All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, psodagud@codeaurora.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: core: Move validate before device add
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 22:44:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLBnIDrNVVePv3gZ@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621284349-22752-3-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org>

On Mon 17 May 15:45 CDT 2021, Siddharth Gupta wrote:

> We can validate whether the remoteproc is correctly setup before
> calling making the cdev_add and device_add calls. This saves us
> the trouble of cleaning up later on.
> 

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 562355a..45d09bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -2316,16 +2316,16 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	/* add char device for this remoteproc */
> -	ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
> +	ret = rproc_validate(rproc);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = device_add(dev);
> +	/* add char device for this remoteproc */
> +	ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = rproc_validate(rproc);
> +	ret = device_add(dev);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, psodagud@codeaurora.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: core: Move validate before device add
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 22:44:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLBnIDrNVVePv3gZ@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621284349-22752-3-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org>

On Mon 17 May 15:45 CDT 2021, Siddharth Gupta wrote:

> We can validate whether the remoteproc is correctly setup before
> calling making the cdev_add and device_add calls. This saves us
> the trouble of cleaning up later on.
> 

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 562355a..45d09bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -2316,16 +2316,16 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	/* add char device for this remoteproc */
> -	ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
> +	ret = rproc_validate(rproc);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = device_add(dev);
> +	/* add char device for this remoteproc */
> +	ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = rproc_validate(rproc);
> +	ret = device_add(dev);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-28  3:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 20:45 [PATCH 0/3] remoteproc: core: Fixes for rproc cdev and add Siddharth Gupta
2021-05-17 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: core: Move cdev add before device add Siddharth Gupta
2021-05-28  3:43   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-28  3:43     ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-17 20:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: core: Move validate " Siddharth Gupta
2021-05-28  3:44   ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2021-05-28  3:44     ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-17 20:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: core: Cleanup device in case of failure Siddharth Gupta
2021-05-28  3:50   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-28  3:50     ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLBnIDrNVVePv3gZ@builder.lan \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.