All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: Chris Chilvers <chilversc@gmail.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Benjamin Maynard <benmaynard@google.com>,
	Daire Byrne <daire.byrne@gmail.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] [PATCH v11 0/5] Convert NFS with fscache to the netfs API
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:58:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALF+zOmbPOskW_tQgZd8cz-PsSf4W+=+kaW9VQDHiNHc=5d39w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAmbk-d-kF=-vMD-e2yUnLqsrjtiU0c8oW2ddx0m27CDM2RHXQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 1:32 PM Chris Chilvers <chilversc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We've been using NFS with FS-Cache to act as a caching proxy (re-export). When
> under load we've encountered an issue where all the nfsd processes seem to get
> stuck in I/O wait.
>
> The proxy is running an older version of the nfs-fscache-nfsfs branch taken
> from 17th Nov 2022,
> https://github.com/DaveWysochanskiRH/kernel/commit/52acbd4584d1b83c844371e48de1a1e39d255a6d.
>
> The proxy mounts the source NFS server using NFS v3 with FS-Cache enabled.
> The clients mount the proxy using NFS v4.2 to avoid issues with file handle
> sizes.
>
> dmesg suggests that most of the CPU tasks are blocked by nfsd on
> folio_wait_bit_common
>
>     INFO: task nfsd:180059 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>           Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5+ #1
>     "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>     task:nfsd            state:D stack:0     pid:180059 ppid:2
> flags:0x00004000
>     Call Trace:
>      <TASK>
>      __schedule+0x31e/0x14a0
>      ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x27/0x50
>      schedule+0x6b/0x110
>      io_schedule+0x46/0x80
>      folio_wait_bit_common+0x124/0x340
>      ? xas_find+0x7c/0x1e0
>      ? xas_find_marked+0x1f7/0x370
>      ? filemap_invalidate_unlock_two+0x50/0x50
>      folio_wait_private_2+0x2c/0x50
>      nfs_release_folio+0x5e/0xb0 [nfs]
>      filemap_release_folio+0x66/0x80
>      invalidate_inode_pages2_range+0x240/0x400
>      invalidate_inode_pages2+0x17/0x20
>      nfs_clear_invalid_mapping+0x1d8/0x2d0 [nfs]
>      nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x55/0x70 [nfs]
>      nfs_file_read+0x4c/0xc0 [nfs]
>      generic_file_splice_read+0x8f/0x160
>      do_splice_to+0x7d/0xc0
>      splice_direct_to_actor+0xad/0x210
>      ? fsid_source+0x60/0x60 [nfsd]
>      ? nfsd_file_do_acquire+0xacf/0xbd0 [nfsd]
>      nfsd_splice_read+0x7c/0x120 [nfsd]
>      nfsd_read+0x147/0x1b0 [nfsd]
>      nfsd3_proc_read+0x1b5/0x2d0 [nfsd]
>      ? svcxdr_decode_nfs_fh3+0x4e/0x130 [nfsd]
>      nfsd_dispatch+0x173/0x2b0 [nfsd]
>      svc_process_common+0x3c8/0x620 [sunrpc]
>      ? nfsd_svc+0x3e0/0x3e0 [nfsd]
>      ? nfsd_shutdown_threads+0xb0/0xb0 [nfsd]
>      svc_process+0xb2/0x100 [sunrpc]
>      nfsd+0xda/0x190 [nfsd]
>      kthread+0xfa/0x130
>      ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
>      ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>      </TASK>
>
> Checking /proc/PID/stack for all the nfsd processes had the following counts:
>
> * 72 - nfsd_file_do_acquire+0x20b/0xbd0
> * 36 - folio_wait_bit_common+0x124/0x340
> * 10 - fscache_begin_operation.part.0+0x288/0x2b0 [fscache]
> *  8 - __fscache_use_cookie+0x2e5/0x320 [fscache]
> *  2 - ext4_llseek+0x91/0x110
>
> dmesg also contains a lot of errors about timeouts waiting for the cookie state
> to change:
>
>     FS-Cache: fscache_begin_operation: cookie state change wait timed
> out: cookie->state=1 state=1
>     FS-Cache: O-cookie c=0026b915 [fl=602c na=1 nA=2 s=L]
