From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YGLkPjSBdgpriC0E@blackbook>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:41 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:02:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is expected to happen for such a configuration,
> > presumably these functions are never calls in that case.
> Yes, the functions you patched would only be called from subsystems or
> there should be no way to obtain a struct cgroup_subsys reference
> anyway (hence it's ok to always branch as if ss==NULL).
>
> I'd prefer a variant that wouldn't compile the affected codepaths when
> there are no subsystems registered, however, I couldn't come up with a
> way how to do it without some preprocessor ugliness.
Would it be possible to enclose most or all of kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
in an #ifdef CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT block? I didn't try that
myself, but this might be a way to guarantee that there cannot
be any callers (it would cause a link error).
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Thanks
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YGLkPjSBdgpriC0E@blackbook>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:41 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:02:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is expected to happen for such a configuration,
> > presumably these functions are never calls in that case.
> Yes, the functions you patched would only be called from subsystems or
> there should be no way to obtain a struct cgroup_subsys reference
> anyway (hence it's ok to always branch as if ss==NULL).
>
> I'd prefer a variant that wouldn't compile the affected codepaths when
> there are no subsystems registered, however, I couldn't come up with a
> way how to do it without some preprocessor ugliness.
Would it be possible to enclose most or all of kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
in an #ifdef CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT block? I didn't try that
myself, but this might be a way to guarantee that there cannot
be any callers (it would cause a link error).
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Thanks
Arnd
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YGLkPjSBdgpriC0E@blackbook>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:41 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:02:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is expected to happen for such a configuration,
> > presumably these functions are never calls in that case.
> Yes, the functions you patched would only be called from subsystems or
> there should be no way to obtain a struct cgroup_subsys reference
> anyway (hence it's ok to always branch as if ss==NULL).
>
> I'd prefer a variant that wouldn't compile the affected codepaths when
> there are no subsystems registered, however, I couldn't come up with a
> way how to do it without some preprocessor ugliness.
Would it be possible to enclose most or all of kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
in an #ifdef CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT block? I didn't try that
myself, but this might be a way to guarantee that there cannot
be any callers (it would cause a link error).
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Thanks
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun@intel.com>, Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>,
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YGLkPjSBdgpriC0E@blackbook>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:41 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:02:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is expected to happen for such a configuration,
> > presumably these functions are never calls in that case.
> Yes, the functions you patched would only be called from subsystems or
> there should be no way to obtain a struct cgroup_subsys reference
> anyway (hence it's ok to always branch as if ss==NULL).
>
> I'd prefer a variant that wouldn't compile the affected codepaths when
> there are no subsystems registered, however, I couldn't come up with a
> way how to do it without some preprocessor ugliness.
Would it be possible to enclose most or all of kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
in an #ifdef CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT block? I didn't try that
myself, but this might be a way to guarantee that there cannot
be any callers (it would cause a link error).
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Thanks
Arnd
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun@intel.com>, Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>,
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YGLkPjSBdgpriC0E@blackbook>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:41 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:02:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is expected to happen for such a configuration,
> > presumably these functions are never calls in that case.
> Yes, the functions you patched would only be called from subsystems or
> there should be no way to obtain a struct cgroup_subsys reference
> anyway (hence it's ok to always branch as if ss==NULL).
>
> I'd prefer a variant that wouldn't compile the affected codepaths when
> there are no subsystems registered, however, I couldn't come up with a
> way how to do it without some preprocessor ugliness.
Would it be possible to enclose most or all of kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
in an #ifdef CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT block? I didn't try that
myself, but this might be a way to guarantee that there cannot
be any callers (it would cause a link error).
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Thanks
Arnd
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Martin Sebor <msebor-/MQLu3FmUzdAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers
<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Simon Kelley
<simon-xn1N/tgparsycpQjotevgVpr/1R2p/CL@public.gmane.org>,
James Smart <james.smart-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley"
<jejb-tEXmvtCZX7AybS5Ee8rs3A@public.gmane.org>,
Anders Larsen <al-V9/YLgxv/GvR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Linux ARM
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
tboot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Intel Graphics
<intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
dri-devel
<dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
a
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YGLkPjSBdgpriC0E@blackbook>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:41 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:02:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is expected to happen for such a configuration,
> > presumably these functions are never calls in that case.
