From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
To: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
hui.liu@mediatek.com, Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>,
Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@mediatek.com>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] pinctrl: mediatek: support rsel feature
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:35:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5Fp0coJn1zVHZU_TWQyqtuc0EEPU4a7uaEsjX6u6EEhzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922025640.11600-5-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:59 AM Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> This patch supports rsel(resistance selection) feature for I2C pins.
> It provides more resistance selection solution in different ICs.
> It provides rsel define and si unit solution by identifying
> "mediatek,rsel_resistance_in_si_unit" property in pio dtsi node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 231 +++++++++++++++---
> .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h | 45 ++++
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c | 60 +++--
> 3 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> index 5b3b048725cc..e84001923aaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> @@ -661,6 +661,181 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int mtk_hw_pin_rsel_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> + const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> + u32 pullup, u32 arg, u32 *rsel_val)
> +{
> + const struct mtk_pin_rsel *rsel;
> + int check;
> + bool found = false;
> +
> + rsel = hw->soc->pin_rsel;
> +
> + for (check = 0; check <= hw->soc->npin_rsel - 1; check++) {
> + if (desc->number >= rsel[check].s_pin &&
> + desc->number <= rsel[check].e_pin) {
> + if (pullup) {
> + if (rsel[check].up_rsel == arg) {
> + found = true;
> + *rsel_val = rsel[check].rsel_index;
> + break;
The code could simply `return 0` after setting *rsel_val, then we don't have
to have the `found` variable.
Unless your goal is to use the last matching value in the case of duplicates,
instead of the first. If that is the case you should add a comment stating
so along with the reason,
And the structure could be written as
if (pin not in range)
continue;
... check value ...
which would decrease the nesting level. Mostly stylistic though.
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (rsel[check].down_rsel == arg) {
> + found = true;
> + *rsel_val = rsel[check].rsel_index;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!found) {
> + dev_err(hw->dev, "Not support rsel value %d Ohm for pin = %d (%s)\n",
> + arg, desc->number, desc->name);
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_rsel(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> + const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> + u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> +{
> + int pu, pd, rsel, err;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_RSEL, &rsel);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_PU, &pu);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_PD, &pd);
mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd() couldn't be reused?
> +
> + if (pu == 0 && pd == 0) {
> + *pullup = 0;
> + *enable = MTK_DISABLE;
> + } else if (pu == 1 && pd == 0) {
> + *pullup = 1;
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit)
> + mtk_rsel_get_si_unit(hw, desc, *pullup, rsel, enable);
> + else
> + *enable = rsel + MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + } else if (pu == 0 && pd == 1) {
> + *pullup = 0;
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit)
> + mtk_rsel_get_si_unit(hw, desc, *pullup, rsel, enable);
> + else
> + *enable = rsel + MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + } else {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> @@ -742,44 +917,40 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> return err;
> }
>
> -int mtk_pinconf_bias_set_combo(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> - const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> - u32 pullup, u32 arg)
> -{
> - int err;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> -
> -out:
> - return err;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_pinconf_bias_set_combo);
> -
> int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> {
> - int err;
> + int err = -ENOTSUPP;
> + u32 try_all_type;
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> + if (hw->soc->pull_type)
> + try_all_type = hw->soc->pull_type[desc->number];
> + else
> + try_all_type = MTK_PULL_TYPE_MASK;
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_rsel(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc,
> + pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE)
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
>
> -out:
> return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> index a6f1bdb2083b..4908c7aedbe0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,22 @@
> #define MTK_ENABLE 1
> #define MTK_PULLDOWN 0
> #define MTK_PULLUP 1
> +#define MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE BIT(0)
> +#define MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE BIT(1)
> +#define MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE BIT(2)
> +/* MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE can select resistance and can be
> + * turned on/off itself. But it can't be selected pull up/down
> + */
> +#define MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE BIT(3)
> +/* MTK_PULL_PU_PD_RSEL_TYPE is a type which is controlled by
> + * MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE and MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE.
