All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] device-dax: Add dis-contiguous resource support
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:48:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gBQOh9sba+Zbpo6yw3sh9JCKC7Cd10qdNc7d1TvTFfYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c673cba2-8749-d63e-f0b2-592ed753481d@oracle.com>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:35 AM Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/24/20 4:12 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> > On 3/23/20 11:55 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>  static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >>              struct dev_dax *dev_dax, resource_size_t size)
> >>  {
> >>      resource_size_t avail = dax_region_avail_size(dax_region), to_alloc;
> >> -    resource_size_t dev_size = range_len(&dev_dax->range);
> >> +    resource_size_t dev_size = dev_dax_size(dev_dax);
> >>      struct resource *region_res = &dax_region->res;
> >>      struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> >> -    const char *name = dev_name(dev);
> >>      struct resource *res, *first;
> >> +    resource_size_t alloc = 0;
> >> +    int rc;
> >>
> >>      if (dev->driver)
> >>              return -EBUSY;
> >> @@ -684,38 +766,47 @@ static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >>       * allocating a new resource.
> >>       */
> >>      first = region_res->child;
> >> -    if (!first)
> >> -            return __alloc_dev_dax_range(dev_dax, dax_region->res.start,
> >> -                            to_alloc);
> >
> > You probably want to retain the condition above?
> >
> > Otherwise it removes the ability to create new devices or resizing it , once we
> > have zero-ed the last one.
> >
>
> A quick unit test that I had stashed here to help explain what I mean:
>
>         cd /sys/bus/dax/devices
>         # dax0.0 is the only dax device in the corresponding dax_region
>         echo dax0.0 > dax0.0/driver/unbind
>         echo 0 > dax0.0/size
>         # Shouldn't fail but returns -ENOSPC despite having
>         # the full region available
>         cat $(readlink -f dax0.0/../dax_region/available_size) > dax0.0/size

Thanks! Will incorporate that test before resending the series.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] device-dax: Add dis-contiguous resource support
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:48:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gBQOh9sba+Zbpo6yw3sh9JCKC7Cd10qdNc7d1TvTFfYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c673cba2-8749-d63e-f0b2-592ed753481d@oracle.com>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:35 AM Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/24/20 4:12 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> > On 3/23/20 11:55 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>  static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >>              struct dev_dax *dev_dax, resource_size_t size)
> >>  {
> >>      resource_size_t avail = dax_region_avail_size(dax_region), to_alloc;
> >> -    resource_size_t dev_size = range_len(&dev_dax->range);
> >> +    resource_size_t dev_size = dev_dax_size(dev_dax);
> >>      struct resource *region_res = &dax_region->res;
> >>      struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> >> -    const char *name = dev_name(dev);
> >>      struct resource *res, *first;
> >> +    resource_size_t alloc = 0;
> >> +    int rc;
> >>
> >>      if (dev->driver)
> >>              return -EBUSY;
> >> @@ -684,38 +766,47 @@ static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >>       * allocating a new resource.
> >>       */
> >>      first = region_res->child;
> >> -    if (!first)
> >> -            return __alloc_dev_dax_range(dev_dax, dax_region->res.start,
> >> -                            to_alloc);
> >
> > You probably want to retain the condition above?
> >
> > Otherwise it removes the ability to create new devices or resizing it , once we
> > have zero-ed the last one.
> >
>
> A quick unit test that I had stashed here to help explain what I mean:
>
>         cd /sys/bus/dax/devices
>         # dax0.0 is the only dax device in the corresponding dax_region
>         echo dax0.0 > dax0.0/driver/unbind
>         echo 0 > dax0.0/size
>         # Shouldn't fail but returns -ENOSPC despite having
>         # the full region available
>         cat $(readlink -f dax0.0/../dax_region/available_size) > dax0.0/size

