All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	corbet@lwn.net, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, yuzhe@nfschina.com,
	seanjc@google.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com, ricarkol@google.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, renzhengeek@gmail.com, reijiw@google.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_mmu.h from vgic.h
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:14:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9Ro6IEjPVeQfmUQ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127235150.17025-2-gshan@redhat.com>

On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 07:51:47AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> We need a unified helper in 'kvm/vgic/vgic.h' to write guest memory. In
> the helper, the check of no-running-vcpu context for dirty ring will be
> applied. kvm_write_guest_lock(), defined in 'include/asm/kvm_mmu.h', is
> going to be dereferenced by the unified helper.
> 
> Include 'include/asm/kvm_mmu.h' to 'kvm/vgic/vgic.h' to avoid including
> the former header file when the later one is needed. With the change,
> the duplicate inclusions of 'include/asm/kvm_mmu.h' are removed.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Suggested-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

No, I did not suggest for you to do this. I had suggested you just
include asm/kvm_mmu.h from the vgic header, not to go and remove it from
all the files that include vgic.h.

Who cares if kvm_mmu.h gets included twice? Include guards exist for this
exact reason.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	corbet@lwn.net, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, yuzhe@nfschina.com,
	seanjc@google.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com, ricarkol@google.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, renzhengeek@gmail.com, reijiw@google.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_mmu.h from vgic.h
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:14:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9Ro6IEjPVeQfmUQ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127235150.17025-2-gshan@redhat.com>

On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 07:51:47AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> We need a unified helper in 'kvm/vgic/vgic.h' to write guest memory. In
> the helper, the check of no-running-vcpu context for dirty ring will be
> applied. kvm_write_guest_lock(), defined in 'include/asm/kvm_mmu.h', is
> going to be dereferenced by the unified helper.
> 
> Include 'include/asm/kvm_mmu.h' to 'kvm/vgic/vgic.h' to avoid including
> the former header file when the later one is needed. With the change,
> the duplicate inclusions of 'include/asm/kvm_mmu.h' are removed.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Suggested-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

No, I did not suggest for you to do this. I had suggested you just
include asm/kvm_mmu.h from the vgic header, not to go and remove it from
all the files that include vgic.h.

Who cares if kvm_mmu.h gets included twice? Include guards exist for this
exact reason.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-28  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-27 23:51 [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve dirty ring warning report Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51 ` Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_mmu.h from vgic.h Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51   ` Gavin Shan
2023-01-28  0:14   ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2023-01-28  0:14     ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-28  0:18     ` Gavin Shan
2023-01-28  0:18       ` Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: arm64: Add helper vgic_write_guest_lock() Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51   ` Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] KVM: arm64: Allow no running vcpu on restoring VGICv3 LPI pending status Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51   ` Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: arm64: Allow no running vcpu on saving VGICv3 pending table Gavin Shan
2023-01-27 23:51   ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9Ro6IEjPVeQfmUQ@google.com \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=renzhengeek@gmail.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzhe@nfschina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.