>     FS-Cache: O-cookie V=00000001
> [Infs,3.0,2,,8335540a,6465ebb4,,,d0,100000,100000,249f0,249f0,249f0,249f0,1]
>     FS-Cache: O-key=[32]
> 'b4eb6564010000005509a81a02000000ffffffff000000000400fd0301000000'
>     FS-Cache: fscache_begin_operation: cookie state change wait timed
> out: cookie->state=1 state=1
>     FS-Cache: O-cookie c=0024fd88 [fl=602c na=1 nA=2 s=L]
>     FS-Cache: O-cookie V=00000001
> [Infs,3.0,2,,8335540a,6465ebb4,,,d0,100000,100000,249f0,249f0,249f0,249f0,1]
>     FS-Cache: O-key=[32]
> 'b4eb6564010000007df7aa1702000000ffffffff000000000400fd0301000000'
>     FS-Cache: fscache_begin_operation: cookie state change wait timed
> out: cookie->state=1 state=1
>     FS-Cache: O-cookie c=0026d61a [fl=4024 na=1 nA=2 s=L]
>     FS-Cache: O-cookie V=00000001
> [Infs,3.0,2,,8335540a,6465ebb4,,,d0,100000,100000,249f0,249f0,249f0,249f0,1]
>     FS-Cache: O-key=[32]
> 'b4eb656401000000b79947ce01000000ffffffff000000000400fd0301000000'
>
> The clients were shutdown but the proxy instance kept for further diagnosis.
> The nfsd sockets remained stuck in CLOSE_WAIT, and the nfsd processes remained
> stuck on various tasks for at least 4 days. It seems at some point over the
> weekend the issue resolved itself and now all the nfsd threads are idle.
>
Let me think about this a bit more, though at first glance it does not
ring a bell.

> I'm going to try to see if I can reproduce this on the latest versions of the
> patches with the lockdep enabled. Though currently we've only seen this issue
> while the system is under a heavy production workload (rendering) after several
> days.
>

May I suggest using anna's linux-next branch for further testing?
The v11 NFS netfs patches are in there, along with other patches for the
next merge window.
git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/anna/linux-nfs.git

$ git log --oneline remotes/nfs-client-anna/linux-next | head --lines=20
e025f0a73f6a NFS: Cleanup unused rpc_clnt variable
c5733ae6dc89 NFS: set varaiable nfs_netfs_debug_id
storage-class-specifier to static
691d0b782066 SUNRPC: remove the maximum number of retries in call_bind_status
ec108d3cc766 NFS: Convert readdir page array functions to use a folio
61f02e0ab81e NFS: Convert the readdir array-of-pages into an array-of-folios
3db63daabe21 NFSv3: handle out-of-order write replies.
03f5bd75a4c1 NFS: Remove fscache specific trace points and NFS_INO_FSCACHE bit
0631d5e02a1c NFS: Remove all NFSIOS_FSCACHE counters due to conversion
to netfs API
000dbe0bec05 NFS: Convert buffered read paths to use netfs when
fscache is enabled
88a4d7bdeec9 NFS: Configure support for netfs when NFS fscache is configured
01c3a40084a4 NFS: Rename readpage_async_filler to nfs_read_add_folio
703c6d03f165 sunrpc: simplify one-level sysctl registration for debug_table
32e356be32b6 sunrpc: move sunrpc_table and proc routines above
c946cb69f238 sunrpc: simplify one-level sysctl registration for
xs_tunables_table
17c6d0ce8340 sunrpc: simplify one-level sysctl registration for
xr_tunables_table
39724217447f nfs: simplify two-level sysctl registration for nfs_cb_sysctls
a2183160ca7e nfs: simplify two-level sysctl registration for nfs4_cb_sysctls
c1d889cf99b8 lockd: simplify two-level sysctl registration for nlm_sysctls
40882deb83c2 NFSv4.1: Always send a RECLAIM_COMPLETE after establishing lease
09a9639e56c0 Linux 6.3-rc6


> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 17:50, David Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 8:43 AM Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Trond, this v11 patchset addresses your latest feedback on patch #2,
> > > and I did a little bit of cleanup to patch 3 (see Changes notes below).
