All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	e@80x24.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, omar.kilani@gmail.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask()
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:26:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjSOh5zmApq2qsNjmY-GMn4CWe9YwdcKPjT+nVoGiDKOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604134117.GA29963@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:41 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> This is the minimal fix for stable, I'll send cleanups later.

Ugh. I htink this is correct, but I wish we had a better and more
intuitive interface.

In particular, since restore_user_sigmask() basically wants to check
for "signal_pending()" anyway (to decide if the mask should be
restored by signal handling or by that function), I really get the
feeling that a lot of these patterns like

> -       restore_user_sigmask(ksig.sigmask, &sigsaved);
> -       if (signal_pending(current) && !ret)
> +
> +       interrupted = signal_pending(current);
> +       restore_user_sigmask(ksig.sigmask, &sigsaved, interrupted);
> +       if (interrupted && !ret)
>                 ret = -ERESTARTNOHAND;

are wrong to begin with, and we really should aim for an interface
which says "tell me whether you completed the system call, and I'll
give you an error return if not".

How about we make restore_user_sigmask() take two return codes: the
'ret' we already have, and the return we would get if there is a
signal pending and w're currently returning zero.

IOW, I think the above could become

        ret = restore_user_sigmask(ksig.sigmask, &sigsaved, ret, -ERESTARTHAND);

instead if we just made the right interface decision.

Hmm?

             Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-04 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 155+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22  3:21 [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask() Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-22 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 15:55   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-22 16:14     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:33       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23  9:03         ` David Laight
2019-05-23 14:59           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:18             ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:36               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:56                 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 18:06                   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23 20:41                     ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23 21:06                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24  9:58                     ` David Laight
2019-05-24 14:10                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 15:16                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24 16:33                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 17:01                           ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-27 15:04                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-28 20:47                               ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 16:57                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 18:42                                   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-28  9:02                             ` David Laight
2019-05-28  9:12                             ` David Laight
2019-05-28 11:37                               ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-28 12:04                                 ` David Laight
2019-05-24 14:19                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 14:29                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24 14:51                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 13:29                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 14:59                     ` David Laight
2019-05-24 15:09                       ` David Laight
2019-05-24 15:46                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 15:44                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 16:40                         ` David Laight
2019-05-23 14:33         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 22:18 ` Chris Down
2019-05-22 22:52   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-22 22:52     ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 16:11 ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 16:54   ` David Laight
2019-05-29 18:50     ` Eric Wong
2019-05-30  9:34       ` David Laight
2019-05-30 13:04       ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 16:56   ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 18:26   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 22:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30  1:54     ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 18:28       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30 14:40     ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 18:37       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30 13:01   ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 15:18     ` David Laight
2019-05-30 16:13       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 15:38     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 15:48       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-30 16:59         ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-30 16:08       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 17:20         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 16:22       ` David Laight
2019-05-30 15:57     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 21:03     ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 13:41   ` [PATCH] signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-04 15:31     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-04 15:31       ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-04 15:57       ` David Laight
2019-06-04 15:57         ` David Laight
2019-06-04 16:37     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-04 18:14       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-06-04 18:35     ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 21:26     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2019-06-04 22:24       ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 23:51       ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-05  9:04         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  8:56       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  9:02       ` David Laight
2019-06-05  9:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  9:58           ` David Laight
2019-06-05 15:58     ` [PATCH -mm 0/1] signal: simplify set_user_sigmask/restore_user_sigmask Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05 15:58       ` [PATCH -mm 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06  0:14         ` kbuild test robot
2019-06-06  1:06         ` kbuild test robot
2019-06-06  7:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06  7:30           ` Sedat Dilek
2019-06-05 17:24       ` [PATCH -mm 0/1] " Linus Torvalds
2019-06-06  9:05         ` David Laight
2019-06-06 11:05           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 11:29             ` David Laight
2019-06-06 12:41               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 13:23                 ` David Laight
2019-06-06 10:22         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 11:32       ` [PATCH -mm V2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 14:08     ` [PATCH 0/2] select: simplify the usage of restore_saved_sigmask_unless() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 14:08       ` [PATCH 1/2] select: change do_poll() to return -ERESTARTNOHAND rather than -EINTR Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-07 18:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-06 14:09       ` [PATCH 2/2] select: shift restore_saved_sigmask_unless() into poll_select_copy_remaining() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-07 21:39       ` [RFC PATCH 0/5]: Removing saved_sigmask Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:39         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:41         ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:41           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:41           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 22:07           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-07 22:07             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-10 16:22           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-10 21:20             ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-11  9:52               ` David Laight
2019-06-11 11:14                 ` David Laight
2019-06-12 12:55                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 12:55                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 12:55                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 13:24                     ` David Laight
2019-06-12 13:24                       ` David Laight
2019-06-12 13:35                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-12 13:35                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-12 13:39                         ` David Laight
2019-06-12 13:39                           ` David Laight
2019-06-11 15:46                 ` David Laight
2019-06-11 15:46                   ` David Laight
2019-06-12 12:40                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 12:40                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 12:40                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 13:45                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-12 14:18                   ` David Laight
2019-06-12 15:11                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 15:11                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 15:37                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-12 15:37                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-13  8:48                     ` David Laight
2019-06-13  8:48                       ` David Laight
2019-06-13  9:43                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-13  9:43                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-13 10:56                         ` David Laight
2019-06-13 10:56                           ` David Laight
2019-06-13 12:43                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-13 12:43                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-11 18:55               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-11 19:02                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-11 19:02                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12  8:39                 ` David Laight
2019-06-12 13:09                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 13:09                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-12 13:09                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:41         ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] signal/kvm: Stop using sigprocmask in kvm_sigset_(activate|deactivate) Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:41           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:41           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:42         ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] signal: Always keep real_blocked in sync with blocked Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:42           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:42           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:43         ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] signal: Remove saved_sigmask Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:43           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:43           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:44         ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] signal: Remove the unnecessary restore_sigmask flag Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:44           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-07 21:44           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-11 18:58         ` [RFC PATCH 0/5]: Removing saved_sigmask Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjSOh5zmApq2qsNjmY-GMn4CWe9YwdcKPjT+nVoGiDKOQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=omar.kilani@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.