Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add compatible for mt8195 - Greg Kroah-Hartman

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add compatible for mt8195
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:31:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBp7hnyPJwgK598V@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203102642.7353-1-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:26:40PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> There are 4 USB controllers on MT8195, the controllers (IP1~IP3,
> exclude IP0) have a wrong default SOF/ITP interval which is
> calculated from the frame counter clock 24Mhz by default, but
> in fact, the frame counter clock is 48Mhz, so we should set
> the accurate interval according to 48Mhz. Here add a new compatible
> for MT8195, it's also supported in driver. But the first controller
> (IP0) has no such issue, we prefer to use generic compatible,
> e.g. mt8192's compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> ---
> v2: no changes

Note, I do not apply patches with "RFC" as obviously you do not think
they are worthy of being applied.  I don't see what you are asking to be
done with this set of patches, please explain?

thanks,

greg k-h