> > > I'm not sure of further changes to patch #3 without a more in-depth
> > > review with specifics, if you feel the current approach is unacceptable [1].
> > >
> >
> > Trond and/or Anna,
> >
> > Have you had a chance to review this patchset and do you have further
> > concerns?
> >
> > Note that patch #3 will require a small fixup to apply after v6.3-rc1
> > due to this commit:
> > 8bb7cd842c44 nfs: use bvec_set_page to initialize bvecs
> >
> > There is also still the small open issue of netfs counting read_bytes
> > in its unlock page path, but I view that as a netfs issue.  I'll followup
> > with David Howells on that.
> >
> >
> > > Ben and Daire, if you could test this set and provide you feedback
> > > and a Tested-By: that would be appreciated.  This set addresses
> > > the existing NFS + fscache performance concerns seen by a few
> > > users [5], which is due to utilization use of the deprecated
> > > single-page function, fscache_fallback_read_page().  However,
> > > until "known issue #1" below is also resolved, even with these
> > > patches, performance of NFS+fscache will still be a problem
> > > in some scenarios.
> > >
> > > This patchset converts NFS with fscache buffered read IO paths to
> > > use the netfs API with a non-invasive approach.  The existing NFS pgio
> > > layer does not need extensive changes, and is the best way so far I've
> > > found to address Trond's previous concerns about modifying the IO
> > > path [2] as well as only enabling netfs when fscache is configured
> > > and enabled [3].  I have not attempted performance comparisions to
> > > address Chuck Lever's concern [4] because we are not converting the
> > > non-fscache enabled NFS IO paths to netfs.
> > >
> > > The patchset is based on Trond's latest 'testing' branch which includes
> > > his folio patchset, and is based on 6.2-rc5.  It has been pushed to
> > > github at:
> > > https://github.com/DaveWysochanskiRH/kernel/commits/nfs-fscache-netfs
> > > https://github.com/DaveWysochanskiRH/kernel/commit/6424e4f139652b7552eff26eb5da1f2282d35616
> > >
> > > Changes since v10 [6]
> > > =====================
> > > PATCH6: Dropped
> > > PATCH1: Rename nfs_pageio_add_page to nfs_read_add_folio
> > > PATCH2: Use anonymous union to add struct netfs_inode to nfs_inode (Trond) [7]
> > > PATCH3: Change nfs_netfs_readpage_release() to nfs_netfs_folio_unlock()
> > >
> > > Testing
> > > =======
> > > I did a full round of testing on this because it was rebased on top of
> > > Trond's testing branch which included his folio series.
> > > All of my unit tests pass except the one with the known issue #1 below.
> > > Multiple runs of xfstests generic tests (applicable to NFS) were run with
> > > with various servers, both with and without fscache enabled, and
> > > compared to baseline (Trond's testing branch).  No new failures were
> > > observed with these patches, and in some xfstest instances, this
> > > patchset improves the results (some tests that were failing now pass).
