From: Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:37:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM4voan82jypoHTOo9KwsvA7tPzdYYa3QYNHMo4Q2Yvt_cf7gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53753021.5050801@gmail.com>
Hi Tomasz,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Abhilash,
>
> On 13.05.2014 14:01, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>> Rebased on
>> 1] Kukjin Kim's tree for-next branch (which has Sachin Kamat's SYSRAM
>> patches merged) with Tomasz Figa's samsung clock tree (samsung-next branch)
>> merged.
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/?h=for-next
>> 2] Pankaj Dubey's v4 PMU patchset
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/10/29
>
> I think this patch is not safe to base on yet. I need to find time to
> review the latest version and share my latest view on this with Pankaj,
> as I have a bit different design in mind.
OK, do you think the PMU series might make it this cycle or should I
drop this as a dependency and re-base my patches just on Daniel's
CPUIdle consolidation.
Regards,
Abhilash
>
> In general, I don't like the fact that you end up with using regmap to
> access registers that are used exclusively by PMU driver or for accesses
> happening at late suspend or early resume, where concurrent accesses
> from other drivers simply can't occur.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com (Abhilash Kesavan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:37:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM4voan82jypoHTOo9KwsvA7tPzdYYa3QYNHMo4Q2Yvt_cf7gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53753021.5050801@gmail.com>
Hi Tomasz,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Abhilash,
>
> On 13.05.2014 14:01, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>> Rebased on
>> 1] Kukjin Kim's tree for-next branch (which has Sachin Kamat's SYSRAM
>> patches merged) with Tomasz Figa's samsung clock tree (samsung-next branch)
>> merged.
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/?h=for-next
>> 2] Pankaj Dubey's v4 PMU patchset
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/10/29
>
> I think this patch is not safe to base on yet. I need to find time to
> review the latest version and share my latest view on this with Pankaj,
> as I have a bit different design in mind.
OK, do you think the PMU series might make it this cycle or should I
drop this as a dependency and re-base my patches just on Daniel's
CPUIdle consolidation.
Regards,
Abhilash
>
> In general, I don't like the fact that you end up with using regmap to
> access registers that are used exclusively by PMU driver or for accesses
> happening at late suspend or early resume, where concurrent accesses
> from other drivers simply can't occur.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-13 12:01 [PATCH v4 0/4] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:01 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] arm: exynos5: Add PMU support for 5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:01 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm: exynos: Modify code to check for cortex A9 rather than the SoC Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:02 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm: exynos5: Add Suspend-to-RAM support for 5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:02 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] clk: samsung: exynos5420: Setup clocks before system suspend Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 12:02 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-15 21:18 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-15 21:18 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-19 2:39 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-19 2:39 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-15 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 Tomasz Figa
2014-05-15 21:22 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-16 5:07 ` Abhilash Kesavan [this message]
2014-05-16 5:07 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-17 0:40 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-17 0:40 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM4voan82jypoHTOo9KwsvA7tPzdYYa3QYNHMo4Q2Yvt_cf7gA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=vikas.sajjan@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.