> + */
> +#define MTK_PULL_PU_PD_RSEL_TYPE (MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE \
> + | MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)
> +#define MTK_PULL_TYPE_MASK (MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)
>
> #define EINT_NA U16_MAX
> #define NO_EINT_SUPPORT EINT_NA
> @@ -42,6 +58,14 @@
> PIN_FIELD_CALC(_s_pin, _e_pin, 0, _s_addr, _x_addrs, _s_bit, \
> _x_bits, 32, 1)
>
> +#define PIN_RSEL(_s_pin, _e_pin, _rsel_index, _up_resl, _down_rsel) { \
> + .s_pin = _s_pin, \
> + .e_pin = _e_pin, \
> + .rsel_index = _rsel_index, \
> + .up_rsel = _up_resl, \
> + .down_rsel = _down_rsel, \
> + }
> +
> /* List these attributes which could be modified for the pin */
> enum {
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE,
> @@ -67,6 +91,7 @@ enum {
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_E0,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_E1,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_ADV,
> + PINCTRL_PIN_REG_RSEL,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MAX,
> };
>
> @@ -129,6 +154,21 @@ struct mtk_pin_field_calc {
> u8 fixed;
> };
>
> +/* struct mtk_pin_rsel - the structure that provides bias resistance selection.
Since you went through the trouble of documenting all the fields, would
you consider changing this to a kernel-doc style comment? It is similar
to Java-doc, and would be like:
/**
* struct mtk_pin_rsel ......
* @s_pin: ....
* ...
*/
Only the start of the comment block needs to be changed.
See Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst if you are unsure.
> + * @s_pin: the start pin within the rsel range
> + * @e_pin: the end pin within the rsel range
> + * @rsel_index: the rsel bias resistance index
> + * @up_rsel: the pullup rsel bias resistance value
> + * @down_rsel: the pulldown rsel bias resistance value
> + */
> +struct mtk_pin_rsel {
> + u16 s_pin;
> + u16 e_pin;
> + u16 rsel_index;
> + u32 up_rsel;
> + u32 down_rsel;
> +};
> +
> /* struct mtk_pin_reg_calc - the structure that holds all ranges used to
> * determine which register the pin would make use of
> * for certain pin attribute.
> @@ -206,6 +246,9 @@ struct mtk_pin_soc {
> bool ies_present;
> const char * const *base_names;
> unsigned int nbase_names;
> + const unsigned int *pull_type;
> + const struct mtk_pin_rsel *pin_rsel;
> + unsigned int npin_rsel;
>
> /* Specific pinconfig operations */
> int (*bias_disable_set)(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> @@ -254,6 +297,8 @@ struct mtk_pinctrl {
> const char **grp_names;
> /* lock pin's register resource to avoid multiple threads issue*/
> spinlock_t lock;
> + /* identify rsel setting by si unit or rsel define in dts node */
> + bool rsel_si_unit;
> };
>
> void mtk_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl, u8 i, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> index 38aec0177d15..d4e02c5d74a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> @@ -579,8 +579,9 @@ static int mtk_hw_get_value_wrap(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, unsigned int gpio, int
> ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> unsigned int gpio, char *buf, unsigned int buf_len)
> {
> - int pinmux, pullup, pullen, len = 0, r1 = -1, r0 = -1;
> + int pinmux, pullup, pullen, len = 0, r1 = -1, r0 = -1, rsel = -1;
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
> + u32 try_all_type;
>
> if (gpio >= hw->soc->npins)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -591,24 +592,39 @@ ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> pinmux -= hw->soc->nfuncs;
>
> mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo(hw, desc, &pullup, &pullen);
> - if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) {
> - pullen = 0;
> - r1 = 0;
> - r0 = 0;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_01) {
> - pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 0;
> - r0 = 1;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_10) {
> - pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 1;
> - r0 = 0;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_11) {
> +
> + if (hw->soc->pull_type)
> + try_all_type = hw->soc->pull_type[desc->number];
> +
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit && (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)) {
> + rsel = pullen;
> pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 1;
> - r0 = 1;
> - } else if (pullen != MTK_DISABLE && pullen != MTK_ENABLE) {
> - pullen = 0;
> + } else {
> + /* Case for: R1R0 */
> + if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) {
> + pullen = 0;
> + r1 = 0;
> + r0 = 0;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_01) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 0;
> + r0 = 1;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_10) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 1;
> + r0 = 0;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_11) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 1;
> + r0 = 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* Case for: RSEL */
> + if (pullen >= MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000 &&
> + pullen <= MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_111) {
> + rsel = pullen - MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + pullen = 1;
> + }
> }
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len,
> "%03d: %1d%1d%1d%1d%02d%1d%1d%1d%1d",
> @@ -626,6 +642,8 @@ ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> if (r1 != -1) {
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, " (%1d %1d)\n",
> r1, r0);
> + } else if (rsel != -1) {
> + len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, " (%1d)\n", rsel);
> } else {
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, "\n");
> }
> @@ -970,6 +988,12 @@ int mtk_paris_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> hw->nbase = hw->soc->nbase_names;
>
> + if (of_find_property(hw->dev->of_node,
> + "mediatek,rsel_resistance_in_si_unit", NULL))
This new property should be documented in the bindings.
