From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/msm/dpu: allow just single IRQ callback
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53q2BKcZPUwsesPxx6KktTsakpbjnJQzUceE+fFzWfe8g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217043148.480898-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-16 20:31:45)
> DPU interrupts code allows multiple callbacks per interrut. In reality
> none of the interrupts is shared between blocks (and will probably never
> be). Drop support for registering multiple callbacks per interrupt to
> simplify interrupt handling code.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/msm/dpu: allow just single IRQ callback
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53q2BKcZPUwsesPxx6KktTsakpbjnJQzUceE+fFzWfe8g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217043148.480898-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-16 20:31:45)
> DPU interrupts code allows multiple callbacks per interrut. In reality
> none of the interrupts is shared between blocks (and will probably never
> be). Drop support for registering multiple callbacks per interrupt to
> simplify interrupt handling code.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 4:31 [PATCH v3 0/6] drm/msm/dpu: simplify IRQ helpers Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/msm/dpu: remove extra wrappers around dpu_core_irq Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/msm/dpu: remove always-true argument of dpu_core_irq_read() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/msm/dpu: allow just single IRQ callback Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-03 21:20 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2022-03-03 21:20 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-17 4:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/msm/dpu: get rid of dpu_encoder_helper_(un)register_irq Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/msm/dpu: remove struct dpu_encoder_irq Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-03 21:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-03-03 21:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-17 4:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/msm/dpu: pass irq to dpu_encoder_helper_wait_for_irq() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-17 4:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] drm/msm/dpu: simplify IRQ helpers Stephen Boyd
2022-03-03 21:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-03-03 21:47 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-03-03 21:47 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-03-03 21:52 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-03 21:52 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAE-0n53q2BKcZPUwsesPxx6KktTsakpbjnJQzUceE+fFzWfe8g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.