Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags

From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 22:02:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFqt6zbvYKQS0NO3x9d45ubwf_MdEf67x1=xUHLb+ippCFmeQg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549455025-17706-2-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:01 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The memblock API provides dedicated helpers to set or clear a flag on a
> memory region, e.g. memblock_{mark,clear}_hotplug().
>
> The memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags() functions are used only by the
> memblock internal function that adjusts the region flags.
> Drop these functions and use open-coded implementation instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memblock.h | 12 ------------
>  mm/memblock.c            |  9 ++++++---
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 71c9e32..32a9a6b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -317,18 +317,6 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *idx, struct zone *zone,
>         for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, &memblock.reserved, \
>                                nid, flags, p_start, p_end, p_nid)
>
> -static inline void memblock_set_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r,
> -                                            enum memblock_flags flags)
> -{
> -       r->flags |= flags;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void memblock_clear_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r,
> -                                              enum memblock_flags flags)
> -{
> -       r->flags &= ~flags;
> -}
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
>  int memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
>                       struct memblock_type *type, int nid);
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 0151a5b..af5fe8e 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -851,11 +851,14 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++)
> +       for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++) {
> +               struct memblock_region *r = &type->regions[i];

Is it fine if we drop this memblock_region *r altogether ?

> +
>                 if (set)
> -                       memblock_set_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag);
> +                       r->flags |= flag;
>                 else
> -                       memblock_clear_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag);
> +                       r->flags &= ~flag;
> +       }
>
>         memblock_merge_regions(type);
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.7.4
>