Regards
ChenYu
> + hw->rsel_si_unit = true;
> + else
> + hw->rsel_si_unit = false;
> +
> spin_lock_init(&hw->lock);
>
> err = mtk_pctrl_build_state(pdev);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
To: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
hui.liu@mediatek.com, Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>,
Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@mediatek.com>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] pinctrl: mediatek: support rsel feature
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:35:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5Fp0coJn1zVHZU_TWQyqtuc0EEPU4a7uaEsjX6u6EEhzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922025640.11600-5-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:59 AM Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> This patch supports rsel(resistance selection) feature for I2C pins.
> It provides more resistance selection solution in different ICs.
> It provides rsel define and si unit solution by identifying
> "mediatek,rsel_resistance_in_si_unit" property in pio dtsi node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 231 +++++++++++++++---
> .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h | 45 ++++
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c | 60 +++--
> 3 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> index 5b3b048725cc..e84001923aaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> @@ -661,6 +661,181 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int mtk_hw_pin_rsel_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> + const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> + u32 pullup, u32 arg, u32 *rsel_val)
> +{
> + const struct mtk_pin_rsel *rsel;
> + int check;
> + bool found = false;
> +
> + rsel = hw->soc->pin_rsel;
> +
> + for (check = 0; check <= hw->soc->npin_rsel - 1; check++) {
> + if (desc->number >= rsel[check].s_pin &&
> + desc->number <= rsel[check].e_pin) {
> + if (pullup) {
> + if (rsel[check].up_rsel == arg) {
> + found = true;
> + *rsel_val = rsel[check].rsel_index;
> + break;
The code could simply `return 0` after setting *rsel_val, then we don't have
to have the `found` variable.
Unless your goal is to use the last matching value in the case of duplicates,
instead of the first. If that is the case you should add a comment stating
so along with the reason,
And the structure could be written as
if (pin not in range)
continue;
... check value ...
which would decrease the nesting level. Mostly stylistic though.
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (rsel[check].down_rsel == arg) {
> + found = true;
> + *rsel_val = rsel[check].rsel_index;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!found) {
> + dev_err(hw->dev, "Not support rsel value %d Ohm for pin = %d (%s)\n",
> + arg, desc->number, desc->name);
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_rsel(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> + const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> + u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> +{
> + int pu, pd, rsel, err;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_RSEL, &rsel);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_PU, &pu);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_PD, &pd);
mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd() couldn't be reused?
> +
> + if (pu == 0 && pd == 0) {
> + *pullup = 0;
> + *enable = MTK_DISABLE;
> + } else if (pu == 1 && pd == 0) {
> + *pullup = 1;
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit)
> + mtk_rsel_get_si_unit(hw, desc, *pullup, rsel, enable);
> + else
> + *enable = rsel + MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + } else if (pu == 0 && pd == 1) {
> + *pullup = 0;
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit)
> + mtk_rsel_get_si_unit(hw, desc, *pullup, rsel, enable);
> + else
> + *enable = rsel + MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + } else {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> @@ -742,44 +917,40 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> return err;
> }
>
> -int mtk_pinconf_bias_set_combo(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> - const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> - u32 pullup, u32 arg)
> -{
> - int err;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> -
> -out:
> - return err;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_pinconf_bias_set_combo);
> -
> int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> {
> - int err;
> + int err = -ENOTSUPP;
> + u32 try_all_type;
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> + if (hw->soc->pull_type)
> + try_all_type = hw->soc->pull_type[desc->number];
> + else
> + try_all_type = MTK_PULL_TYPE_MASK;
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_rsel(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc,
> + pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE)
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
>
> -out:
> return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> index a6f1bdb2083b..4908c7aedbe0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,22 @@
> #define MTK_ENABLE 1
> #define MTK_PULLDOWN 0
> #define MTK_PULLUP 1
> +#define MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE BIT(0)
> +#define MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE BIT(1)
> +#define MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE BIT(2)
> +/* MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE can select resistance and can be
> + * turned on/off itself. But it can't be selected pull up/down
> + */
> +#define MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE BIT(3)
> +/* MTK_PULL_PU_PD_RSEL_TYPE is a type which is controlled by
> + * MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE and MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE.
