Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support

From: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:03:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG9=OMOMrFcy6UdL8-3wZGwOr1nqLm1bpvL+G1g2dvBhJWU2Kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFp7ykxGFUbPG1ON@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 9:58 AM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 06 2023 at  2:29P -0400,
> Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > dm-thinpool uses the provision request to provision
> > blocks for a dm-thin device. dm-thinpool currently does not
> > pass through REQ_OP_PROVISION to underlying devices.
> >
> > For shared blocks, provision requests will break sharing and copy the
> > contents of the entire block. Additionally, if 'skip_block_zeroing'
> > is not set, dm-thin will opt to zero out the entire range as a part
> > of provisioning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > index 2b13c949bd72..3f94f53ac956 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ struct pool {
> >
> >       process_bio_fn process_bio;
> >       process_bio_fn process_discard;
> > +     process_bio_fn process_provision;
> >
> >       process_cell_fn process_cell;
> >       process_cell_fn process_discard_cell;
> > @@ -913,7 +914,8 @@ static void __inc_remap_and_issue_cell(void *context,
> >       struct bio *bio;
> >
> >       while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&cell->bios))) {
> > -             if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> > +             if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> > +                 bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION)
> >                       bio_list_add(&info->defer_bios, bio);
> >               else {
> >                       inc_all_io_entry(info->tc->pool, bio);
> > @@ -1245,8 +1247,8 @@ static int io_overlaps_block(struct pool *pool, struct bio *bio)
> >
> >  static int io_overwrites_block(struct pool *pool, struct bio *bio)
> >  {
> > -     return (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) &&
> > -             io_overlaps_block(pool, bio);
> > +     return (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) && io_overlaps_block(pool, bio) &&
> > +            bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_PROVISION;
> >  }
> >
> >  static void save_and_set_endio(struct bio *bio, bio_end_io_t **save,
> > @@ -1953,6 +1955,51 @@ static void provision_block(struct thin_c *tc, struct bio *bio, dm_block_t block
> >       }
> >  }
> >
> > +static void process_provision_bio(struct thin_c *tc, struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > +     int r;
> > +     struct pool *pool = tc->pool;
> > +     dm_block_t block = get_bio_block(tc, bio);
> > +     struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell;
> > +     struct dm_cell_key key;
> > +     struct dm_thin_lookup_result lookup_result;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * If cell is already occupied, then the block is already
> > +      * being provisioned so we have nothing further to do here.
> > +      */
> > +     build_virtual_key(tc->td, block, &key);
> > +     if (bio_detain(pool, &key, bio, &cell))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     if (tc->requeue_mode) {
> > +             cell_requeue(pool, cell);
> > +             return;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     r = dm_thin_find_block(tc->td, block, 1, &lookup_result);
> > +     switch (r) {
> > +     case 0:
> > +             if (lookup_result.shared) {
> > +                     process_shared_bio(tc, bio, block, &lookup_result, cell);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     bio_endio(bio);
> > +                     cell_defer_no_holder(tc, cell);
> > +             }
> > +             break;
> > +     case -ENODATA:
> > +             provision_block(tc, bio, block, cell);
> > +             break;
> > +
> > +     default:
> > +             DMERR_LIMIT("%s: dm_thin_find_block() failed: error = %d",
> > +                         __func__, r);
> > +             cell_defer_no_holder(tc, cell);
> > +             bio_io_error(bio);
> > +             break;
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void process_cell(struct thin_c *tc, struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell)
> >  {
> >       int r;
> > @@ -2228,6 +2275,8 @@ static void process_thin_deferred_bios(struct thin_c *tc)
> >
> >               if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> >                       pool->process_discard(tc, bio);
> > +             else if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION)
> > +                     pool->process_provision(tc, bio);
> >               else
> >                       pool->process_bio(tc, bio);
> >
> > @@ -2579,6 +2628,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd);
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_bio_fail;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell_fail;
> >               pool->process_discard_cell = process_cell_fail;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping_fail;
> > @@ -2592,6 +2642,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd);
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio_read_only;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_bio_success;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell_read_only;
> >               pool->process_discard_cell = process_cell_success;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping_fail;
> > @@ -2612,6 +2663,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               pool->out_of_data_space = true;
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio_read_only;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_discard_bio;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell_read_only;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping;
> >               set_discard_callbacks(pool);
> > @@ -2628,6 +2680,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               dm_pool_metadata_read_write(pool->pmd);
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_discard_bio;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_provision_bio;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping;
> >               set_discard_callbacks(pool);
> > @@ -2749,7 +2802,8 @@ static int thin_bio_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
> >               return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> >       }
> >
> > -     if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) {
> > +     if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> > +         bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION) {
> >               thin_defer_bio_with_throttle(tc, bio);
> >               return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> >       }
> > @@ -3396,6 +3450,9 @@ static int pool_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
> >       pt->adjusted_pf = pt->requested_pf = pf;
> >       ti->num_flush_bios = 1;
> >       ti->limit_swap_bios = true;
> > +     ti->num_provision_bios = 1;
> > +     ti->provision_supported = true;
> > +     ti->max_provision_granularity = true;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * Only need to enable discards if the pool should pass
> > @@ -4114,6 +4171,8 @@ static void pool_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
> >        * The pool uses the same discard limits as the underlying data
> >        * device.  DM core has already set this up.
> >        */
> > +
> > +     limits->max_provision_sectors = pool->sectors_per_block;
> >  }
> >
> >  static struct target_type pool_target = {
> > @@ -4288,6 +4347,9 @@ static int thin_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
> >               ti->max_discard_granularity = true;
> >       }
> >
> > +     ti->num_provision_bios = 1;
> > +     ti->provision_supported = true;
> > +
>
> We need this in thin_ctr: ti->max_provision_granularity = true;
>
> More needed in the thin target than thin-pool; otherwise provision bio
> issued to thin devices won't be split appropriately.  But I do think
> its fine to set in both thin_ctr and pool_ctr.
>
> Otherwise, looks good.
>
Thanks! I'll add it to the next iteration (in addition to any other
feedback that's added to v6).

Given that this series covers multiple subsystems, would there be a
preferred way of queueing this for merge?

Best
Sarthak

> Thanks,
> Mike