All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Jules Irenge" <jbi.octave@gmail.com>,
	"Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
	"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: avoid compiler warning on empty array
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:21:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3Per2f3noAzgN7brQ3g_4EN-vNLcv40k7_vtH+qZG4wA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3063047.NHY2raB2sq@pc-42>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:42 AM Jerome Pouiller
<Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 April 2020 22:34:56 CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:04 PM Jerome Pouiller
> > <Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 29 April 2020 16:21:09 CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct of_device_id wfx_sdio_of_match[];
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id wfx_sdio_of_match[] = {
> > > > +       { .compatible = "silabs,wfx-sdio" },
> > > > +       { .compatible = "silabs,wf200" },
> > > > +       { },
> > > > +};
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, wfx_sdio_of_match);
> > >
> > > I suggest to keep the '#ifdef CONFIG_OF' around this definition. If
> > > CONFIG_OF is undefined, of_match_ptr() and of_match_node() will be NULL
> > > and it should compile.
> >
> > I would generally always go for fewer #ifdef instead of more when the result
> > is the same. Are you worried about wasting 600 bytes of object code size for
> > the array on systems that need this driver but not CONFIG_OF, or something
> > else?
>
> I am not very concerned about the size of the object. However, I think
> that all the modules should apply the same policy regarding the device
> tables. With a few greps, I found 3954 struct of_device_id. About 500 are
> inside #ifdef and about 1000 use of_match_ptr().
>
> Should we consider that the structs of_device_id have to be defined even
> if CONFIG_OF is not defined? And In this case, should we drop
> of_match_ptr()?
>
> Or in contrary, when kernel is compiled without CONFIG_OF, no modules
> should contains OF entries in its device table?

I think the drivers that use an #ifdef here just do so for historic reasons.
In the linux-2.6 days, this caused build failures, but just leaving them
defined has worked for a long time.

       Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Cc: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Jules Irenge" <jbi.octave@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: avoid compiler warning on empty array
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:21:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3Per2f3noAzgN7brQ3g_4EN-vNLcv40k7_vtH+qZG4wA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3063047.NHY2raB2sq@pc-42>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:42 AM Jerome Pouiller
<Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 April 2020 22:34:56 CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:04 PM Jerome Pouiller
> > <Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 29 April 2020 16:21:09 CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct of_device_id wfx_sdio_of_match[];
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id wfx_sdio_of_match[] = {
> > > > +       { .compatible = "silabs,wfx-sdio" },
> > > > +       { .compatible = "silabs,wf200" },
> > > > +       { },
> > > > +};
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, wfx_sdio_of_match);
> > >
> > > I suggest to keep the '#ifdef CONFIG_OF' around this definition. If
> > > CONFIG_OF is undefined, of_match_ptr() and of_match_node() will be NULL
> > > and it should compile.
> >
> > I would generally always go for fewer #ifdef instead of more when the result
> > is the same. Are you worried about wasting 600 bytes of object code size for
> > the array on systems that need this driver but not CONFIG_OF, or something
> > else?
>
> I am not very concerned about the size of the object. However, I think
> that all the modules should apply the same policy regarding the device
> tables. With a few greps, I found 3954 struct of_device_id. About 500 are
> inside #ifdef and about 1000 use of_match_ptr().
>
> Should we consider that the structs of_device_id have to be defined even
> if CONFIG_OF is not defined? And In this case, should we drop
> of_match_ptr()?
>
> Or in contrary, when kernel is compiled without CONFIG_OF, no modules
> should contains OF entries in its device table?

I think the drivers that use an #ifdef here just do so for historic reasons.
In the linux-2.6 days, this caused build failures, but just leaving them
defined has worked for a long time.

       Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-30 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29 14:21 [PATCH] staging: wfx: avoid compiler warning on empty array Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 16:04 ` Jerome Pouiller
2020-04-29 16:04   ` Jerome Pouiller
2020-04-29 20:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 20:34     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-30  8:42     ` Jerome Pouiller
2020-04-30  8:42       ` Jerome Pouiller
2020-04-30 13:21       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-04-30 13:21         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a3Per2f3noAzgN7brQ3g_4EN-vNLcv40k7_vtH+qZG4wA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jbi.octave@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.