> > > - hammerspace(pNFS flexfiles): NFS4.1, NFS4.2
> > > - NetApp(pNFS filelayout): NFS4.1, NFS4.0, NFS3
> > > - RHEL9: NFS4.2, NFS4.1, NFS4.0, NFS3
> > >
> > > Known issues
> > > ============
> > > 1. Unit test setting rsize < readahead does not properly read from
> > > fscache but re-reads data from the NFS server
> > > * This will be fixed with another dhowells patch [8]:
> > >   "[PATCH v6 2/2] mm, netfs, fscache: Stop read optimisation when folio removed from pagecache"
> > > * Daire Byrne verified the patch fixes his issue as well
> > >
> > > 2. "Cache volume key already in use" after xfstest runs involving multiple mounts
> > > * Simple reproducer requires just two mounts as follows:
> > >  mount -overs=4.1,fsc,nosharecache -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0  nfs-server:/exp1 /mnt1
> > >  mount -overs=4.1,fsc,nosharecache -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0  nfs-server:/exp2 /mnt2
> > > * This should be fixed with dhowells patch [9]:
> > >   "[PATCH v5] vfs, security: Fix automount superblock LSM init problem, preventing NFS sb sharing"
> > >
> > >
> > > References
> > > ==========
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/0676ecb2bb708e6fc29dbbe6b44551d6a0d021dc.camel@kernel.org/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/9cfd5bc3cfc6abc2d3316b0387222e708d67f595.camel@hammerspace.com/
> > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/da9200f1bded9b8b078a7aef227fd6b92eb028fb.camel@hammerspace.com/
> > > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/0A640C47-5F51-47E8-864D-E0E980F8B310@oracle.com/
> > > [5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/CA+QRt4tPqH87NVkoETLjxieGjZ_f7XxRj+xS3NVxcJ+b8AAKQg@mail.gmail.com/
> > > [6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20221103161637.1725471-1-dwysocha@redhat.com/
> > > [7] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/4d60636f62df4f5c200666ed2d1a5f2414c18e1f.camel@kernel.org/
> > > [8] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20230216150701.3654894-1-dhowells@redhat.com/T/#mf3807fa68fb6d495b87dde0d76b5237833a0cc81
> > > [9] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/217595.1662033775@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
> > >
> > > Dave Wysochanski (5):
> > >   NFS: Rename readpage_async_filler to nfs_read_add_folio
> > >   NFS: Configure support for netfs when NFS fscache is configured
> > >   NFS: Convert buffered read paths to use netfs when fscache is enabled
> > >   NFS: Remove all NFSIOS_FSCACHE counters due to conversion to netfs API
> > >   NFS: Remove fscache specific trace points and NFS_INO_FSCACHE bit
> > >
> > >  fs/nfs/Kconfig             |   1 +
> > >  fs/nfs/fscache.c           | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > >  fs/nfs/fscache.h           | 131 ++++++++++++++------
> > >  fs/nfs/inode.c             |   2 +
> > >  fs/nfs/internal.h          |   9 ++
> > >  fs/nfs/iostat.h            |  17 ---
> > >  fs/nfs/nfstrace.h          |  91 --------------
> > >  fs/nfs/pagelist.c          |   4 +
> > >  fs/nfs/read.c              | 105 ++++++++--------
> > >  fs/nfs/super.c             |  11 --
> > >  include/linux/nfs_fs.h     |  25 ++--
> > >  include/linux/nfs_iostat.h |  12 --
> > >  include/linux/nfs_page.h   |   3 +
> > >  include/linux/nfs_xdr.h    |   3 +
> > >  14 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 339 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Linux-cachefs mailing list
> > > Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Linux-cachefs mailing list
> > Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
>


      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-20 13:43 [PATCH v11 0/5] Convert NFS with fscache to the netfs API Dave Wysochanski
2023-02-20 13:43 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] NFS: Rename readpage_async_filler to nfs_read_add_folio Dave Wysochanski
2023-02-20 13:43 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] NFS: Configure support for netfs when NFS fscache is configured Dave Wysochanski
2023-02-20 13:43 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] NFS: Convert buffered read paths to use netfs when fscache is enabled Dave Wysochanski
2023-02-20 13:43 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] NFS: Remove all NFSIOS_FSCACHE counters due to conversion to netfs API Dave Wysochanski
2023-02-20 13:43 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] NFS: Remove fscache specific trace points and NFS_INO_FSCACHE bit Dave Wysochanski
2023-02-22 12:50 ` [PATCH v11 0/5] Convert NFS with fscache to the netfs API Daire Byrne
2023-02-22 15:57   ` David Wysochanski
2023-02-23 15:47     ` Daire Byrne
2023-03-09 23:50       ` David Wysochanski
2023-03-23 17:49 ` [Linux-cachefs] " David Wysochanski
2023-04-25 17:32   ` Chris Chilvers
2023-04-25 17:58     ` David Wysochanski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALF+zOmbPOskW_tQgZd8cz-PsSf4W+=+kaW9VQDHiNHc=5d39w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dwysocha@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=benmaynard@google.com \
    --cc=chilversc@gmail.com \
    --cc=daire.byrne@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.