Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/3] driver core: add error handling for devtmpfs_create_node()

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@huawei.com>,
	chenwandun@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, sunnanyong@huawei.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/3] driver core: add error handling for devtmpfs_create_node()
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:59:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+s/SceRUP28YHHY@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+rWwtjVBDHHVzB3@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 05:33:06PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 05:14:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Hi Longlong,
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:54:42AM +0000, Longlong Xia wrote:
> > > In some cases, devtmpfs_create_node() can return error value.
> > > So, make use of it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/base/core.c | 6 +++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> > > index 7dab705f2937..aaa3088e5456 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> > > @@ -3405,7 +3405,9 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev)
> > >  		if (error)
> > >  			goto SysEntryError;
> > >  
> > > -		devtmpfs_create_node(dev);
> > > +		error = devtmpfs_create_node(dev);
> > > +		if (error)
> > > +			goto DevtmpfsError;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	/* Notify clients of device addition.  This call must come
> > > @@ -3461,6 +3463,8 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev)
> > >  done:
> > >  	put_device(dev);
> > >  	return error;
> > > + DevtmpfsError:
> > > +	device_remove_sys_dev_entry(dev);
> > >   SysEntryError:
> > >  	if (MAJOR(dev->devt))
> > >  		device_remove_file(dev, &dev_attr_dev);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > > 
> > 
> > After this change in -next as commit 31b4b6730fd4 ("driver core: add
> > error handling for devtmpfs_create_node()"), my test machines failed to
> > boot after the rootfs could not be mounted. I added some logging to see
> > which device was failing, which triggers a few times with the exact same
> > message:
> > 
> >   device: 'btrfs-control': devtmpfs_create_node() failed, err = -17
> > 
> > with -17 being -EEXIST. I am not sure why this device is getting
> > registered more than once, it appears to occur during module insertion
> > though, as I am able to get to systemd starting within the initrd.
> > 
> > Should this particular return value be downgraded to a warning so that
> > the device still loads or should the driver be fixed? I have cc'd the
> > btrfs mailing list, in case they have any input.
> 
> Apologies, I see now that the second patch in this series is logging for
> this, sorry for not using or noticing that sooner.
> 
> I am now looking at some of my other test machines and I see messages
> similar to the one above for other devices:
> 
> [   16.268685] sound timer: failed to create snd/timer, ret = -17
> [   16.274666] ALSA: unable to register timer device (-17)
> [   16.500253] sound timer: failed to create snd/timer, ret = -17
> [   16.506124] ALSA: unable to register timer device (-17)
> 
> [   18.273067] misc rfkill: failed to create rfkill, ret = -17
> [   18.464836] misc rfkill: failed to create rfkill, ret = -17
> [   19.366149] misc tun: failed to create net/tun, ret = -17
> [   19.371613] tun: Can't register misc device 200
> [   19.552362] misc tun: failed to create net/tun, ret = -17
> [   19.557839] tun: Can't register misc device 200
> [   23.124993] misc tun: failed to create net/tun, ret = -17
> [   23.130460] tun: Can't register misc device 200
> [   23.299267] misc tun: failed to create net/tun, ret = -17
> [   23.299319] tun: Can't register misc device 200
> [   27.050363] misc tun: failed to create net/tun, ret = -17
> [   27.055824] tun: Can't register misc device 200
> [   27.181496] misc tun: failed to create net/tun, ret = -17
> 
> So it seems like this is not a btrfs specific problem?

Ok, let me go revert the series for now.  Longlong, please feel free to
resubmit after testing this a bit better.

thanks,

greg k-h