From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Cc: grygorii.strashko@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, hawk@kernel.org,
xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
aniel@iogearbox.net, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:46:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJpBn1y0odvL97-kP5yzKC+tN=fx178nxigfBfDwXhRhPRvDuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190417174942.11811-4-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:49:42 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> Add XDP support based on rx page_pool allocator, one frame per page.
> This patch was verified with af_xdp and xdp drop. Page pool allocator
> is used with assumption that only one rx_handler is running
> simultaneously. DMA map/unmap is reused from page pool despite there
> is no need to map whole page.
>
> Due to specific of cpsw, the same TX/RX handler can be used by 2
> network devices, so special fields in buffer are added to identify
> an interface the frame is destined to.
>
> XDP prog is common for all channels till appropriate changes are added
> in XDP infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
> @@ -902,22 +947,169 @@ static void cpsw_rx_vlan_encap(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> }
>
> +static inline int cpsw_tx_submit_xdpf(struct cpsw_priv *priv,
> + struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
> + struct cpdma_chan *txch)
> +{
> + struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
> +
> + return cpdma_chan_submit(txch, cpsw_xdpf_to_handle(xdpf), xdpf->data,
> + xdpf->len,
> + priv->emac_port + cpsw->data.dual_emac);
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_xdp_tx_frame(struct cpsw_priv *priv, struct xdp_frame *frame)
> +{
> + struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
> + struct cpsw_meta_xdp *xmeta;
> + struct cpdma_chan *txch;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + frame->metasize = sizeof(struct cpsw_meta_xdp);
> + xmeta = frame->data - frame->metasize;
> + xmeta->ndev = priv->ndev;
> + xmeta->ch = 0;
> +
> + txch = cpsw->txv[0].ch;
> + ret = cpsw_tx_submit_xdpf(priv, frame, txch);
> + if (ret) {
> + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(frame);
> + ret = -1;
> + }
> +
> + /* If there is no more tx desc left free then we need to
> + * tell the kernel to stop sending us tx frames.
> + */
So you're using the same TX ring for XDP and stack? How does that
work? The stack's TX ring has a lock, and can be used from any CPU,
while XDP TX rings are per-PCU, no?
> + if (unlikely(!cpdma_check_free_tx_desc(txch))) {
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->ndev, 0);
> +
> + netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
> +
> + /* Barrier, so that stop_queue visible to other cpus */
> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +
> + if (cpdma_check_free_tx_desc(txch))
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +static struct page_pool *cpsw_create_rx_pool(struct cpsw_common *cpsw)
> +{
> + struct page_pool_params pp_params = { 0 };
> +
> + pp_params.order = 0;
> + pp_params.flags = PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP;
> +
> + /* set it to number of descriptors to be cached from init? */
> + pp_params.pool_size = descs_pool_size;
> + pp_params.nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; /* no numa */
> + pp_params.dma_dir = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
DMA_FROM_DEVICE looks suspicious if you support TX, shouldn't this be
BIDIRECTIONAL?
> + pp_params.dev = cpsw->dev;
> +
> + return page_pool_create(&pp_params);
> +}
> static int cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
> {
> - struct cpdma_chan *ch;
> - struct sk_buff *skb = token;
> - struct sk_buff *new_skb;
> - struct net_device *ndev = skb->dev;
> - int ret = 0, port;
> - struct cpsw_common *cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(ndev);
> + struct page *new_page, *page = token;
> + struct cpsw_meta_xdp *new_xmeta, *xmeta = page_address(page);
> + struct cpsw_common *cpsw = ndev_to_cpsw(xmeta->ndev);
> + int pkt_size = cpsw->rx_packet_max;
> + int ret = 0, port, ch = xmeta->ch;
> + struct page_pool *pool = cpsw->rx_page_pool;
> + int headroom = CPSW_HEADROOM;
> + struct net_device *ndev = xmeta->ndev;
> + int flush = 0;
> struct cpsw_priv *priv;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct xdp_buff xdp;
> + dma_addr_t dma;
>
> if (cpsw->data.dual_emac) {
> port = CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT(status);
> - if (port) {
> + if (port)
> ndev = cpsw->slaves[--port].ndev;
> - skb->dev = ndev;
> - }
> }
>
> if (unlikely(status < 0) || unlikely(!netif_running(ndev))) {
> @@ -930,47 +1122,105 @@ static int cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
> * in reducing of the number of rx descriptor in
> * DMA engine, requeue skb back to cpdma.
> */
> - new_skb = skb;
> + new_page = page;
> + new_xmeta = xmeta;
> goto requeue;
> }
>
> /* the interface is going down, skbs are purged */
> - dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + page_pool_recycle_direct(pool, page);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(ndev, cpsw->rx_packet_max);
> - if (new_skb) {
> - skb_copy_queue_mapping(new_skb, skb);
> - skb_put(skb, len);
> - if (status & CPDMA_RX_VLAN_ENCAP)
> - cpsw_rx_vlan_encap(skb);
> - priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> - if (priv->rx_ts_enabled)
> - cpts_rx_timestamp(cpsw->cpts, skb);
> - skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
> - netif_receive_skb(skb);
> - ndev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
> - ndev->stats.rx_packets++;
> - kmemleak_not_leak(new_skb);
> - } else {
> + new_page = cpsw_alloc_page(cpsw);
> + if (unlikely(!new_page)) {
> + new_page = page;
> + new_xmeta = xmeta;
> ndev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> - new_skb = skb;
> + goto requeue;
> }
> + new_xmeta = page_address(new_page);
> +
> + priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + if (priv->xdp_prog) {
> + xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(&xdp);
> +
> + if (status & CPDMA_RX_VLAN_ENCAP) {
> + xdp.data = (u8 *)xmeta + CPSW_HEADROOM +
> + CPSW_RX_VLAN_ENCAP_HDR_SIZE;
> + xdp.data_end = xdp.data + len -
> + CPSW_RX_VLAN_ENCAP_HDR_SIZE;
> + } else {
> + xdp.data = (u8 *)xmeta + CPSW_HEADROOM;
> + xdp.data_end = xdp.data + len;
> + }
> +
> + xdp.data_hard_start = xmeta;
> + xdp.rxq = &priv->xdp_rxq[ch];
> +
> + ret = cpsw_run_xdp(priv, &cpsw->rxv[ch], &xdp);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == 2)
> + flush = 1;
> +
> + goto requeue;
> + }
> +
> + /* XDP prog might have changed packet data and boundaries */
> + len = xdp.data_end - xdp.data;
> + headroom = xdp.data - xdp.data_hard_start;
> + }
> +
> + /* Build skb and pass it to networking stack if XDP off or XDP prog
> + * returned XDP_PASS
> + */
> + skb = build_skb(xmeta, cpsw_rxbuf_total_len(pkt_size));
> + if (!skb) {
> + ndev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> + page_pool_recycle_direct(pool, page);
> + goto requeue;
> + }
> +
> + skb_reserve(skb, headroom);
> + skb_put(skb, len);
> + skb->dev = ndev;
> + if (status & CPDMA_RX_VLAN_ENCAP)
> + cpsw_rx_vlan_encap(skb);
> + if (priv->rx_ts_enabled)
> + cpts_rx_timestamp(cpsw->cpts, skb);
> + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
> +
> + /* as cpsw handles one packet per NAPI recycle page before increasing
> + * refcounter, holding this in page pool cache
> + */
> + page_pool_recycle_direct(pool, page);
> +
> + /* it's decremented by netstack after what can be allocated
> + * in cpsw_alloc_page()
> + */
> + page_ref_inc(page);
> + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> +
> + ndev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
> + ndev->stats.rx_packets++;
>
> requeue:
> if (netif_dormant(ndev)) {
> - dev_kfree_skb_any(new_skb);
> - return 0;
> + page_pool_recycle_direct(pool, new_page);
> + return flush;
> }
>
> - ch = cpsw->rxv[skb_get_queue_mapping(new_skb)].ch;
> - ret = cpdma_chan_submit(ch, new_skb, new_skb->data,
> - skb_tailroom(new_skb), 0);
> + new_xmeta->ndev = ndev;
> + new_xmeta->ch = ch;
> + dma = new_page->dma_addr + CPSW_HEADROOM;
> + ret = cpdma_chan_submit_mapped(cpsw->rxv[ch].ch, new_page, (void *)dma,
> + pkt_size, 0);
> if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> - dev_kfree_skb_any(new_skb);
> + page_pool_recycle_direct(pool, new_page);
> + else
> + kmemleak_not_leak(new_xmeta); /* Is it needed? */
>
> - return 0;
> + return flush;
> }
On a quick scan I don't see DMA syncs, does the DMA driver takes care
of making sure the DMA sync happens?
> static void cpsw_split_res(struct net_device *ndev)
> @@ -2684,6 +2949,63 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> }
> }
>
> +static int cpsw_xdp_prog_setup(struct net_device *ndev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
> +
> + if (!priv->xdp_prog && !prog)
> + return 0;
> +
> + old_prog = xchg(&priv->xdp_prog, prog);
> + if (old_prog)
> + bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_ndo_bpf(struct net_device *ndev, struct netdev_bpf *bpf)
> +{
> + struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +
> + switch (bpf->command) {
> + case XDP_SETUP_PROG:
> + return cpsw_xdp_prog_setup(ndev, bpf->prog);
> +
> + case XDP_QUERY_PROG:
> + bpf->prog_id = priv->xdp_prog ? priv->xdp_prog->aux->id : 0;
Consider using xdp_attachment_query() and friends. This way you'll
also return the flags.
> + return 0;
> +
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_ndo_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *ndev, int n,
> + struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
> +{
> + struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> + int i, drops = 0;
> +
> + if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> + xdpf = frames[i];
> + if (xdpf->len < CPSW_MIN_PACKET_SIZE) {
> + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
> + drops++;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpsw_xdp_tx_frame(priv, xdpf))
> + drops++;
> + }
> +
> + return n - drops;
> +}
> +
> static const struct net_device_ops cpsw_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_open = cpsw_ndo_open,
> .ndo_stop = cpsw_ndo_stop,
> @@ -2700,6 +3022,8 @@ static const struct net_device_ops cpsw_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid = cpsw_ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid,
> .ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid = cpsw_ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid,
> .ndo_setup_tc = cpsw_ndo_setup_tc,
> + .ndo_bpf = cpsw_ndo_bpf,
> + .ndo_xdp_xmit = cpsw_ndo_xdp_xmit,
> };
>
> static int cpsw_get_regs_len(struct net_device *ndev)
> @@ -2920,6 +3244,57 @@ static int cpsw_check_ch_settings(struct cpsw_common *cpsw,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void cpsw_xdp_rxq_unreg(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int ch)
> +{
> + struct cpsw_slave *slave;
> + struct cpsw_priv *priv;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = cpsw->data.slaves, slave = cpsw->slaves; i; i--, slave++) {
> + if (!slave->ndev)
> + continue;
> +
> + priv = netdev_priv(slave->ndev);
> + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&priv->xdp_rxq[ch]);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_xdp_rxq_reg(struct cpsw_common *cpsw, int ch)
> +{
> + struct cpsw_slave *slave;
> + struct cpsw_priv *priv;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + /* As channels are common for both ports sharing same queues, xdp_rxq
> + * information also becomes shared and used by every packet on this
> + * channel. But exch xdp_rxq holds link on netdev, which by the theory
> + * can have different memory model and so, network device must hold it's
> + * own set of rxq and thus both netdevs should be prepared
> + */
> + for (i = cpsw->data.slaves, slave = cpsw->slaves; i; i--, slave++) {
> + if (!slave->ndev)
> + continue;
> +
> + priv = netdev_priv(slave->ndev);
> +
> + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&priv->xdp_rxq[ch], priv->ndev, ch);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&priv->xdp_rxq[ch],
> + MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL,
> + cpsw->rx_page_pool);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +err:
> + cpsw_xdp_rxq_unreg(cpsw, ch);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int cpsw_update_channels_res(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch_num, int rx)
> {
> struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
> @@ -2950,6 +3325,11 @@ static int cpsw_update_channels_res(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch_num, int rx)
> if (!vec[*ch].ch)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (rx && cpsw_xdp_rxq_reg(cpsw, *ch)) {
> + cpdma_chan_destroy(vec[*ch].ch);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> cpsw_info(priv, ifup, "created new %d %s channel\n", *ch,
> (rx ? "rx" : "tx"));
> (*ch)++;
> @@ -2958,6 +3338,9 @@ static int cpsw_update_channels_res(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch_num, int rx)
