Re: GPMI-NAND Status?

From: Koen Beel <koen.beel.barco@gmail.com>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Cc: "Frank LI" <B20596@freescale.com>,
	"Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Lothar Waßmann" <LW@karo-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: GPMI-NAND Status?
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 08:25:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHMSPgNf6V8jYLdxFtznNkvLK-R+YN7gUkfbjrxv0WLTDdJmwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E40C18B.7040609@freescale.com>

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> wrote:
> Hi Koen:
>> Anything is good for me.
>> Could also be useful to make sure we test on the same HW as much as
>> possible and are using the same source tree.
>> HW I have:
>> - mx23evk rev C1
>> - mx23evk rev B2
>> - own target hw using mx23 lqfp-128 chip and different type of ddr and
>> nand.
>>
> My test mx23 board is 169BGA package which is different from yours.
>
> Could you get the 169BGA package board?
>
> I think the DMA timeout is caused by the different package type.

I suppose my mx23evk is right the same as you have (same revision) and
this has the bga169 package. My actual target has lqfp128. But on both
boards I get the same issues.
So I don't think the package type has something to do with the dma
timeout issue. After all the silicon inside is the same thing.

I'm trying to debug a little further.

Regards,
Koen

>
> Best Regards
> Huang Shijie
>
>
>