From: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>, sunil joshi <joshi@samsung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: remove display power domain for exynos5420 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 19:07:40 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAPdUM4MToVJC5KRS1DUDmYEdUx2PGBE0G1v7p-SGgqpw7SPOhw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAPdUM4OK+ATMMRM67dV5JeeTGMu=XA7Gvi7Uif+Hypf3iP+6jg@mail.gmail.com> Hi Andrej, Inki, On 18 June 2014 12:06, Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Andrej, > > On 18 June 2014 11:46, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote: >> On 06/17/2014 07:49 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Please review this patch. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rahul Sharma >>> >>> On 9 June 2014 16:58, Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> wrote: >>>> Display domain is removed due to instability issues. Explaining >>>> the problem below: >>>> >>>> exynos_init_late triggers the pm_genpd_poweroff_unused which >>>> powers off the unused power domains. This call hits before >>>> the trigger to deferred probes. >>>> >>>> DRM DP Panel defers the probe due to supply get failure. By the >>>> time, deferred probe is scheduled again, Display Power Domain is >>>> powered off by pm_genpd_poweroff_unused. >>>> >>>> FIMD and DP drivers are accessing registers during Probe and Bind >>>> callbacks. If display domain is enabled/disabled around register >>>> accesses, display domain gets unstable and we are getting Power >>>> Domain Disable fail notification. Increasing the Timeout also >>>> didn't help. >> >> As I understand the problem is that fimd and dp drivers access hw >> registers without enabling power domain. So the proper solution is to >> fix these drivers. > > That is also a problem but I fixed those accesses in my local kernel before > hitting this issue. If we do register accesses in FIMD/DP probe/bind we > observes "Prefetch abort" exception. But here the problem is that 'DP > domain disable' starts failing if we enable/disable multiple times. > >> >> Btw. there are already patches removing hw access from probe/bind of >> fimd. I guess removing also hw access from dp probe/bind could be a good >> solution. > > Please let me know the links for posted patches. I will test with those patches. Is there any update on this? Please share the patches which fixes the above issue or avoid the above scenario of multiple PM Domain enable/disable. I will test them for exynos5 based boards. Otherwise we should get this change merged else display will remain broken for exynos5 based boards. Regards, Rahul Sharma. > > Regards, > Rahul Sharma > >> >> Regards >> Andrzej >> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> >>>> --- >>>> based on Kukjin's for-next branch. >>>> >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 6 ------ >>>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi >>>> index e385322..3d528cf 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi >>>> @@ -262,11 +262,6 @@ >>>> reg = <0x10044060 0x20>; >>>> }; >>>> >>>> - disp_pd: power-domain@100440C0 { >>>> - compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; >>>> - reg = <0x100440C0 0x20>; >>>> - }; >>>> - >>>> msc_pd: power-domain@10044120 { >>>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; >>>> reg = <0x10044120 0x20>; >>>> @@ -518,7 +513,6 @@ >>>> }; >>>> >>>> fimd: fimd@14400000 { >>>> - samsung,power-domain = <&disp_pd>; >>>> clocks = <&clock CLK_SCLK_FIMD1>, <&clock CLK_FIMD1>; >>>> clock-names = "sclk_fimd", "fimd"; >>>> }; >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.9.5 >>>> >>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rahul.sharma@samsung.com (Rahul Sharma) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: remove display power domain for exynos5420 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 19:07:40 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAPdUM4MToVJC5KRS1DUDmYEdUx2PGBE0G1v7p-SGgqpw7SPOhw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAPdUM4OK+ATMMRM67dV5JeeTGMu=XA7Gvi7Uif+Hypf3iP+6jg@mail.gmail.com> Hi Andrej, Inki, On 18 June 2014 12:06, Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Andrej, > > On 18 June 2014 11:46, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote: >> On 06/17/2014 07:49 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Please review this patch. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rahul Sharma >>> >>> On 9 June 2014 16:58, Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> wrote: >>>> Display domain is removed due to instability issues. Explaining >>>> the problem below: >>>> >>>> exynos_init_late triggers the pm_genpd_poweroff_unused which >>>> powers off the unused power domains. This call hits before >>>> the trigger to deferred probes. >>>> >>>> DRM DP Panel defers the probe due to supply get failure. By the >>>> time, deferred probe is scheduled again, Display Power Domain is >>>> powered off by pm_genpd_poweroff_unused. >>>> >>>> FIMD and DP drivers are accessing registers during Probe and Bind >>>> callbacks. If display domain is enabled/disabled around register >>>> accesses, display domain gets unstable and we are getting Power >>>> Domain Disable fail notification. Increasing the Timeout also >>>> didn't help. >> >> As I understand the problem is that fimd and dp drivers access hw >> registers without enabling power domain. So the proper solution is to >> fix these drivers. > > That is also a problem but I fixed those accesses in my local kernel before > hitting this issue. If we do register accesses in FIMD/DP probe/bind we > observes "Prefetch abort" exception. But here the problem is that 'DP > domain disable' starts failing if we enable/disable multiple times. > >> >> Btw. there are already patches removing hw access from probe/bind of >> fimd. I guess removing also hw access from dp probe/bind could be a good >> solution. > > Please let me know the links for posted patches. I will test with those patches. Is there any update on this? Please share the patches which fixes the above issue or avoid the above scenario of multiple PM Domain enable/disable. I will test them for exynos5 based boards. Otherwise we should get this change merged else display will remain broken for exynos5 based boards. Regards, Rahul Sharma. > > Regards, > Rahul Sharma > >> >> Regards >> Andrzej >> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> >>>> --- >>>> based on Kukjin's for-next branch. >>>> >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 6 ------ >>>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi >>>> index e385322..3d528cf 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi >>>> @@ -262,11 +262,6 @@ >>>> reg = <0x10044060 0x20>; >>>> }; >>>> >>>> - disp_pd: power-domain at 100440C0 { >>>> - compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; >>>> - reg = <0x100440C0 0x20>; >>>> - }; >>>> - >>>> msc_pd: power-domain at 10044120 { >>>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; >>>> reg = <0x10044120 0x20>; >>>> @@ -518,7 +513,6 @@ >>>> }; >>>> >>>> fimd: fimd at 14400000 { >>>> - samsung,power-domain = <&disp_pd>; >>>> clocks = <&clock CLK_SCLK_FIMD1>, <&clock CLK_FIMD1>; >>>> clock-names = "sclk_fimd", "fimd"; >>>> }; >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.9.5 >>>> >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-07 13:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-06-09 11:28 [PATCH] ARM: dts: remove display power domain for exynos5420 Rahul Sharma 2014-06-09 11:28 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-06-17 5:49 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-06-17 5:49 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-06-18 6:16 ` Andrzej Hajda 2014-06-18 6:16 ` Andrzej Hajda 2014-06-18 6:36 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-06-18 6:36 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-07-07 13:37 ` Rahul Sharma [this message] 2014-07-07 13:37 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-07-08 15:34 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-07-08 15:34 ` Tomasz Figa [not found] ` <53BC0F8F.4010106-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> 2014-07-09 11:30 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-07-09 11:30 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-07-14 9:09 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-07-14 9:09 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-07-15 23:35 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-07-15 23:35 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-07-16 2:25 ` Rahul Sharma 2014-07-16 2:25 ` Rahul Sharma
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAPdUM4MToVJC5KRS1DUDmYEdUx2PGBE0G1v7p-SGgqpw7SPOhw@mail.gmail.com \ --to=rahul.sharma@samsung.com \ --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \ --cc=joshi@samsung.com \ --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.