> + */
> +#define MTK_PULL_PU_PD_RSEL_TYPE (MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE \
> + | MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)
> +#define MTK_PULL_TYPE_MASK (MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)
>
> #define EINT_NA U16_MAX
> #define NO_EINT_SUPPORT EINT_NA
> @@ -42,6 +58,14 @@
> PIN_FIELD_CALC(_s_pin, _e_pin, 0, _s_addr, _x_addrs, _s_bit, \
> _x_bits, 32, 1)
>
> +#define PIN_RSEL(_s_pin, _e_pin, _rsel_index, _up_resl, _down_rsel) { \
> + .s_pin = _s_pin, \
> + .e_pin = _e_pin, \
> + .rsel_index = _rsel_index, \
> + .up_rsel = _up_resl, \
> + .down_rsel = _down_rsel, \
> + }
> +
> /* List these attributes which could be modified for the pin */
> enum {
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE,
> @@ -67,6 +91,7 @@ enum {
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_E0,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_E1,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_ADV,
> + PINCTRL_PIN_REG_RSEL,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MAX,
> };
>
> @@ -129,6 +154,21 @@ struct mtk_pin_field_calc {
> u8 fixed;
> };
>
> +/* struct mtk_pin_rsel - the structure that provides bias resistance selection.
Since you went through the trouble of documenting all the fields, would
you consider changing this to a kernel-doc style comment? It is similar
to Java-doc, and would be like:
/**
* struct mtk_pin_rsel ......
* @s_pin: ....
* ...
*/
Only the start of the comment block needs to be changed.
See Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst if you are unsure.
> + * @s_pin: the start pin within the rsel range
> + * @e_pin: the end pin within the rsel range
> + * @rsel_index: the rsel bias resistance index
> + * @up_rsel: the pullup rsel bias resistance value
> + * @down_rsel: the pulldown rsel bias resistance value
> + */
> +struct mtk_pin_rsel {
> + u16 s_pin;
> + u16 e_pin;
> + u16 rsel_index;
> + u32 up_rsel;
> + u32 down_rsel;
> +};
> +
> /* struct mtk_pin_reg_calc - the structure that holds all ranges used to
> * determine which register the pin would make use of
> * for certain pin attribute.
> @@ -206,6 +246,9 @@ struct mtk_pin_soc {
> bool ies_present;
> const char * const *base_names;
> unsigned int nbase_names;
> + const unsigned int *pull_type;
> + const struct mtk_pin_rsel *pin_rsel;
> + unsigned int npin_rsel;
>
> /* Specific pinconfig operations */
> int (*bias_disable_set)(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> @@ -254,6 +297,8 @@ struct mtk_pinctrl {
> const char **grp_names;
> /* lock pin's register resource to avoid multiple threads issue*/
> spinlock_t lock;
> + /* identify rsel setting by si unit or rsel define in dts node */
> + bool rsel_si_unit;
> };
>
> void mtk_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl, u8 i, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> index 38aec0177d15..d4e02c5d74a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> @@ -579,8 +579,9 @@ static int mtk_hw_get_value_wrap(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, unsigned int gpio, int
> ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> unsigned int gpio, char *buf, unsigned int buf_len)
> {
> - int pinmux, pullup, pullen, len = 0, r1 = -1, r0 = -1;
> + int pinmux, pullup, pullen, len = 0, r1 = -1, r0 = -1, rsel = -1;
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
> + u32 try_all_type;
>
> if (gpio >= hw->soc->npins)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -591,24 +592,39 @@ ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> pinmux -= hw->soc->nfuncs;
>
> mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo(hw, desc, &pullup, &pullen);
> - if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) {
> - pullen = 0;
> - r1 = 0;
> - r0 = 0;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_01) {
> - pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 0;
> - r0 = 1;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_10) {
> - pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 1;
> - r0 = 0;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_11) {
> +
> + if (hw->soc->pull_type)
> + try_all_type = hw->soc->pull_type[desc->number];
> +
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit && (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)) {
> + rsel = pullen;
> pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 1;
> - r0 = 1;
> - } else if (pullen != MTK_DISABLE && pullen != MTK_ENABLE) {
> - pullen = 0;
> + } else {
> + /* Case for: R1R0 */
> + if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) {
> + pullen = 0;
> + r1 = 0;
> + r0 = 0;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_01) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 0;
> + r0 = 1;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_10) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 1;
> + r0 = 0;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_11) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 1;
> + r0 = 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* Case for: RSEL */
> + if (pullen >= MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000 &&
> + pullen <= MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_111) {
> + rsel = pullen - MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + pullen = 1;
> + }
> }
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len,
> "%03d: %1d%1d%1d%1d%02d%1d%1d%1d%1d",
> @@ -626,6 +642,8 @@ ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> if (r1 != -1) {
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, " (%1d %1d)\n",
> r1, r0);
> + } else if (rsel != -1) {
> + len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, " (%1d)\n", rsel);
> } else {
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, "\n");
> }
> @@ -970,6 +988,12 @@ int mtk_paris_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> hw->nbase = hw->soc->nbase_names;
>
> + if (of_find_property(hw->dev->of_node,
> + "mediatek,rsel_resistance_in_si_unit", NULL))
This new property should be documented in the bindings.
