Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] xfs: stress test for shrinking free space in the last AG

From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] xfs: stress test for shrinking free space in the last AG
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:46:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGCy5W+4coMuM7y1@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315111926.837170-4-hsiangkao@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 07:19:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> This adds a stress testcase to shrink free space as much as
> possible in the last AG with background fsstress workload.
> 
> The expectation is that no crash happens with expected output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/991     | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/991.out |   8 +++
>  tests/xfs/group   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 131 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/991
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/991.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/991 b/tests/xfs/991
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..7e7d318e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/991
> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 991
> +#
> +# XFS online shrinkfs stress test
> +#
> +# This test attempts to shrink unused space as much as possible with
> +# background fsstress workload. It will decrease the shrink size if
> +# larger size fails. And totally repeat 2 * TIME_FACTOR times.
> +#
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +trap "rm -f $tmp.*; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +create_scratch()
> +{
> +	_scratch_mkfs_xfs $@ | tee -a $seqres.full | \
> +		_filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs >/dev/null
> +	. $tmp.mkfs
> +
> +	if ! _try_scratch_mount 2>/dev/null; then
> +		echo "failed to mount $SCRATCH_DEV"
> +		exit 1
> +	fi

_scratch_mount will do the check and _fail the test on mount failure.

> +
> +	# fix the reserve block pool to a known size so that the enospc
> +	# calculations work out correctly.
> +	_scratch_resvblks 1024 > /dev/null 2>&1
> +}
> +
> +fill_scratch()
> +{
> +	$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "falloc -k 0 $1" $SCRATCH_MNT/resvfile
> +}
> +
> +stress_scratch()
> +{
> +	procs=3
> +	nops=$((1000 * LOAD_FACTOR))

Declare procs and nops as local.

> +	# -w ensures that the only ops are ones which cause write I/O
> +	FSSTRESS_ARGS=`_scale_fsstress_args -d $SCRATCH_MNT -w -p $procs \
> +	    -n $nops $FSSTRESS_AVOID`
> +	$FSSTRESS_PROG $FSSTRESS_ARGS >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &

I think it's more explicit to run run stress_scratch in background,
instead run fsstress in background implicit.

> +}
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs

_require_scratch

> +_require_xfs_shrink
> +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | tee -a $seqres.full | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs
> +. $tmp.mkfs	# extract blocksize and data size for scratch device
> +
> +decsize=`expr  42 \* 1048576`	# shrink in chunks of this size at most
> +endsize=`expr 125 \* 1048576`	# stop after shrinking this big
> +[ `expr $endsize / $dbsize` -lt $dblocks ] || _notrun "Scratch device too small"
> +
> +nags=2
> +totalcount=$((2 * TIME_FACTOR))
> +
> +while [ $totalcount -gt 0 ]; do
> +	size=`expr 1010 \* 1048576`	# 1010 megabytes initially
> +	logblks=$(_scratch_find_xfs_min_logblocks -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags})
> +
> +	create_scratch -lsize=${logblks}b -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags}
> +
> +	for i in `seq 125 -1 90`; do
> +		fillsize=`expr $i \* 1048576`
> +		out="$(fill_scratch $fillsize 2>&1)"
> +		echo "$out" | grep -q 'No space left on device' && continue
> +		test -n "${out}" && echo "$out"
> +		break
> +	done
> +
> +	while [ $size -gt $endsize ]; do
> +		stress_scratch

So just call

stress_scratch &

here? So it's clear that we put stress_scratch in background, and the
'wait' below is waiting for it.

Thanks,
Eryu

> +		sleep 1
> +
> +		decb=`expr $decsize / $dbsize`    # in data blocks
> +		while [ $decb -gt 0 ]; do
> +			sizeb=`expr $size / $dbsize - $decb`
> +
> +			$XFS_GROWFS_PROG -D ${sizeb} $SCRATCH_MNT \
> +				>> $seqres.full 2>&1 && break
> +
> +			[ $decb -gt 100 ] && decb=`expr $decb + $RANDOM % 10`
> +			decb=`expr $decb / 2`
> +		done
> +
> +		wait
> +		[ $decb -eq 0 ] && break
> +
> +		# get latest dblocks
> +		$XFS_INFO_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.growfs >/dev/null
> +		. $tmp.growfs
> +
> +		size=`expr $dblocks \* $dbsize`
> +		_scratch_unmount
> +		_repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
> +		_scratch_mount
> +	done
> +
> +	_scratch_unmount
> +	_repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
> +	totalcount=`expr $totalcount - 1`
> +done
> +
> +echo "*** done"
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/991.out b/tests/xfs/991.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..e8209672
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/991.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +QA output created by 991
> +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> +data     = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> +         = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> +naming   =VERN bsize=XXX
> +log      =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> +*** done
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> index a7981b67..cf190b59 100644
> --- a/tests/xfs/group
> +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> @@ -526,3 +526,4 @@
>  526 auto quick mkfs
>  527 auto quick quota
>  990 auto quick growfs
> +991 auto growfs ioctl prealloc stress
> -- 
> 2.27.0