All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/4] kasan: allow an architecture to disable inline instrumentation
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:06:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNPw2_Av0HVSBMP0nj0a2dwqKxMopWwvsyQF1vv5hN0zzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617063956.94061-2-dja@axtens.net>

On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 08:40, Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> wrote:
>
> For annoying architectural reasons, it's very difficult to support inline
> instrumentation on powerpc64.*
>
> Add a Kconfig flag to allow an arch to disable inline. (It's a bit
> annoying to be 'backwards', but I'm not aware of any way to have
> an arch force a symbol to be 'n', rather than 'y'.)
>
> We also disable stack instrumentation in this case as it does things that
> are functionally equivalent to inline instrumentation, namely adding
> code that touches the shadow directly without going through a C helper.
>
> * on ppc64 atm, the shadow lives in virtual memory and isn't accessible in
> real mode. However, before we turn on virtual memory, we parse the device
> tree to determine which platform and MMU we're running under. That calls
> generic DT code, which is instrumented. Inline instrumentation in DT would
> unconditionally attempt to touch the shadow region, which we won't have
> set up yet, and would crash. We can make outline mode wait for the arch to
> be ready, but we can't change what the compiler inserts for inline mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>

Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>


> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.kasan | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kasan b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
> index cffc2ebbf185..cb5e02d09e11 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.kasan
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
> @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_HW_TAGS
>  config HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC
>         bool
>
> +config ARCH_DISABLE_KASAN_INLINE
> +       bool
> +       help
> +         Sometimes an architecture might not be able to support inline
> +         instrumentation but might be able to support outline instrumentation.
> +         This option allows an architecture to prevent inline and stack
> +         instrumentation from being enabled.
> +
> +
>  config CC_HAS_KASAN_GENERIC
>         def_bool $(cc-option, -fsanitize=kernel-address)
>
> @@ -130,6 +139,7 @@ config KASAN_OUTLINE
>
>  config KASAN_INLINE
>         bool "Inline instrumentation"
> +       depends on !ARCH_DISABLE_KASAN_INLINE
>         help
>           Compiler directly inserts code checking shadow memory before
>           memory accesses. This is faster than outline (in some workloads
> @@ -141,6 +151,7 @@ endchoice
>  config KASAN_STACK
>         bool "Enable stack instrumentation (unsafe)" if CC_IS_CLANG && !COMPILE_TEST
>         depends on KASAN_GENERIC || KASAN_SW_TAGS
> +       depends on !ARCH_DISABLE_KASAN_INLINE
>         default y if CC_IS_GCC
>         help
>           The LLVM stack address sanitizer has a know problem that
> @@ -154,6 +165,9 @@ config KASAN_STACK
>           but clang users can still enable it for builds without
>           CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST.  On gcc it is assumed to always be safe
>           to use and enabled by default.
> +         If the architecture disables inline instrumentation, this is
> +         also disabled as it adds inline-style instrumentation that
> +         is run unconditionally.
>
>  config KASAN_SW_TAGS_IDENTIFY
>         bool "Enable memory corruption identification"
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20210617063956.94061-2-dja%40axtens.net.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/4] kasan: allow an architecture to disable inline instrumentation
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:06:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNPw2_Av0HVSBMP0nj0a2dwqKxMopWwvsyQF1vv5hN0zzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617063956.94061-2-dja@axtens.net>

On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 08:40, Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> wrote:
>
> For annoying architectural reasons, it's very difficult to support inline
> instrumentation on powerpc64.*
>
> Add a Kconfig flag to allow an arch to disable inline. (It's a bit
> annoying to be 'backwards', but I'm not aware of any way to have
> an arch force a symbol to be 'n', rather than 'y'.)
>
> We also disable stack instrumentation in this case as it does things that
> are functionally equivalent to inline instrumentation, namely adding
> code that touches the shadow directly without going through a C helper.
>
> * on ppc64 atm, the shadow lives in virtual memory and isn't accessible in
> real mode. However, before we turn on virtual memory, we parse the device
> tree to determine which platform and MMU we're running under. That calls
> generic DT code, which is instrumented. Inline instrumentation in DT would
> unconditionally attempt to touch the shadow region, which we won't have
> set up yet, and would crash. We can make outline mode wait for the arch to
> be ready, but we can't change what the compiler inserts for inline mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>

Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>


> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.kasan | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kasan b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
> index cffc2ebbf185..cb5e02d09e11 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.kasan
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
> @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_HW_TAGS
>  config HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC
>         bool
>
> +config ARCH_DISABLE_KASAN_INLINE
> +       bool
> +       help
> +         Sometimes an architecture might not be able to support inline
> +         instrumentation but might be able to support outline instrumentation.
> +         This option allows an architecture to prevent inline and stack
> +         instrumentation from being enabled.
> +
> +
>  config CC_HAS_KASAN_GENERIC
>         def_bool $(cc-option, -fsanitize=kernel-address)
>
> @@ -130,6 +139,7 @@ config KASAN_OUTLINE
>
>  config KASAN_INLINE
>         bool "Inline instrumentation"
> +       depends on !ARCH_DISABLE_KASAN_INLINE
>         help
>           Compiler directly inserts code checking shadow memory before
>           memory accesses. This is faster than outline (in some workloads
> @@ -141,6 +151,7 @@ endchoice
>  config KASAN_STACK
>         bool "Enable stack instrumentation (unsafe)" if CC_IS_CLANG && !COMPILE_TEST
>         depends on KASAN_GENERIC || KASAN_SW_TAGS
> +       depends on !ARCH_DISABLE_KASAN_INLINE
>         default y if CC_IS_GCC
>         help
>           The LLVM stack address sanitizer has a know problem that
> @@ -154,6 +165,9 @@ config KASAN_STACK
>           but clang users can still enable it for builds without
>           CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST.  On gcc it is assumed to always be safe
>           to use and enabled by default.
> +         If the architecture disables inline instrumentation, this is
> +         also disabled as it adds inline-style instrumentation that
> +         is run unconditionally.
>
>  config KASAN_SW_TAGS_IDENTIFY
>         bool "Enable memory corruption identification"
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20210617063956.94061-2-dja%40axtens.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17  6:39 [PATCH v14 0/4] KASAN core changes for ppc64 radix KASAN Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  6:39 ` Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  6:39 ` [PATCH v14 1/4] kasan: allow an architecture to disable inline instrumentation Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  6:39   ` Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  7:06   ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-06-17  7:06     ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  7:06     ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  6:39 ` [PATCH v14 2/4] kasan: allow architectures to provide an outline readiness check Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  6:39   ` Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  6:55   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-17  6:55     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-17  6:59   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-17  6:59     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-17  7:06   ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  7:06     ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  7:06     ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  6:39 ` [PATCH v14 3/4] mm: define default MAX_PTRS_PER_* in include/pgtable.h Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  6:39   ` Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  7:00   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-17  7:00     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-17  7:08   ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  7:08     ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  7:08     ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  6:39 ` [PATCH v14 4/4] kasan: use MAX_PTRS_PER_* for early shadow tables Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  6:39   ` Daniel Axtens
2021-06-17  7:09   ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  7:09     ` Marco Elver
2021-06-17  7:09     ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANpmjNPw2_Av0HVSBMP0nj0a2dwqKxMopWwvsyQF1vv5hN0zzA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.