Regards
ChenYu
> + hw->rsel_si_unit = true;
> + else
> + hw->rsel_si_unit = false;
> +
> spin_lock_init(&hw->lock);
>
> err = mtk_pctrl_build_state(pdev);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
To: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
hui.liu@mediatek.com, Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>,
Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@mediatek.com>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] pinctrl: mediatek: support rsel feature
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:35:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5Fp0coJn1zVHZU_TWQyqtuc0EEPU4a7uaEsjX6u6EEhzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922025640.11600-5-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:59 AM Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> This patch supports rsel(resistance selection) feature for I2C pins.
> It provides more resistance selection solution in different ICs.
> It provides rsel define and si unit solution by identifying
> "mediatek,rsel_resistance_in_si_unit" property in pio dtsi node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 231 +++++++++++++++---
> .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h | 45 ++++
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c | 60 +++--
> 3 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> index 5b3b048725cc..e84001923aaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> @@ -661,6 +661,181 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int mtk_hw_pin_rsel_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> + const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> + u32 pullup, u32 arg, u32 *rsel_val)
> +{
> + const struct mtk_pin_rsel *rsel;
> + int check;
> + bool found = false;
> +
> + rsel = hw->soc->pin_rsel;
> +
> + for (check = 0; check <= hw->soc->npin_rsel - 1; check++) {
> + if (desc->number >= rsel[check].s_pin &&
> + desc->number <= rsel[check].e_pin) {
> + if (pullup) {
> + if (rsel[check].up_rsel == arg) {
> + found = true;
> + *rsel_val = rsel[check].rsel_index;
> + break;
The code could simply `return 0` after setting *rsel_val, then we don't have
to have the `found` variable.
Unless your goal is to use the last matching value in the case of duplicates,
instead of the first. If that is the case you should add a comment stating
so along with the reason,
And the structure could be written as
if (pin not in range)
continue;
... check value ...
which would decrease the nesting level. Mostly stylistic though.
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (rsel[check].down_rsel == arg) {
> + found = true;
> + *rsel_val = rsel[check].rsel_index;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!found) {
> + dev_err(hw->dev, "Not support rsel value %d Ohm for pin = %d (%s)\n",
> + arg, desc->number, desc->name);
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_rsel(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> + const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> + u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> +{
> + int pu, pd, rsel, err;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_RSEL, &rsel);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_PU, &pu);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_PD, &pd);
mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd() couldn't be reused?
