All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd: Don't call early_amd_iommu_init() when AMD IOMMU is disabled
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:32:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFIE8xnr/HWqxm4p@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <449d4a2d192d23eb504e43b13c35c326f2d0309a.camel@infradead.org>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:47:11AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If you've already moved the Stoney Ridge check out of the way, there's
> no real reason why you can't just set init_state=IOMMU_CMDLINE_DISABLED
> directly from parse_amd_iommu_options(), is there? Then you don't need
> the condition here at all?

True, there is even more room for optimization. The amd_iommu_disabled
variable can go away entirely, including its checks in
early_amd_iommu_init(). I will do a patch-set on-top of this for v5.13
which does more cleanups.

Thanks,

	Joerg

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd: Don't call early_amd_iommu_init() when AMD IOMMU is disabled
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:32:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFIE8xnr/HWqxm4p@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <449d4a2d192d23eb504e43b13c35c326f2d0309a.camel@infradead.org>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:47:11AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If you've already moved the Stoney Ridge check out of the way, there's
> no real reason why you can't just set init_state=IOMMU_CMDLINE_DISABLED
> directly from parse_amd_iommu_options(), is there? Then you don't need
> the condition here at all?

True, there is even more room for optimization. The amd_iommu_disabled
variable can go away entirely, including its checks in
early_amd_iommu_init(). I will do a patch-set on-top of this for v5.13
which does more cleanups.

Thanks,

	Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-17 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17  9:10 [PATCH 0/3] iommu/amd: Fix booting with amd_iommu=off Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17  9:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/amd: Move Stoney Ridge check to detect_ivrs() Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17  9:10   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17  9:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd: Don't call early_amd_iommu_init() when AMD IOMMU is disabled Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17  9:10   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17 11:47   ` David Woodhouse
2021-03-17 11:47     ` David Woodhouse
2021-03-17 13:32     ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2021-03-17 13:32       ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17 13:37       ` David Woodhouse
2021-03-17 13:37         ` David Woodhouse
2021-03-17 14:24         ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17 14:24           ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17  9:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/amd: Keep track of amd_iommu_irq_remap state Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17  9:10   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-17 10:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] iommu/amd: Fix booting with amd_iommu=off Huang Rui
2021-03-17 10:48   ` Huang Rui
2021-03-18  9:47   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-18  9:47     ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YFIE8xnr/HWqxm4p@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xiaojian.du@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.