Thanks! Will incorporate that test before resending the series.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] device-dax: Add dis-contiguous resource support
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:48:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gBQOh9sba+Zbpo6yw3sh9JCKC7Cd10qdNc7d1TvTFfYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c673cba2-8749-d63e-f0b2-592ed753481d@oracle.com>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:35 AM Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/24/20 4:12 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> > On 3/23/20 11:55 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>  static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >>              struct dev_dax *dev_dax, resource_size_t size)
> >>  {
> >>      resource_size_t avail = dax_region_avail_size(dax_region), to_alloc;
> >> -    resource_size_t dev_size = range_len(&dev_dax->range);
> >> +    resource_size_t dev_size = dev_dax_size(dev_dax);
> >>      struct resource *region_res = &dax_region->res;
> >>      struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> >> -    const char *name = dev_name(dev);
> >>      struct resource *res, *first;
> >> +    resource_size_t alloc = 0;
> >> +    int rc;
> >>
> >>      if (dev->driver)
> >>              return -EBUSY;
> >> @@ -684,38 +766,47 @@ static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >>       * allocating a new resource.
> >>       */
> >>      first = region_res->child;
> >> -    if (!first)
> >> -            return __alloc_dev_dax_range(dev_dax, dax_region->res.start,
> >> -                            to_alloc);
> >
> > You probably want to retain the condition above?
> >
> > Otherwise it removes the ability to create new devices or resizing it , once we
> > have zero-ed the last one.
> >
>
> A quick unit test that I had stashed here to help explain what I mean:
>
>         cd /sys/bus/dax/devices
>         # dax0.0 is the only dax device in the corresponding dax_region
>         echo dax0.0 > dax0.0/driver/unbind
>         echo 0 > dax0.0/size
>         # Shouldn't fail but returns -ENOSPC despite having
>         # the full region available
>         cat $(readlink -f dax0.0/../dax_region/available_size) > dax0.0/size

Thanks! Will incorporate that test before resending the series.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-25 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-23 23:54 [PATCH 00/12] device-dax: Support sub-dividing soft-reserved ranges Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 01/12] device-dax: Drop the dax_region.pfn_flags attribute Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 02/12] device-dax: Move instance creation parameters to 'struct dev_dax_data' Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 03/12] device-dax: Make pgmap optional for instance creation Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 04/12] device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 05/12] device-dax: Add an allocation interface for device-dax instances Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 06/12] device-dax: Introduce seed devices Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 07/12] drivers/base: Make device_find_child_by_name() compatible with sysfs inputs Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 08/12] device-dax: Add resize support Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 09/12] mm/memremap_pages: Convert to 'struct range' Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 10/12] mm/memremap_pages: Support multiple ranges per invocation Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 11/12] device-dax: Add dis-contiguous resource support Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-24 16:12   ` Joao Martins
2020-03-24 16:12     ` Joao Martins
2020-03-25 10:35     ` Joao Martins
2020-03-25 10:35       ` Joao Martins
2020-03-25 17:48       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2020-03-25 17:48         ` Dan Williams
2020-03-25 17:48         ` Dan Williams
2020-03-26 17:49         ` Joao Martins
2020-03-26 17:49           ` Joao Martins
2020-07-11  0:44     ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11  0:44       ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11  0:44       ` Dan Williams
2020-04-06 10:43   ` Joao Martins
2020-04-06 10:43     ` Joao Martins
2020-04-06 20:22     ` Dan Williams
2020-04-06 20:22       ` Dan Williams
2020-04-06 20:22       ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11  0:47       ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11  0:47         ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11  0:47         ` Dan Williams
2020-05-12 14:36   ` Joao Martins
2020-05-12 14:36     ` Joao Martins
2020-07-11  0:52     ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11  0:52       ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11  0:52       ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 12/12] device-dax: Introduce 'mapping' devices Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55   ` Dan Williams
2020-03-24 16:27   ` Joao Martins
2020-03-24 16:27     ` Joao Martins
2020-03-24 23:51     ` Dan Williams
2020-03-24 23:51       ` Dan Williams
2020-03-24 23:51       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4gBQOh9sba+Zbpo6yw3sh9JCKC7Cd10qdNc7d1TvTFfYQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.