> +
> + if (pu == 0 && pd == 0) {
> + *pullup = 0;
> + *enable = MTK_DISABLE;
> + } else if (pu == 1 && pd == 0) {
> + *pullup = 1;
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit)
> + mtk_rsel_get_si_unit(hw, desc, *pullup, rsel, enable);
> + else
> + *enable = rsel + MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + } else if (pu == 0 && pd == 1) {
> + *pullup = 0;
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit)
> + mtk_rsel_get_si_unit(hw, desc, *pullup, rsel, enable);
> + else
> + *enable = rsel + MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + } else {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> @@ -742,44 +917,40 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> return err;
> }
>
> -int mtk_pinconf_bias_set_combo(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> - const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> - u32 pullup, u32 arg)
> -{
> - int err;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> -
> -out:
> - return err;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_pinconf_bias_set_combo);
> -
> int mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> u32 *pullup, u32 *enable)
> {
> - int err;
> + int err = -ENOTSUPP;
> + u32 try_all_type;
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> + if (hw->soc->pull_type)
> + try_all_type = hw->soc->pull_type[desc->number];
> + else
> + try_all_type = MTK_PULL_TYPE_MASK;
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_rsel(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
>
> - err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pu_pd(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE) {
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pullsel_pullen(hw, desc,
> + pullup, enable);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE)
> + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_pupd_r1_r0(hw, desc, pullup, enable);
>
> -out:
> return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> index a6f1bdb2083b..4908c7aedbe0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,22 @@
> #define MTK_ENABLE 1
> #define MTK_PULLDOWN 0
> #define MTK_PULLUP 1
> +#define MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE BIT(0)
> +#define MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE BIT(1)
> +#define MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE BIT(2)
> +/* MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE can select resistance and can be
> + * turned on/off itself. But it can't be selected pull up/down
> + */
> +#define MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE BIT(3)
> +/* MTK_PULL_PU_PD_RSEL_TYPE is a type which is controlled by
> + * MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE and MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE.
> + */
> +#define MTK_PULL_PU_PD_RSEL_TYPE (MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE \
> + | MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)
> +#define MTK_PULL_TYPE_MASK (MTK_PULL_PU_PD_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_PULLSEL_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_PUPD_R1R0_TYPE |\
> + MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)
>
> #define EINT_NA U16_MAX
> #define NO_EINT_SUPPORT EINT_NA
> @@ -42,6 +58,14 @@
> PIN_FIELD_CALC(_s_pin, _e_pin, 0, _s_addr, _x_addrs, _s_bit, \
> _x_bits, 32, 1)
>
> +#define PIN_RSEL(_s_pin, _e_pin, _rsel_index, _up_resl, _down_rsel) { \
> + .s_pin = _s_pin, \
> + .e_pin = _e_pin, \
> + .rsel_index = _rsel_index, \
> + .up_rsel = _up_resl, \
> + .down_rsel = _down_rsel, \
> + }
> +
> /* List these attributes which could be modified for the pin */
> enum {
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE,
> @@ -67,6 +91,7 @@ enum {
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_E0,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_E1,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DRV_ADV,
> + PINCTRL_PIN_REG_RSEL,
> PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MAX,
> };
>
> @@ -129,6 +154,21 @@ struct mtk_pin_field_calc {
> u8 fixed;
> };
>
> +/* struct mtk_pin_rsel - the structure that provides bias resistance selection.
Since you went through the trouble of documenting all the fields, would
you consider changing this to a kernel-doc style comment? It is similar
to Java-doc, and would be like:
/**
* struct mtk_pin_rsel ......
* @s_pin: ....
* ...
*/
Only the start of the comment block needs to be changed.
See Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst if you are unsure.
> + * @s_pin: the start pin within the rsel range
> + * @e_pin: the end pin within the rsel range
> + * @rsel_index: the rsel bias resistance index
> + * @up_rsel: the pullup rsel bias resistance value
> + * @down_rsel: the pulldown rsel bias resistance value
> + */
> +struct mtk_pin_rsel {
> + u16 s_pin;
> + u16 e_pin;
> + u16 rsel_index;
> + u32 up_rsel;
> + u32 down_rsel;
> +};
> +
> /* struct mtk_pin_reg_calc - the structure that holds all ranges used to
> * determine which register the pin would make use of
> * for certain pin attribute.