> Yes, the functions you patched would only be called from subsystems or
> there should be no way to obtain a struct cgroup_subsys reference
> anyway (hence it's ok to always branch as if ss==NULL).
>
> I'd prefer a variant that wouldn't compile the affected codepaths when
> there are no subsystems registered, however, I couldn't come up with a
> way how to do it without some preprocessor ugliness.
Would it be possible to enclose most or all of kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
in an #ifdef CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT block? I didn't try that
myself, but this might be a way to guarantee that there cannot
be any callers (it would cause a link error).
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
Thanks
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 197+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 16:02 [PATCH 00/11] treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86: compressed: avoid gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 23:30 ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed: Avoid " tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: tboot: avoid Wstringop-overread-warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 20:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 22:07 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-22 22:07 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-22 22:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Sebor
2021-03-22 22:07 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-22 22:07 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-22 22:07 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-22 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 22:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 23:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 23:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 23:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 23:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 23:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-24 9:11 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 9:11 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 9:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2021-03-24 9:11 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 9:11 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 9:11 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 10:39 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 10:39 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 10:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2021-03-24 10:39 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 10:39 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 10:39 ` David Laight
2021-03-22 23:30 ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/tboot: Avoid Wstringop-overread-warning tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/11] security: commoncap: fix -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:31 ` Christian Brauner
2021-03-22 16:31 ` Christian Brauner
2021-03-22 16:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Brauner
2021-03-22 16:31 ` Christian Brauner
2021-03-22 16:31 ` Christian Brauner
2021-03-22 16:31 ` Christian Brauner
2021-03-24 20:50 ` James Morris
2021-03-24 20:50 ` James Morris
2021-03-24 20:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2021-03-24 20:50 ` James Morris
2021-03-24 20:50 ` James Morris
2021-03-24 20:50 ` James Morris
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/11] ath11: Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-28 9:04 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 9:04 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 9:04 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 9:04 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 9:04 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 9:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kalle Valo
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/11] qnx: avoid -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30 8:41 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 8:41 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 8:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 8:41 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 8:41 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 8:41 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 9:00 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-03-30 9:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30 9:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30 9:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30 9:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30 9:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30 14:44 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 14:44 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 14:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 14:44 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 14:44 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30 14:44 ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: sharpsl_param: work around -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/11] atmel: avoid gcc -Wstringop-overflow warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/11] scsi: lpfc: fix gcc -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: avoid stringop-overread warning on pri_latency Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-24 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-24 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-24 15:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-03-24 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-24 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-24 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-24 17:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 11/11] [RFC] drm/i915/dp: fix array overflow warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 8:05 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 8:05 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 8:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 8:05 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 8:05 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 8:05 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 9:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 9:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 9:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 9:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 9:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 9:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 14:49 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-25 14:49 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-25 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Sebor
2021-03-25 14:49 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-25 14:49 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-25 14:49 ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-30 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-30 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-30 10:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2021-03-30 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-30 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-30 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-22 19:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings Patchwork
2021-03-22 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-22 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-03-23 15:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings (rev2) Patchwork
2021-03-25 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings (rev3) Patchwork
2021-03-30 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings (rev4) Patchwork
2021-04-06 4:53 ` [PATCH 00/11] treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings Martin K. Petersen
2021-04-06 4:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin K. Petersen
2021-04-06 4:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-04-06 4:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-04-06 4:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a3nUCGwPpE+E820DniY8Haz1Xx72pA38P6s5MWsbi0iAQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=al@alarsen.net \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=msebor@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
--cc=odin@uged.al \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=simon@thekelleys.org.uk \
--cc=tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=unixbhaskar@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.