All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
To: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: samsung: defer pinctrl_enable
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 21:14:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4nFLeBqNRh7g8a5eJZdT_G6Dtc4zs6nkyTpcG++mYHxfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006125557.212681-2-m.majewski2@samsung.com>

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:01 AM Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> dev_pinctrl_register function immediately enables the pinctrl subsystem,

Nitpick: dev -> devm

> which is unpreferable in general, since drivers might be unable to
> handle calls immediately. Hence devm_pinctrl_register_and_init, which
> does not call pinctrl_enable, is preferred.
>
> In case of our driver using the old function does not seem to be
> problematic for now, but will become an issue when we postpone parts of
> pinctrl initialization in a future commit, and it is a good idea to move
> off a deprecated-ish function anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> index e54847040b4a..e496af72a587 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -904,11 +904,11 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       drvdata->pctl_dev = devm_pinctrl_register(&pdev->dev, ctrldesc,
> -                                                 drvdata);
> -       if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pctl_dev)) {
> +       ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(&pdev->dev, ctrldesc, drvdata,
> +                                            &drvdata->pctl_dev);
> +       if (ret) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register pinctrl driver\n");
> -               return PTR_ERR(drvdata->pctl_dev);
> +               return ret;
>         }
>
>         for (bank = 0; bank < drvdata->nr_banks; ++bank) {
> @@ -1176,6 +1176,10 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (ret)
>                 goto err_unregister;
>
> +       ret = pinctrl_enable(drvdata->pctl_dev);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err_unregister;
> +
>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drvdata);
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.42.0
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
To: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,  linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	 Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: samsung: defer pinctrl_enable
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 21:14:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4nFLeBqNRh7g8a5eJZdT_G6Dtc4zs6nkyTpcG++mYHxfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006125557.212681-2-m.majewski2@samsung.com>

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:01 AM Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> dev_pinctrl_register function immediately enables the pinctrl subsystem,

Nitpick: dev -> devm

> which is unpreferable in general, since drivers might be unable to
> handle calls immediately. Hence devm_pinctrl_register_and_init, which
> does not call pinctrl_enable, is preferred.
>
> In case of our driver using the old function does not seem to be
> problematic for now, but will become an issue when we postpone parts of
> pinctrl initialization in a future commit, and it is a good idea to move
> off a deprecated-ish function anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> index e54847040b4a..e496af72a587 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -904,11 +904,11 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       drvdata->pctl_dev = devm_pinctrl_register(&pdev->dev, ctrldesc,
> -                                                 drvdata);
> -       if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pctl_dev)) {
> +       ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(&pdev->dev, ctrldesc, drvdata,
> +                                            &drvdata->pctl_dev);
> +       if (ret) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register pinctrl driver\n");
> -               return PTR_ERR(drvdata->pctl_dev);
> +               return ret;
>         }
>
>         for (bank = 0; bank < drvdata->nr_banks; ++bank) {
> @@ -1176,6 +1176,10 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (ret)
>                 goto err_unregister;
>
> +       ret = pinctrl_enable(drvdata->pctl_dev);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err_unregister;
> +
>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drvdata);
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.42.0
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-07  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20231006130032eucas1p18c6f5c39614768911730fa6ed0201ee3@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-06 12:55 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix Samsung pinctrl driver static allocation of GPIO base warning Mateusz Majewski
2023-10-06 12:55   ` Mateusz Majewski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20231006130038eucas1p1c849a21714227a11759681ef909ffd94@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-06 12:55     ` [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: samsung: defer pinctrl_enable Mateusz Majewski
2023-10-06 12:55       ` Mateusz Majewski
2023-10-07  2:14       ` Sam Protsenko [this message]
2023-10-07  2:14         ` Sam Protsenko
     [not found]   ` <CGME20231006130041eucas1p1fd945c734c0d35067107e7c699201bdb@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-06 12:55     ` [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: samsung: use add_pin_ranges method to add pinctrl ranges Mateusz Majewski
2023-10-06 12:55       ` Mateusz Majewski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20231006130042eucas1p10679037ebd812183a5edff0b7c1e8b6a@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-06 12:55     ` [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: samsung: choose GPIO numberspace base dynamically Mateusz Majewski
2023-10-06 12:55       ` Mateusz Majewski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20231006130044eucas1p17a141ec5aafca3d5af5295049f8b1651@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-06 12:55     ` [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: samsung: do not offset pinctrl numberspaces Mateusz Majewski
2023-10-06 12:55       ` Mateusz Majewski
2023-10-07  2:14   ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix Samsung pinctrl driver static allocation of GPIO base warning Sam Protsenko
2023-10-07  2:14     ` Sam Protsenko
2023-10-08 13:09     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-08 13:09       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-08 18:45       ` Sam Protsenko
2023-10-08 18:45         ` Sam Protsenko
2023-10-09  9:42         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-09  9:42           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-09  9:52           ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-10-09  9:52             ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-10-09 10:02   ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-10-09 10:02     ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-10-09 10:38   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-09 10:38     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-10 12:09   ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-10 12:09     ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPLW+4nFLeBqNRh7g8a5eJZdT_G6Dtc4zs6nkyTpcG++mYHxfA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.majewski2@samsung.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.