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VnJB_6PMo3FQt8djYDD7h0s=sc9TAbKLQMe-y+43Z3NQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKwK+lkcHMwAosLn@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

Hi,

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:22 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:08:58PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The PM Runtime docs specifically call out the need to call
> > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() in the remove() callback if
> > pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() was called in probe():
> >
> > > Drivers in ->remove() callback should undo the runtime PM changes done
> > > in ->probe(). Usually this means calling pm_runtime_disable(),
> > > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() etc.
>
> ~/src/kernel/linux $ git grep pm_runtime_use_autosuspend -- drivers | wc -l
> 209
> ~/src/kernel/linux $ git grep pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend -- drivers | wc -l
> 80
>
> Seems like a lost battle :-(
>
> The fix is right, but I wonder if this shouldn't be handled
> automatically by the runtime PM core. The runtime PM API is notoriously
> difficult to use correctly.

No kidding.


> > We should do this. This fixes a warning splat that I saw when I was
> > testing out the panel-simple's remove().
> >
> > Fixes: 3235b0f20a0a ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare / prepare")
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

Thanks! I have pushed just this patch for now.

-Doug

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-24 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 20:08 [PATCH v7 00/10] drm: Fix EDID reading on ti-sn65dsi86 by introducing the DP AUX bus Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:08 ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:08 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] drm/panel: panel-simple: Add missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() calls Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:08   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-24 20:22   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-05-24 20:22     ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-05-24 21:08     ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2021-05-24 21:08       ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-17 20:08 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] dt-bindings: display: simple: List hpd properties in panel-simple Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:08   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-18 12:41   ` Rob Herring
2021-05-18 12:41     ` Rob Herring
2021-05-18 13:58     ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-18 13:58       ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-22 10:38       ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-22 10:38         ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add aux-bus child Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-19 20:01   ` Rob Herring
2021-05-19 20:01     ` Rob Herring
2021-05-19 21:06     ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-19 21:06       ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-20 13:25       ` Rob Herring
2021-05-20 13:25         ` Rob Herring
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] drm: Introduce the DP AUX bus Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-22 10:34   ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-22 10:34     ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] drm/panel: panel-simple: Allow panel-simple be a DP AUX endpoint device Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] drm/panel: panel-simple: Stash DP AUX bus; allow using it for DDC Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Promote the AUX channel to its own sub-dev Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add support for the DP AUX bus Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-22 10:35   ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-22 10:35     ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-24 20:29   ` Lyude Paul
2021-05-24 20:29     ` Lyude Paul
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Don't read EDID blob over DDC Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: Move panel under the bridge chip Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:09   ` Douglas Anderson
2021-05-22 10:40   ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-22 10:40     ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-19 21:41 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] drm: Fix EDID reading on ti-sn65dsi86 by introducing the DP AUX bus Lyude Paul
2021-05-19 21:41   ` Lyude Paul
2021-05-21 23:07 ` Lyude Paul
2021-05-21 23:07   ` Lyude Paul
2021-05-24 15:14   ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-24 15:14     ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD=FV=VnJB_6PMo3FQt8djYDD7h0s=sc9TAbKLQMe-y+43Z3NQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=steev@kali.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.