From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: soc@kernel.org
Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/3] Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() for smartreflex for v5.15
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:54:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRTT0Oejj22qNAL+@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull-1628751694-126144@atomide.com-2>
Hi,
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [210812 07:04]:
> From: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>
>
> The following changes since commit fdc07ca0724dd8ad00c22909a1464dc73ed6783e:
>
> Merge branch 'omap-for-v5.14/ti-sysc' into omap-for-v5.15/ti-sysc (2021-07-27 12:02:24 +0300)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap tags/omap-for-v5.15/sr-signed
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 74953a9136cfd650dd994daded520528f737b7b3:
>
> soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex (2021-08-06 09:53:59 +0300)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex for v5.15
>
> We now have cleard pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for all TI SoCs
> in Linux next except for smartreflex and 8250_omap. This change
> removes pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex, the
> 8250_omap depends on pending serial layer PM changes.
Looks like Santosh already queued up this patch and sent a pull request,
so my pull request for this change can be just ignored.
Regrds,
Tony
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Tony Lindgren (1):
> soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex
>
> drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
> include/linux/power/smartreflex.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: soc@kernel.org
Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/3] Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() for smartreflex for v5.15
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:54:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRTT0Oejj22qNAL+@atomide.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20210812075456.ua7Lfr60FIpw3RrHkBMzPlJLytCaNtEBTubyEhk_9EE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull-1628751694-126144@atomide.com-2>
Hi,
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [210812 07:04]:
> From: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>
>
> The following changes since commit fdc07ca0724dd8ad00c22909a1464dc73ed6783e:
>
> Merge branch 'omap-for-v5.14/ti-sysc' into omap-for-v5.15/ti-sysc (2021-07-27 12:02:24 +0300)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap tags/omap-for-v5.15/sr-signed
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 74953a9136cfd650dd994daded520528f737b7b3:
>
> soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex (2021-08-06 09:53:59 +0300)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex for v5.15
>
> We now have cleard pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for all TI SoCs
> in Linux next except for smartreflex and 8250_omap. This change
> removes pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex, the
> 8250_omap depends on pending serial layer PM changes.
Looks like Santosh already queued up this patch and sent a pull request,
so my pull request for this change can be just ignored.
Regrds,
Tony
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Tony Lindgren (1):
> soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex
>
> drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
> include/linux/power/smartreflex.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 7:03 [GIT PULL 1/3] Two missed omap Kconfig patches for v5.15 Tony Lindgren
2021-08-12 7:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-08-12 7:03 ` [GIT PULL 2/3] Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() for smartreflex " Tony Lindgren
2021-08-12 7:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-08-12 7:54 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2021-08-12 7:54 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-08-12 20:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-12 20:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-12 7:03 ` [GIT PULL 3/3] Changes for am3 cpsw and SanCloud " Tony Lindgren
2021-08-12 7:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-08-12 21:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-12 21:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-12 20:41 ` [GIT PULL 1/3] Two missed omap Kconfig patches " Arnd Bergmann
2021-08-12 20:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRTT0Oejj22qNAL+@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.