Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Only check the first byte for SMBus block read length

From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	HungNien Chen <hn.chen@weidahitech.com>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Pavel Balan <admin@kryma.net>, Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	You-Sheng Yang <vicamo.yang@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Only check the first byte for SMBus block read length
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:07:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve1TgRrKF0_d-7dY6EZU36QszwQ1ezwE03RERKywCxGYg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615160320.GA1949@sultan-book.localdomain>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:06 PM Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:40:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 02:02:54PM -0700, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> > > From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
> > >
> > > SMBus block reads can be broken because the read function will just skip
> > > over bytes it doesn't like until reaching a byte that conforms to the
> > > length restrictions for block reads. This is problematic when it isn't
> > > known if the incoming payload is indeed a conforming block read.
> > >
> > > According to the SMBus specification, block reads will only send the
> > > payload length in the first byte, so we can fix this by only considering
> > > the first byte in a sequence for block read length purposes.
> >
> > I'm wondering if this overlaps with [1]. AFAIU that one is also makes sure that
> > the length is not a garbage.
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20200613104109.2989-1-mans@mansr.com/T/#u
>
> No overlap.

Thanks for clarifying.

> That looks like a similar bug for a different driver. In my case,
> the adapter provides native SMBus support, so emulation is never used. This is
> clear to see by looking at i2c_transfer_buffer_flags(), which only uses the
> master_xfer functions provided by the adapter; it doesn't call the emulation
> path at all.

But do we get an advantage if this can be done in the i2c core instead
(once for all)?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko