From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVLaw_ViJECoX8VxtrhCDg7m-fOZ0XmF1+n9Y13oVgd4oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925145255.v3.4.I06cb65401ab5ad63ea30c4788d26633928d80f38@changeid>
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:56 PM Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer instead of kmalloc() to
> make sure the bounce buffer to be allocated within its DMAable range.
I think the introduction of need_bounce can be in its own commit or
at least mentioned here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
There have been a lot of changes since v2 :)
Reviewed-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVLaw_ViJECoX8VxtrhCDg7m-fOZ0XmF1+n9Y13oVgd4oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925145255.v3.4.I06cb65401ab5ad63ea30c4788d26633928d80f38@changeid>
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:56 PM Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer instead of kmalloc() to
> make sure the bounce buffer to be allocated within its DMAable range.
I think the introduction of need_bounce can be in its own commit or
at least mentioned here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
There have been a lot of changes since v2 :)
Reviewed-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVLaw_ViJECoX8VxtrhCDg7m-fOZ0XmF1+n9Y13oVgd4oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925145255.v3.4.I06cb65401ab5ad63ea30c4788d26633928d80f38@changeid>
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:56 PM Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer instead of kmalloc() to
> make sure the bounce buffer to be allocated within its DMAable range.
I think the introduction of need_bounce can be in its own commit or
at least mentioned here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
There have been a lot of changes since v2 :)
Reviewed-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVLaw_ViJECoX8VxtrhCDg7m-fOZ0XmF1+n9Y13oVgd4oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925145255.v3.4.I06cb65401ab5ad63ea30c4788d26633928d80f38@changeid>
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:56 PM Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer instead of kmalloc() to
> make sure the bounce buffer to be allocated within its DMAable range.
I think the introduction of need_bounce can be in its own commit or
at least mentioned here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
There have been a lot of changes since v2 :)
Reviewed-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-25 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-25 6:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: Add mt8192 support Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: spi: add mt8192-nor compatible string Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: fix mishandled logics in checking SPI memory operation Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:36 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:36 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:36 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:36 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: support 7 bytes transfer of generic spi Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 7:47 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 7:47 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 7:47 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 7:47 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 9:24 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:24 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:24 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:24 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 7:53 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 7:53 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 7:53 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 7:53 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 6:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 8:21 ` Chuanhong Guo [this message]
2020-09-25 8:21 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 8:21 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 8:21 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 6:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: support 36bit dma addressing Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 8:26 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 8:26 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 8:26 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 8:26 ` Chuanhong Guo
2020-09-25 9:11 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:11 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:11 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 9:11 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-27 8:30 ` Yingjoe Chen
2020-09-27 8:30 ` Yingjoe Chen
2020-09-27 8:30 ` Yingjoe Chen
2020-09-27 8:30 ` Yingjoe Chen
2020-09-28 2:18 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-28 2:18 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-28 2:18 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-28 2:18 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: Add power management support Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-09-25 6:54 ` Ikjoon Jang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJsYDVLaw_ViJECoX8VxtrhCDg7m-fOZ0XmF1+n9Y13oVgd4oQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gch981213@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ikjn@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.