> while (*ch > ch_num) {
> (*ch)--;
>
> + if (rx)
> + cpsw_xdp_rxq_unreg(cpsw, *ch);
> +
> ret = cpdma_chan_destroy(vec[*ch].ch);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -3446,6 +3829,15 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dual_emac(struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> ndev->netdev_ops = &cpsw_netdev_ops;
> ndev->ethtool_ops = &cpsw_ethtool_ops;
>
> + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&priv_sl2->xdp_rxq[0], ndev, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&priv_sl2->xdp_rxq[0],
> + MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> /* register the network device */
> SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, cpsw->dev);
> ret = register_netdev(ndev);
> @@ -3517,6 +3909,12 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto clean_ndev_ret;
> }
>
> + cpsw->rx_page_pool = cpsw_create_rx_pool(cpsw);
> + if (IS_ERR(cpsw->rx_page_pool)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "create rx page pool\n");
> + goto clean_ndev_ret;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * This may be required here for child devices.
> */
> @@ -3663,20 +4061,31 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> cpsw->quirk_irq = 1;
>
> ch = cpsw->quirk_irq ? 0 : 7;
> - cpsw->txv[0].ch = cpdma_chan_create(cpsw->dma, ch, cpsw_tx_handler, 0);
> + cpsw->txv[0].ch =
> + cpdma_chan_create(cpsw->dma, ch, cpsw_tx_handler, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(cpsw->txv[0].ch)) {
> dev_err(priv->dev, "error initializing tx dma channel\n");
> ret = PTR_ERR(cpsw->txv[0].ch);
> goto clean_dma_ret;
> }
>
> - cpsw->rxv[0].ch = cpdma_chan_create(cpsw->dma, 0, cpsw_rx_handler, 1);
> + cpsw->rxv[0].ch =
> + cpdma_chan_create(cpsw->dma, 0, cpsw_rx_handler, 1);
> if (IS_ERR(cpsw->rxv[0].ch)) {
> dev_err(priv->dev, "error initializing rx dma channel\n");
> ret = PTR_ERR(cpsw->rxv[0].ch);
> goto clean_dma_ret;
> }
>
> + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&priv->xdp_rxq[0], ndev, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + goto clean_dma_ret;
> +
> + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&priv->xdp_rxq[0], MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL,
> + cpsw->rx_page_pool);
> + if (ret)
> + goto clean_dma_ret;
> +
> ale_params.dev = &pdev->dev;
> ale_params.ale_ageout = ale_ageout;
> ale_params.ale_entries = data->ale_entries;
I think you need to unreg the mem model somewhere on the failure path,
no?
> @@ -3786,6 +4195,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> clean_runtime_disable_ret:
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + page_pool_destroy(cpsw->rx_page_pool);
> clean_ndev_ret:
> free_netdev(priv->ndev);
> return ret;
> @@ -3809,6 +4219,7 @@ static int cpsw_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> cpts_release(cpsw->cpts);
> cpdma_ctlr_destroy(cpsw->dma);
> + page_pool_destroy(cpsw->rx_page_pool);
> cpsw_remove_dt(pdev);
> pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-17 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-17 17:49 [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-17 17:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: add dma mapped submit Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-17 17:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: return handler status Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-17 17:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-17 22:46 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-04-18 9:40 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-18 17:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-18 18:30 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-18 18:30 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-18 18:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-19 8:31 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-04-19 10:42 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-18 6:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add " Björn Töpel
2019-04-18 9:47 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-04-19 8:24 ` Grygorii Strashko
2019-04-19 8:24 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJpBn1y0odvL97-kP5yzKC+tN=fx178nxigfBfDwXhRhPRvDuQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=aniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.