From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, spear-devel@list.st.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:13:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKohpom2h4ZrO_vFVUDOA_KfDmA-PpG1aPDMnufbM9kcUhc_OA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355301621.31620.66.camel@smile>
On 12 December 2012 14:10, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Will we survive if the patch is in mainline? I mean how big the impact
> of it is?
It doesn't fail to do fulfill its purpose and even ALL DT stuff would work well.
Its just the matter of using the right API's, design and bindings :)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
spear-devel-nkJGhpqTU55BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:13:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKohpom2h4ZrO_vFVUDOA_KfDmA-PpG1aPDMnufbM9kcUhc_OA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355301621.31620.66.camel@smile>
On 12 December 2012 14:10, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Will we survive if the patch is in mainline? I mean how big the impact
> of it is?
It doesn't fail to do fulfill its purpose and even ALL DT stuff would work well.
Its just the matter of using the right API's, design and bindings :)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:13:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKohpom2h4ZrO_vFVUDOA_KfDmA-PpG1aPDMnufbM9kcUhc_OA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355301621.31620.66.camel@smile>
On 12 December 2012 14:10, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Will we survive if the patch is in mainline? I mean how big the impact
> of it is?
It doesn't fail to do fulfill its purpose and even ALL DT stuff would work well.
Its just the matter of using the right API's, design and bindings :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-12 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 4:19 [PATCH V3 1/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Update documentation style comments for dw_dma_platform_data Viresh Kumar
2012-10-16 4:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-16 4:19 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support Viresh Kumar
2012-10-16 4:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-26 8:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-26 8:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-26 8:48 ` Vinod Koul
2012-10-26 8:48 ` Vinod Koul
2012-10-26 9:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-26 9:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-26 9:10 ` Vinod Koul
2012-10-26 9:10 ` Vinod Koul
2012-12-10 22:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-10 22:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-10 22:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-10 22:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-12 3:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-12 3:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-12 8:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2012-12-12 8:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2012-12-12 8:43 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2012-12-12 8:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-12 8:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-08 23:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-08 23:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-12 8:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2012-12-12 8:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2012-10-16 4:19 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] ARM: SPEAr13xx: Pass DW DMAC platform data from DT Viresh Kumar
2012-10-16 4:19 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKohpom2h4ZrO_vFVUDOA_KfDmA-PpG1aPDMnufbM9kcUhc_OA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spear-devel@list.st.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.