Re: [PATCH V8 00/14] drm/exynos: few patches to enhance bridge chip support

From: Ajay kumar <ajaynumb@gmail.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@google.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Pannaga Bhushan Reddy Patel <bhushan.r@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Prashanth G <prashanth.g@samsung.com>,
	Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/14] drm/exynos: few patches to enhance bridge chip support
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:26:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEC9eQNna0nMVWTCUfoiiuAkYzPS8iKXGtfsL1S-MkZXpFi6xA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BD3943.80402@collabora.co.uk>

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> On 01/19/2015 05:30 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>
>>> I know you probably are very busy but it would be great if you can take a look
>>> to this series to avoid another kernel release to be missed since we are already
>>> at v3.19-rc5.
>>>
>>> Only this version was posted 2 months ago and the first version of the series
>>> was sent on May, 2014 so it has been on the list for almost a year now...
>>>
>>> Tomi and Laurent had already agreed with the DT binging so I think that we can
>>> already merge these and if there are any remaining issues, those can be fixed
>>> during the 3.20 -rc cycle.
>>
>> I see only a single Tested-by on this series and that seems to be with a
>> bunch of out-of-tree patches applied on top. Does this now actually work
>> applied on top of upstream? Also it seems like many people actually want
>> this to get merged but there's been no Reviewed-bys and only a single
>> Tested-by? Is that as good as it's going to get?
>>
>
> Good point, I provided some feedback on an early version of the series but I'm not
> an DRM expert so I couldn't review it in detail to provide my Reviewed-by.
>
> I did provide my Tested-by a long time ago though but looking at the patches it
> seems those were dropped so here goes again:
>
> For the whole series on an Exynos5420 Peach Pit and an Exynos5250 Snow Chromebooks:
>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
>
>> Also I think the last update was that Ajay was going to resend this
>> based on v3.19-rc1 or something. Is that still going to happen?
>> Otherwise I can probably try to apply as-is, but not sure how well it
>> will.
>>
>
> Ajay,
>
> Are you going to rebase and resend this series with all the provided tags? Gustavo
> and I have a rebased branch on top of 3.19-rc5 and one of us can post your series if
> you are not planning to do it.
Yes, in a day or so. I am currently rebasing on 3.19-rc5 linux-next.
I will add Tested-by from from Rahul, Javier, Inki, Sjoerd, and Gustavo.
Only Inki has acked this till now. So, I will add Inki's Acked-by.

Ajay

> Laurent and Tomi,
>
> You said that you are OK with the DT bindings now, does that count as an Acked-by or
> Reviewed-by for you at least for the DT bindings changes in the series?
>
>> Thierry
>>
>
> Best regards,
> Javier
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel