From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid())
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 10:19:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIUYG8N9T3/C/tSG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 04:11:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> I tested this patchset(plus arm32 change, like arm64 does) based on lts
> 5.10，add
>
> some debug log, the useful info shows below, if we enable HOLES_IN_ZONE, no
> panic,
>
> any idea, thanks.
Are there any changes on top of 5.10 except for pfn_valid() patch?
Do you see this panic on 5.10 without the changes?
Can you see stack backtrace beyond move_freepages_block?
> Zone ranges:
> Normal [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000b01fffff]
> HighMem [mem 0x00000000b0200000-0x00000000ffffefff]
> Movable zone start for each node
> Early memory node ranges
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000855fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000086a00000-0x0000000087dfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x000000008bd00000-0x000000008c4fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x000000008e300000-0x000000008ecfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000090d00000-0x00000000bfffffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000cc000000-0x00000000dc9fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000de700000-0x00000000de9fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000e0800000-0x00000000e0bfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000f4b00000-0x00000000f6ffffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000fda00000-0x00000000ffffefff]
>
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 85800, 85800000 end_pfn = 86a00, 86a00000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8c800, 8c800000 end_pfn = 8e300, 8e300000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8f000, 8f000000 end_pfn = 90000, 90000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dcc00, dcc00000 end_pfn = de700, de700000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dec00, dec00000 end_pfn = e0000, e0000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = e0c00, e0c00000 end_pfn = e4000, e4000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = f7000, f7000000 end_pfn = f8000, f8000000
> === >move_freepages: start_pfn/end_pfn [de601, de7ff], [de600000, de7ff000]
> : pfn =de600 pfn2phy = de600000 , page = ef3cc000, page-flags = ffffffff
> 8<--- cut here ---
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffe
> pgd = 5dd50df5
> [fffffffe] *pgd=affff861, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
> Internal error: Oops: 37 [#1] SMP ARM
> Modules linked in: gmac(O)
> CPU: 2 PID: 635 Comm: test-oom Tainted: G O 5.10.0+ #31
> Hardware name: Hisilicon A9
> PC is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
> LR is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
> pc : [<c02383a4>] lr : [<c02383a4>] psr: 200e0393
> sp : c4179cf8 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000001
> r10: c4179d58 r9 : 000de7ff r8 : 00000000
> r7 : c0863280 r6 : 000de600 r5 : 000de600 r4 : ef3cc000
> r3 : ffffffff r2 : 00000000 r1 : ef5d069c r0 : fffffffe
> Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
> Control: 1ac5387d Table: 83b0c04a DAC: 55555555
> Process test-oom (pid: 635, stack limit = 0x25d667df)
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid())
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 10:19:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIUYG8N9T3/C/tSG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 04:11:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> I tested this patchset(plus arm32 change, like arm64 does) based on lts
> 5.10，add
>
> some debug log, the useful info shows below, if we enable HOLES_IN_ZONE, no
> panic,
>
> any idea, thanks.
Are there any changes on top of 5.10 except for pfn_valid() patch?
Do you see this panic on 5.10 without the changes?
Can you see stack backtrace beyond move_freepages_block?
> Zone ranges:
> Normal [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000b01fffff]
> HighMem [mem 0x00000000b0200000-0x00000000ffffefff]
> Movable zone start for each node
> Early memory node ranges
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000855fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000086a00000-0x0000000087dfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x000000008bd00000-0x000000008c4fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x000000008e300000-0x000000008ecfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000090d00000-0x00000000bfffffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000cc000000-0x00000000dc9fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000de700000-0x00000000de9fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000e0800000-0x00000000e0bfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000f4b00000-0x00000000f6ffffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000fda00000-0x00000000ffffefff]
>
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 85800, 85800000 end_pfn = 86a00, 86a00000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8c800, 8c800000 end_pfn = 8e300, 8e300000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8f000, 8f000000 end_pfn = 90000, 90000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dcc00, dcc00000 end_pfn = de700, de700000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dec00, dec00000 end_pfn = e0000, e0000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = e0c00, e0c00000 end_pfn = e4000, e4000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = f7000, f7000000 end_pfn = f8000, f8000000
> === >move_freepages: start_pfn/end_pfn [de601, de7ff], [de600000, de7ff000]
> : pfn =de600 pfn2phy = de600000 , page = ef3cc000, page-flags = ffffffff
> 8<--- cut here ---
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffe
> pgd = 5dd50df5
> [fffffffe] *pgd=affff861, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
> Internal error: Oops: 37 [#1] SMP ARM
> Modules linked in: gmac(O)
> CPU: 2 PID: 635 Comm: test-oom Tainted: G O 5.10.0+ #31
> Hardware name: Hisilicon A9
> PC is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
> LR is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
> pc : [<c02383a4>] lr : [<c02383a4>] psr: 200e0393
> sp : c4179cf8 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000001
> r10: c4179d58 r9 : 000de7ff r8 : 00000000
> r7 : c0863280 r6 : 000de600 r5 : 000de600 r4 : ef3cc000
> r3 : ffffffff r2 : 00000000 r1 : ef5d069c r0 : fffffffe
> Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
> Control: 1ac5387d Table: 83b0c04a DAC: 55555555
> Process test-oom (pid: 635, stack limit = 0x25d667df)
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid())
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 10:19:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIUYG8N9T3/C/tSG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 04:11:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> I tested this patchset(plus arm32 change, like arm64 does) based on lts
> 5.10，add
>
> some debug log, the useful info shows below, if we enable HOLES_IN_ZONE, no
> panic,
>
> any idea, thanks.
Are there any changes on top of 5.10 except for pfn_valid() patch?
Do you see this panic on 5.10 without the changes?
Can you see stack backtrace beyond move_freepages_block?
> Zone ranges:
> Normal [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000b01fffff]
> HighMem [mem 0x00000000b0200000-0x00000000ffffefff]
> Movable zone start for each node
> Early memory node ranges
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000080a00000-0x00000000855fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000086a00000-0x0000000087dfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x000000008bd00000-0x000000008c4fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x000000008e300000-0x000000008ecfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x0000000090d00000-0x00000000bfffffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000cc000000-0x00000000dc9fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000de700000-0x00000000de9fffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000e0800000-0x00000000e0bfffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000f4b00000-0x00000000f6ffffff]
> node 0: [mem 0x00000000fda00000-0x00000000ffffefff]
>
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 85800, 85800000 end_pfn = 86a00, 86a00000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8c800, 8c800000 end_pfn = 8e300, 8e300000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = 8f000, 8f000000 end_pfn = 90000, 90000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dcc00, dcc00000 end_pfn = de700, de700000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = dec00, dec00000 end_pfn = e0000, e0000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = e0c00, e0c00000 end_pfn = e4000, e4000000
> ----> free_memmap, start_pfn = f7000, f7000000 end_pfn = f8000, f8000000
> === >move_freepages: start_pfn/end_pfn [de601, de7ff], [de600000, de7ff000]
> : pfn =de600 pfn2phy = de600000 , page = ef3cc000, page-flags = ffffffff
> 8<--- cut here ---
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffe
> pgd = 5dd50df5
> [fffffffe] *pgd=affff861, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
> Internal error: Oops: 37 [#1] SMP ARM
> Modules linked in: gmac(O)
> CPU: 2 PID: 635 Comm: test-oom Tainted: G O 5.10.0+ #31
> Hardware name: Hisilicon A9
> PC is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
> LR is at move_freepages_block+0x150/0x278
> pc : [<c02383a4>] lr : [<c02383a4>] psr: 200e0393
> sp : c4179cf8 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000001
> r10: c4179d58 r9 : 000de7ff r8 : 00000000
> r7 : c0863280 r6 : 000de600 r5 : 000de600 r4 : ef3cc000
> r3 : ffffffff r2 : 00000000 r1 : ef5d069c r0 : fffffffe
> Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
> Control: 1ac5387d Table: 83b0c04a DAC: 55555555
> Process test-oom (pid: 635, stack limit = 0x25d667df)
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-25 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 143+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 6:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 10:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 10:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 10:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 10:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 10:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 10:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 10:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 12:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 12:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 13:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 13:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 11:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 11:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 11:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 12:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 12:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 13:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 13:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-22 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22 7:00 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22 7:00 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22 7:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-22 7:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-22 7:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-22 15:28 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22 15:28 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22 15:28 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-23 8:11 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-23 8:11 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-23 8:11 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-25 7:19 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-04-25 7:19 ` arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid()) Mike Rapoport
2021-04-25 7:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-25 7:51 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-25 7:51 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-26 5:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-26 5:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-26 5:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-26 15:26 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-26 15:26 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-26 15:26 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-27 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-27 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-27 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-27 11:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-27 11:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-27 11:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-28 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-28 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-28 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 0:48 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-29 0:48 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-29 0:48 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-29 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 10:22 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-29 10:22 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-29 10:22 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-30 9:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-30 9:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-30 9:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-30 11:24 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-30 11:24 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-30 11:24 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-03 6:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03 6:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03 6:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-03 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-03 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-03 8:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03 8:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03 8:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-06 12:47 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-06 12:47 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-06 12:47 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 7:17 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 7:17 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 7:17 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 10:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-07 10:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-07 10:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-07 12:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 12:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 12:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-10 3:10 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-10 3:10 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-10 3:10 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-11 8:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 8:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 8:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 3:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 3:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 3:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 8:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 8:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 8:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 3:44 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-13 3:44 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-13 3:44 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-13 10:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 10:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 10:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14 2:18 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-14 2:18 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-14 2:18 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 3:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-12 3:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-12 3:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-25 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-25 6:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-25 6:59 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YIUYG8N9T3/C/tSG@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.