All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Stefan Wahren" <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] firmware: raspberrypi: Keep count of all consumers
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf9E7UWVDMs=eRjLjoSN6SVOWw9thNdnR8ruCL6GmY7JQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112163630.17177-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:40 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> wrote:
>
> When unbinding the firmware device we need to make sure it has no
> consumers left. Otherwise we'd leave them with a firmware handle
> pointing at freed memory.
>
> Keep a reference count of all consumers and introduce rpi_firmware_put()
> which will permit automatically decrease the reference count upon
> unbinding consumer drivers.

...

>  /**
> - * rpi_firmware_get - Get pointer to rpi_firmware structure.
>   * @firmware_node:    Pointer to the firmware Device Tree node.
>   *
> + * The reference to rpi_firmware has to be released with rpi_firmware_put().
> + *
>   * Returns NULL is the firmware device is not ready.
>   */
>  struct rpi_firmware *rpi_firmware_get(struct device_node *firmware_node)
>  {
>         struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(firmware_node);
> +       struct rpi_firmware *fw;
>
>         if (!pdev)
>                 return NULL;
>
> -       return platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       fw = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       if (!fw)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&fw->consumers))
> +               return NULL;

Don't we have a more traditional way of doing this, i.e.
try_module_get() coupled with get_device() ?

> +       return fw;
>  }


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"Stefan Wahren" <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] firmware: raspberrypi: Keep count of all consumers
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf9E7UWVDMs=eRjLjoSN6SVOWw9thNdnR8ruCL6GmY7JQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112163630.17177-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:40 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> wrote:
>
> When unbinding the firmware device we need to make sure it has no
> consumers left. Otherwise we'd leave them with a firmware handle
> pointing at freed memory.
>
> Keep a reference count of all consumers and introduce rpi_firmware_put()
> which will permit automatically decrease the reference count upon
> unbinding consumer drivers.

...

>  /**
> - * rpi_firmware_get - Get pointer to rpi_firmware structure.
>   * @firmware_node:    Pointer to the firmware Device Tree node.
>   *
> + * The reference to rpi_firmware has to be released with rpi_firmware_put().
> + *
>   * Returns NULL is the firmware device is not ready.
>   */
>  struct rpi_firmware *rpi_firmware_get(struct device_node *firmware_node)
>  {
>         struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(firmware_node);
> +       struct rpi_firmware *fw;
>
>         if (!pdev)
>                 return NULL;
>
> -       return platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       fw = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       if (!fw)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&fw->consumers))
> +               return NULL;

Don't we have a more traditional way of doing this, i.e.
try_module_get() coupled with get_device() ?

> +       return fw;
>  }


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"Stefan Wahren" <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] firmware: raspberrypi: Keep count of all consumers
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf9E7UWVDMs=eRjLjoSN6SVOWw9thNdnR8ruCL6GmY7JQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112163630.17177-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:40 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> wrote:
>
> When unbinding the firmware device we need to make sure it has no
> consumers left. Otherwise we'd leave them with a firmware handle
> pointing at freed memory.
>
> Keep a reference count of all consumers and introduce rpi_firmware_put()
> which will permit automatically decrease the reference count upon
> unbinding consumer drivers.

...

>  /**
> - * rpi_firmware_get - Get pointer to rpi_firmware structure.
>   * @firmware_node:    Pointer to the firmware Device Tree node.
>   *
> + * The reference to rpi_firmware has to be released with rpi_firmware_put().
> + *
>   * Returns NULL is the firmware device is not ready.
>   */
>  struct rpi_firmware *rpi_firmware_get(struct device_node *firmware_node)
>  {
>         struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(firmware_node);
> +       struct rpi_firmware *fw;
>
>         if (!pdev)
>                 return NULL;
>
> -       return platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       fw = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       if (!fw)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&fw->consumers))
> +               return NULL;

Don't we have a more traditional way of doing this, i.e.
try_module_get() coupled with get_device() ?

> +       return fw;
>  }


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-12 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-12 16:36 [PATCH v4 00/11] Raspberry Pi PoE HAT fan support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] firmware: raspberrypi: Keep count of all consumers Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 17:52   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-11-12 17:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-12 17:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-13  7:26     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-11-13  7:26       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-11-13  7:26       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-11-23 17:19       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-23 17:19         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-23 17:19         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] firmware: raspberrypi: Introduce devm_rpi_firmware_get() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 17:25   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-11-12 17:25     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-11-12 17:25     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-11-13  9:21     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-13  9:21       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-13  9:21       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] clk: bcm: rpi: Release firmware handle on unbind Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] gpio: raspberrypi-exp: " Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] reset: raspberrypi: " Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] soc: bcm: raspberrypi-power: " Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] staging: vchiq: " Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] input: raspberrypi-ts: Release firmware handle when not needed Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] dt-bindings: pwm: Add binding for RPi firmware PWM bus Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] DO NOT MERGE: ARM: dts: Add RPi's official PoE hat support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] pwm: Add Raspberry Pi Firmware based PWM bus Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 16:36   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHp75Vf9E7UWVDMs=eRjLjoSN6SVOWw9thNdnR8ruCL6GmY7JQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.