Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: deller@gmx.de, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 00:20:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATjKzUVR7DbJqb=yAinJ1YZo8tzwiXA79E9-VrDn11wwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbvdbdxOKZ9FUQuC@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:05 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in
> > > too via the modules-next tree. Lemme know!
> >
> > I've queued this onto modules-testing to get winder testing [0]
>
> I've moved it to modules-next as I've found no issues.
>
>   Luis

I believe this patch series is wrong.

I thought we agreed that the alignment must be added to
individual asm code, not to the linker script.

I am surprised that you came back to this.

--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada