All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
	"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] MODSIGN: Allow the "db" UEFI variable to be suppressed
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:18:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu96ihE7pHrCCeCpy78man-r821b3Vs4Tn_RsYyzY4HV2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <147931990959.16460.3038875071067540418.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On 16 November 2016 at 18:11, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
>
> If a user tells shim to not use the certs/hashes in the UEFI db variable
> for verification purposes, shim will set a UEFI variable called
> MokIgnoreDB.  Have the uefi import code look for this and ignore the db
> variable if it is found.
>

Similar concern as in the previous patch: it appears to me that you
can DoS a machine by setting MokIgnoreDB if, e.g., its modules are
signed against a cert that resides in db, and shim/mokmanager are not
being used.


> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> ---
>
>  certs/load_uefi.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/certs/load_uefi.c b/certs/load_uefi.c
> index b44e464c3ff4..3d8845986019 100644
> --- a/certs/load_uefi.c
> +++ b/certs/load_uefi.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,26 @@ static __initdata efi_guid_t efi_cert_x509_sha256_guid = EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GU
>  static __initdata efi_guid_t efi_cert_sha256_guid = EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID;
>
>  /*
> + * Look to see if a UEFI variable called MokIgnoreDB exists and return true if
> + * it does.
> + *
> + * This UEFI variable is set by the shim if a user tells the shim to not use
> + * the certs/hashes in the UEFI db variable for verification purposes.  If it
> + * is set, we should ignore the db variable also and the true return indicates
> + * this.
> + */
> +static __init bool uefi_check_ignore_db(void)
> +{
> +       efi_status_t status;
> +       unsigned int db = 0;
> +       unsigned long size = sizeof(db);
> +       efi_guid_t guid = EFI_SHIM_LOCK_GUID;
> +
> +       status = efi.get_variable(L"MokIgnoreDB", &guid, NULL, &size, &db);
> +       return status == EFI_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Get a certificate list blob from the named EFI variable.
>   */
>  static __init void *get_cert_list(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t *guid,
> @@ -113,7 +133,9 @@ static __init efi_element_handler_t get_handler_for_dbx(const efi_guid_t *sig_ty
>  }
>
>  /*
> - * Load the certs contained in the UEFI databases
> + * Load the certs contained in the UEFI databases into the secondary trusted
> + * keyring and the UEFI blacklisted X.509 cert SHA256 hashes into the blacklist
> + * keyring.
>   */
>  static int __init load_uefi_certs(void)
>  {
> @@ -129,15 +151,17 @@ static int __init load_uefi_certs(void)
>         /* Get db, MokListRT, and dbx.  They might not exist, so it isn't
>          * an error if we can't get them.
>          */
> -       db = get_cert_list(L"db", &secure_var, &dbsize);
> -       if (!db) {
> -               pr_err("MODSIGN: Couldn't get UEFI db list\n");
> -       } else {
> -               rc = parse_efi_signature_list("UEFI:db",
> -                                             db, dbsize, get_handler_for_db);
> -               if (rc)
> -                       pr_err("Couldn't parse db signatures: %d\n", rc);
> -               kfree(db);
> +       if (!uefi_check_ignore_db()) {
> +               db = get_cert_list(L"db", &secure_var, &dbsize);
> +               if (!db) {
> +                       pr_err("MODSIGN: Couldn't get UEFI db list\n");
> +               } else {
> +                       rc = parse_efi_signature_list("UEFI:db",
> +                                                     db, dbsize, get_handler_for_db);
> +                       if (rc)
> +                               pr_err("Couldn't parse db signatures: %d\n", rc);
> +                       kfree(db);
> +               }
>         }
>
>         mok = get_cert_list(L"MokListRT", &mok_var, &moksize);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: keyrings-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Matthew Garrett
	<matthew.garrett-05XSO3Yj/JvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-security-module
	<linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Josh Boyer
	<jwboyer-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] MODSIGN: Allow the "db" UEFI variable to be suppressed
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:18:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu96ihE7pHrCCeCpy78man-r821b3Vs4Tn_RsYyzY4HV2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <147931990959.16460.3038875071067540418.stgit-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>

On 16 November 2016 at 18:11, David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
>
> If a user tells shim to not use the certs/hashes in the UEFI db variable
> for verification purposes, shim will set a UEFI variable called
> MokIgnoreDB.  Have the uefi import code look for this and ignore the db
> variable if it is found.
>

Similar concern as in the previous patch: it appears to me that you
can DoS a machine by setting MokIgnoreDB if, e.g., its modules are
signed against a cert that resides in db, and shim/mokmanager are not
being used.


> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>
>  certs/load_uefi.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/certs/load_uefi.c b/certs/load_uefi.c
> index b44e464c3ff4..3d8845986019 100644
> --- a/certs/load_uefi.c
> +++ b/certs/load_uefi.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,26 @@ static __initdata efi_guid_t efi_cert_x509_sha256_guid = EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GU
>  static __initdata efi_guid_t efi_cert_sha256_guid = EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID;
>
>  /*
> + * Look to see if a UEFI variable called MokIgnoreDB exists and return true if
> + * it does.
> + *
> + * This UEFI variable is set by the shim if a user tells the shim to not use
> + * the certs/hashes in the UEFI db variable for verification purposes.  If it
> + * is set, we should ignore the db variable also and the true return indicates
> + * this.
> + */
> +static __init bool uefi_check_ignore_db(void)
> +{
> +       efi_status_t status;
> +       unsigned int db = 0;
> +       unsigned long size = sizeof(db);
> +       efi_guid_t guid = EFI_SHIM_LOCK_GUID;
> +
> +       status = efi.get_variable(L"MokIgnoreDB", &guid, NULL, &size, &db);
> +       return status == EFI_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Get a certificate list blob from the named EFI variable.
>   */
>  static __init void *get_cert_list(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t *guid,
> @@ -113,7 +133,9 @@ static __init efi_element_handler_t get_handler_for_dbx(const efi_guid_t *sig_ty
>  }
>
>  /*
> - * Load the certs contained in the UEFI databases
> + * Load the certs contained in the UEFI databases into the secondary trusted
> + * keyring and the UEFI blacklisted X.509 cert SHA256 hashes into the blacklist
> + * keyring.
>   */
>  static int __init load_uefi_certs(void)
>  {
> @@ -129,15 +151,17 @@ static int __init load_uefi_certs(void)
>         /* Get db, MokListRT, and dbx.  They might not exist, so it isn't
>          * an error if we can't get them.
>          */
> -       db = get_cert_list(L"db", &secure_var, &dbsize);
> -       if (!db) {
> -               pr_err("MODSIGN: Couldn't get UEFI db list\n");
> -       } else {
> -               rc = parse_efi_signature_list("UEFI:db",
> -                                             db, dbsize, get_handler_for_db);
> -               if (rc)
> -                       pr_err("Couldn't parse db signatures: %d\n", rc);
> -               kfree(db);
> +       if (!uefi_check_ignore_db()) {
> +               db = get_cert_list(L"db", &secure_var, &dbsize);
> +               if (!db) {
> +                       pr_err("MODSIGN: Couldn't get UEFI db list\n");
> +               } else {
> +                       rc = parse_efi_signature_list("UEFI:db",
> +                                                     db, dbsize, get_handler_for_db);
> +                       if (rc)
> +                               pr_err("Couldn't parse db signatures: %d\n", rc);
> +                       kfree(db);
> +               }
>         }
>
>         mok = get_cert_list(L"MokListRT", &mok_var, &moksize);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-21 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16 18:10 [PATCH 0/9] KEYS: Blacklisting & UEFI database load David Howells
2016-11-16 18:10 ` David Howells
2016-11-16 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] KEYS: Add a system blacklist keyring David Howells
2016-11-16 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/9] X.509: Allow X.509 certs to be blacklisted David Howells
2016-11-16 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/9] PKCS#7: Handle blacklisted certificates David Howells
2016-11-16 18:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] KEYS: Allow unrestricted boot-time addition of keys to secondary keyring David Howells
2016-11-17  6:41   ` Petko Manolov
2016-11-17  9:56   ` David Howells
2016-11-17 10:22     ` Petko Manolov
2016-11-17 10:22       ` Petko Manolov
2016-11-17 11:18     ` David Howells
2016-11-17 11:18       ` David Howells
2016-11-21 14:04     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-11-21 14:04       ` Mimi Zohar
2016-11-21 15:17     ` David Howells
2016-11-21 16:24       ` Mimi Zohar
2016-11-16 18:11 ` [PATCH 5/9] efi: Add SHIM and image security database GUID definitions David Howells
2016-11-21 16:07   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-16 18:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] efi: Add EFI signature data types David Howells
2016-11-16 23:43   ` Mat Martineau
2016-11-17  9:44   ` David Howells
2016-11-17  9:44     ` David Howells
2016-11-21 16:08     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-21 16:08       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-16 18:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] efi: Add an EFI signature blob parser David Howells
2016-11-16 18:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] MODSIGN: Import certificates from UEFI Secure Boot David Howells
2016-11-21 16:16   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-21 16:25     ` Josh Boyer
2016-11-21 16:25       ` Josh Boyer
2016-11-24 19:22       ` James Bottomley
2016-11-24 19:22         ` James Bottomley
2016-11-24 19:17     ` James Bottomley
2016-11-24 19:17       ` James Bottomley
2016-12-02 18:57       ` James Bottomley
2016-12-02 20:18         ` Mimi Zohar
2016-11-16 18:11 ` [PATCH 9/9] MODSIGN: Allow the "db" UEFI variable to be suppressed David Howells
2016-11-21 16:18   ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2016-11-21 16:18     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-21 16:26     ` Josh Boyer
2016-11-21 16:26       ` Josh Boyer
2016-11-21 16:42       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-21 16:42         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-21 19:05         ` Peter Jones
2016-11-21 19:05           ` Peter Jones
2016-11-21 19:06           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-21 19:18             ` Peter Jones
2016-11-21 19:33               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-06 14:05 ` [PATCH 0/9] KEYS: Blacklisting & UEFI database load Jiri Slaby
2018-03-06 14:05   ` Jiri Slaby
2018-03-06 14:05   ` Jiri Slaby
2018-03-07 13:18   ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-07 13:18     ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-07 13:18     ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-07 15:28     ` James Bottomley
2018-03-07 15:28       ` James Bottomley
2018-03-07 15:28       ` James Bottomley
2018-03-11  3:20       ` joeyli
2018-03-11  3:20         ` joeyli
2018-03-11  3:20         ` joeyli
2018-03-19 14:12         ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-19 14:12           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-19 14:12           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-27 11:08           ` joeyli
2018-03-27 11:08             ` joeyli
2018-03-27 11:08             ` joeyli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu96ihE7pHrCCeCpy78man-r821b3Vs4Tn_RsYyzY4HV2Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.