From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Cc: bbrezillon@kernel.org, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>, Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/sun4i: dsi: Change the start delay calculation Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:23:23 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAGb2v6702pRt-=SrOLqfxO5CBQT+bxFgQ6fugA=4SP_vWdqcBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <624512bb9665e0b15244c2bdf230bcfada3a3b98.1548236066.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:54 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote: > > The current calculation for the video start delay in the current DSI driver > is that it is the total vertical size, minus the backporch and sync length, > plus 1. > > However, the Allwinner code has it as the active vertical size, plus the > back porch and the sync length. This doesn't make any difference on the > only panel it has been tested with so far, since in that particular case > the front porch is equal to the sum of the back porch and sync length. > > This is not the case for all panels, obviously, so we need to fix it. Since > the Allwinner code has a bunch of extra code to deal with out of bounds > values, so let's add them as well. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c > index 380fc527a707..e3e4ba90c059 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c > @@ -357,7 +357,12 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_inst_init(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, > static u16 sun6i_dsi_get_video_start_delay(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, > struct drm_display_mode *mode) > { > - return mode->vtotal - (mode->vsync_end - mode->vdisplay) + 1; According to the diagram in include/drm/drm_modes.h , This is active region plus back porch plus 1, as sync_end - display = length of front porch and sync > + u16 delay = (mode->vsync_end + 1) % mode->vtotal; And this actually means (length of active region and front porch and sync pulse plus 1) % total length So I don't really understand what's happening here. And the modulus is unexplained. > + > + if (!delay) > + delay = 1; Same comment as Paul. ChenYu > + > + return delay; > } > > static void sun6i_dsi_setup_burst(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, > -- > git-series 0.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Cc: bbrezillon@kernel.org, dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>, Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/sun4i: dsi: Change the start delay calculation Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:23:23 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAGb2v6702pRt-=SrOLqfxO5CBQT+bxFgQ6fugA=4SP_vWdqcBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <624512bb9665e0b15244c2bdf230bcfada3a3b98.1548236066.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:54 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote: > > The current calculation for the video start delay in the current DSI driver > is that it is the total vertical size, minus the backporch and sync length, > plus 1. > > However, the Allwinner code has it as the active vertical size, plus the > back porch and the sync length. This doesn't make any difference on the > only panel it has been tested with so far, since in that particular case > the front porch is equal to the sum of the back porch and sync length. > > This is not the case for all panels, obviously, so we need to fix it. Since > the Allwinner code has a bunch of extra code to deal with out of bounds > values, so let's add them as well. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c > index 380fc527a707..e3e4ba90c059 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c > @@ -357,7 +357,12 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_inst_init(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, > static u16 sun6i_dsi_get_video_start_delay(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, > struct drm_display_mode *mode) > { > - return mode->vtotal - (mode->vsync_end - mode->vdisplay) + 1; According to the diagram in include/drm/drm_modes.h , This is active region plus back porch plus 1, as sync_end - display = length of front porch and sync > + u16 delay = (mode->vsync_end + 1) % mode->vtotal; And this actually means (length of active region and front porch and sync pulse plus 1) % total length So I don't really understand what's happening here. And the modulus is unexplained. > + > + if (!delay) > + delay = 1; Same comment as Paul. ChenYu > + > + return delay; > } > > static void sun6i_dsi_setup_burst(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, > -- > git-series 0.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 3:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-01-23 15:54 [PATCH 0/4] drm/sun4i: dsi: Add burst mode support Maxime Ripard 2019-01-23 15:54 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-01-23 15:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/sun4i: dsi: Restrict DSI tcon clock divider Maxime Ripard 2019-01-23 15:54 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-01-28 12:08 ` Jagan Teki 2019-01-28 12:08 ` Jagan Teki 2019-01-29 15:39 ` Paul Kocialkowski 2019-01-29 15:39 ` Paul Kocialkowski 2019-01-23 15:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/sun4i: dsi: Change the start delay calculation Maxime Ripard 2019-01-23 15:54 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-01-29 15:40 ` Paul Kocialkowski 2019-01-29 15:40 ` Paul Kocialkowski 2019-01-30 3:23 ` Chen-Yu Tsai [this message] 2019-01-30 3:23 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2019-02-05 16:48 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2019-02-05 16:48 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2019-02-06 14:12 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-02-06 14:12 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-02-06 14:32 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2019-02-06 14:32 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2019-01-23 15:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/sun4i: dsi: Add burst support Maxime Ripard 2019-01-23 15:54 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-02-05 18:28 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2019-02-05 18:28 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2019-02-07 14:27 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-02-07 14:27 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-01-23 15:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/panel: Add Rondo RB070D30 panel Maxime Ripard 2019-01-23 15:54 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-01-26 15:39 ` Sam Ravnborg 2019-01-26 15:39 ` Sam Ravnborg 2019-01-27 5:26 ` Re[2]: " Konstantin Sudakov 2019-01-27 7:33 ` Sam Ravnborg 2019-01-27 7:33 ` Sam Ravnborg 2019-01-29 15:37 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-01-29 15:37 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-01-29 15:48 ` Sam Ravnborg 2019-01-29 15:48 ` Sam Ravnborg 2019-02-05 15:31 ` Maxime Ripard 2019-02-05 15:31 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAGb2v6702pRt-=SrOLqfxO5CBQT+bxFgQ6fugA=4SP_vWdqcBw@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=wens@csie.org \ --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jagan@openedev.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \ --cc=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \ --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \ --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.