> @@ -206,6 +246,9 @@ struct mtk_pin_soc {
> bool ies_present;
> const char * const *base_names;
> unsigned int nbase_names;
> + const unsigned int *pull_type;
> + const struct mtk_pin_rsel *pin_rsel;
> + unsigned int npin_rsel;
>
> /* Specific pinconfig operations */
> int (*bias_disable_set)(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> @@ -254,6 +297,8 @@ struct mtk_pinctrl {
> const char **grp_names;
> /* lock pin's register resource to avoid multiple threads issue*/
> spinlock_t lock;
> + /* identify rsel setting by si unit or rsel define in dts node */
> + bool rsel_si_unit;
> };
>
> void mtk_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl, u8 i, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> index 38aec0177d15..d4e02c5d74a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> @@ -579,8 +579,9 @@ static int mtk_hw_get_value_wrap(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, unsigned int gpio, int
> ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> unsigned int gpio, char *buf, unsigned int buf_len)
> {
> - int pinmux, pullup, pullen, len = 0, r1 = -1, r0 = -1;
> + int pinmux, pullup, pullen, len = 0, r1 = -1, r0 = -1, rsel = -1;
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
> + u32 try_all_type;
>
> if (gpio >= hw->soc->npins)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -591,24 +592,39 @@ ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> pinmux -= hw->soc->nfuncs;
>
> mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo(hw, desc, &pullup, &pullen);
> - if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) {
> - pullen = 0;
> - r1 = 0;
> - r0 = 0;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_01) {
> - pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 0;
> - r0 = 1;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_10) {
> - pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 1;
> - r0 = 0;
> - } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_11) {
> +
> + if (hw->soc->pull_type)
> + try_all_type = hw->soc->pull_type[desc->number];
> +
> + if (hw->rsel_si_unit && (try_all_type & MTK_PULL_RSEL_TYPE)) {
> + rsel = pullen;
> pullen = 1;
> - r1 = 1;
> - r0 = 1;
> - } else if (pullen != MTK_DISABLE && pullen != MTK_ENABLE) {
> - pullen = 0;
> + } else {
> + /* Case for: R1R0 */
> + if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) {
> + pullen = 0;
> + r1 = 0;
> + r0 = 0;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_01) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 0;
> + r0 = 1;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_10) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 1;
> + r0 = 0;
> + } else if (pullen == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_11) {
> + pullen = 1;
> + r1 = 1;
> + r0 = 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* Case for: RSEL */
> + if (pullen >= MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000 &&
> + pullen <= MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_111) {
> + rsel = pullen - MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000;
> + pullen = 1;
> + }
> }
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len,
> "%03d: %1d%1d%1d%1d%02d%1d%1d%1d%1d",
> @@ -626,6 +642,8 @@ ssize_t mtk_pctrl_show_one_pin(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> if (r1 != -1) {
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, " (%1d %1d)\n",
> r1, r0);
> + } else if (rsel != -1) {
> + len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, " (%1d)\n", rsel);
> } else {
> len += scnprintf(buf + len, buf_len - len, "\n");
> }
> @@ -970,6 +988,12 @@ int mtk_paris_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> hw->nbase = hw->soc->nbase_names;
>
> + if (of_find_property(hw->dev->of_node,
> + "mediatek,rsel_resistance_in_si_unit", NULL))
This new property should be documented in the bindings.
Regards
ChenYu
> + hw->rsel_si_unit = true;
> + else
> + hw->rsel_si_unit = false;
> +
> spin_lock_init(&hw->lock);
>
> err = mtk_pctrl_build_state(pdev);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-22 2:56 [PATCH v13 0/5] Mediatek pinctrl patch on mt8195 Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v13 1/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8195: add rsel define Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v13 2/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8195: change pull up/down description Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-24 1:00 ` Rob Herring
2021-09-24 1:00 ` Rob Herring
2021-09-24 1:00 ` Rob Herring
2021-09-24 6:40 ` zhiyong.tao
2021-09-24 6:40 ` zhiyong.tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v13 3/5] pinctrl: mediatek: fix coding style Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 3:08 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-22 3:08 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-22 3:08 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v13 4/5] pinctrl: mediatek: support rsel feature Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-23 7:35 ` Chen-Yu Tsai [this message]
2021-09-23 7:35 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-23 7:35 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-23 8:38 ` zhiyong.tao
2021-09-23 8:38 ` zhiyong.tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v13 5/5] pinctrl: mediatek: add rsel setting on MT8195 Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 2:56 ` Zhiyong Tao
2021-09-22 9:57 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-22 9:57 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-22 9:57 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-09-23 21:27 ` [PATCH v13 0/5] Mediatek pinctrl patch on mt8195 Linus Walleij
2021-09-23 21:27 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-23 21:27 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-23 21:31 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-23 21:31 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-23 21:31 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGXv+5Fp0coJn1zVHZU_TWQyqtuc0EEPU4a7uaEsjX6u6EEhzA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=biao.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com \
--cc=hui.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=light.hsieh@mediatek.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=seiya.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.