From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] binfmt_elf: open code copy_siginfo_to_user to kernelspace buffer
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:15:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3HvbPKTkwfWr6PbZ96koO_NrJP1qgk8H1mgk=qUScGkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414070142.288696-5-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:02 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> Instead of messing with the address limit just open code the trivial
> memcpy + memset logic for the native version, and a call to
> to_compat_siginfo for the compat version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Nice!
> */
> #define user_long_t compat_long_t
> #define user_siginfo_t compat_siginfo_t
> -#define copy_siginfo_to_user copy_siginfo_to_user32
> +#define fill_siginfo_note(note, csigdata, siginfo) \
> +do { \
> + to_compat_siginfo(csigdata, siginfo, compat_siginfo_flags()); \
> + fill_note(note, "CORE", NT_SIGINFO, sizeof(*csigdata), csigdata); \
> +} while (0)
I don't think you are changing the behavior here, but I still wonder if it
is in fact correct for x32: is in_x32_syscall() true here when dumping an
x32 compat elf process, or should this rather be set according to which
binfmt_elf copy is being used?
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] binfmt_elf: open code copy_siginfo_to_user to kernelspace buffer
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:15:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3HvbPKTkwfWr6PbZ96koO_NrJP1qgk8H1mgk=qUScGkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414070142.288696-5-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:02 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> Instead of messing with the address limit just open code the trivial
> memcpy + memset logic for the native version, and a call to
> to_compat_siginfo for the compat version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Nice!
> */
> #define user_long_t compat_long_t
> #define user_siginfo_t compat_siginfo_t
> -#define copy_siginfo_to_user copy_siginfo_to_user32
> +#define fill_siginfo_note(note, csigdata, siginfo) \
> +do { \
> + to_compat_siginfo(csigdata, siginfo, compat_siginfo_flags()); \
> + fill_note(note, "CORE", NT_SIGINFO, sizeof(*csigdata), csigdata); \
> +} while (0)
I don't think you are changing the behavior here, but I still wonder if it
is in fact correct for x32: is in_x32_syscall() true here when dumping an
x32 compat elf process, or should this rather be set according to which
binfmt_elf copy is being used?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 7:01 remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] signal: clean up __copy_siginfo_to_user32 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17 21:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 21:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] signal: Factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32 Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 21:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-18 8:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-18 11:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-18 11:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-19 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 9:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-19 9:54 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-19 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] signal: Remove the set_fs in binfmt_elf.c:fill_siginfo_note Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 21:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-19 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] signal: clean up __copy_siginfo_to_user32 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] signal: replace __copy_siginfo_to_user32 with to_compat_siginfo Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-14 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] binfmt_elf: open code copy_siginfo_to_user to kernelspace buffer Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-04-14 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 8:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 8:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-17 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17 18:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 18:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 20:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-17 20:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 3:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-15 3:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-15 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] binfmt_elf: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_core_dump Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] binfmt_elf_fdpic: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_fdpic_core_dump Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] exec: simplify the copy_strings_kernel calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] exec: open code copy_string_kernel Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 8:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-18 8:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-19 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 9:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-19 9:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-17 22:41 ` remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2 Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 22:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-19 8:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 8:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 11:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-19 11:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a3HvbPKTkwfWr6PbZ96koO_NrJP1qgk8H1mgk=qUScGkQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.