All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@antgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 03/10] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in functions reserve_crashkernel()
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:07:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbseAX6X1VHUF12f@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9513d74c-d4c7-babd-f823-8999e195d96d@huawei.com>

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:46:12AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> The original value (1ULL << 32) is inaccurate

I keep asking *why*?

> and it enlarged the CRASH_ADDR_LOW upper limit.

$ git grep -E "CRASH_ADDR_LOW\W"
$

I have no clue what you mean here.

> This is because when the memory is allocated from the low end, the
> address cannot exceed CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, see "if (!high)" branch.

> If
> the memory is allocated from the high end, 'crash_base' is greater than or
> equal to (1ULL << 32), and naturally, it is greater than CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX.
> 
> I think I should update the description, thanks.

I think you should explain why is (1ULL << 32) wrong.

It came from:

  eb6db83d1059 ("x86/setup: Do not reserve crashkernel high memory if low reservation failed")

which simply frees the high memory portion when the low reservation
fails. And the test for that is, is crash base > 4G. So that makes
perfect sense to me.

So your change is a NOP on 64-bit and it is a NOP on 32-bit by virtue of
the _low() variant always returning 0 on 32-bit.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@antgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 03/10] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in functions reserve_crashkernel()
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:07:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbseAX6X1VHUF12f@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9513d74c-d4c7-babd-f823-8999e195d96d@huawei.com>

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:46:12AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> The original value (1ULL << 32) is inaccurate

I keep asking *why*?

> and it enlarged the CRASH_ADDR_LOW upper limit.

$ git grep -E "CRASH_ADDR_LOW\W"
$

I have no clue what you mean here.

> This is because when the memory is allocated from the low end, the
> address cannot exceed CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, see "if (!high)" branch.

> If
> the memory is allocated from the high end, 'crash_base' is greater than or
> equal to (1ULL << 32), and naturally, it is greater than CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX.
> 
> I think I should update the description, thanks.

I think you should explain why is (1ULL << 32) wrong.

It came from:

  eb6db83d1059 ("x86/setup: Do not reserve crashkernel high memory if low reservation failed")

which simply frees the high memory portion when the low reservation
fails. And the test for that is, is crash base > 4G. So that makes
perfect sense to me.

So your change is a NOP on 64-bit and it is a NOP on 32-bit by virtue of
the _low() variant always returning 0 on 32-bit.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@antgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 03/10] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in functions reserve_crashkernel()
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:07:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbseAX6X1VHUF12f@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9513d74c-d4c7-babd-f823-8999e195d96d@huawei.com>

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:46:12AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> The original value (1ULL << 32) is inaccurate

I keep asking *why*?

> and it enlarged the CRASH_ADDR_LOW upper limit.

$ git grep -E "CRASH_ADDR_LOW\W"
$

I have no clue what you mean here.

> This is because when the memory is allocated from the low end, the
> address cannot exceed CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, see "if (!high)" branch.

> If
> the memory is allocated from the high end, 'crash_base' is greater than or
> equal to (1ULL << 32), and naturally, it is greater than CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX.
> 
> I think I should update the description, thanks.

I think you should explain why is (1ULL << 32) wrong.

It came from:

  eb6db83d1059 ("x86/setup: Do not reserve crashkernel high memory if low reservation failed")

which simply frees the high memory portion when the low reservation
fails. And the test for that is, is crash base > 4G. So that makes
perfect sense to me.

So your change is a NOP on 64-bit and it is a NOP on 32-bit by virtue of
the _low() variant always returning 0 on 32-bit.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-16 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 198+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10  6:55 [PATCH v17 00/10] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55 ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 01/10] x86: kdump: replace the hard-coded alignment with macro CRASH_ALIGN Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 13:17   ` Baoquan He
2021-12-13 13:17     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-13 13:17     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14  8:41     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14  8:41       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14  8:41       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-13 14:26   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:26     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:26     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 19:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-13 19:54     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-13 19:54     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14  9:27     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14  9:27       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14  9:27       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 02/10] x86: kdump: make the lower bound of crash kernel reservation consistent Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 13:37   ` Baoquan He
2021-12-13 13:37     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-13 13:37     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14  8:48     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14  8:48       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14  8:48       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-13 14:27   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:27     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:27     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-14 19:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14 19:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14 19:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14 19:24     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-14 19:24       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-14 19:24       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-15  2:10       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15  2:10         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15  2:10         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15  3:42       ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15  3:42         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15  3:42         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15 11:01         ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-15 11:01           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-15 11:01           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-15 11:16           ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15 11:16             ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15 11:16             ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15 11:45             ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15 11:45               ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15 11:45               ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 03/10] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in functions reserve_crashkernel() Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 14:28   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:28     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:28     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-14  8:54   ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14  8:54     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14  8:54     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14  9:38     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14  9:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14  9:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14  9:56       ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14  9:56         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14  9:56         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14 14:24         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14 14:24           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-14 14:24           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-15  6:01           ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15  6:01             ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15  6:01             ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15 13:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-15 13:28     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-15 13:28     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16  1:10     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-16  1:10       ` Baoquan He
2021-12-16  1:10       ` Baoquan He
2021-12-16  2:46       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16  2:46         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16  2:46         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 11:07         ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-12-16 11:07           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 11:07           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 12:08           ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 12:08             ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 12:08             ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 12:23             ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 12:23               ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 12:23               ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 14:48             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 14:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 14:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-17  2:51               ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-17  2:51                 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-17  2:51                 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-21 22:23                 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-21 22:23                   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-21 22:23                   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 10:55       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 10:55         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 10:55         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 14:11         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-16 14:11           ` Baoquan He
2021-12-16 14:11           ` Baoquan He
2021-12-16 14:58           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 14:58             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 14:58             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 04/10] x86: kdump: move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch() Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 14:29   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:29     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:29     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-14 11:40   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14 11:40     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14 11:40     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15  8:56     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15  8:56       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15  8:56       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-15  9:22       ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15  9:22         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-15  9:22         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 05/10] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel[_low]() into crash_core.c Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 14:30   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:30     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:30     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-14 10:45   ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14 10:45     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14 10:45     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-14 12:38     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14 12:38       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-14 12:38       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 11:17   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 11:17     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 11:17     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 13:15     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 13:15       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 13:15       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-12-16 14:51       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 14:51         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 14:51         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 06/10] arm64: kdump: introduce some macros for crash kernel reservation Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 14:30   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:30     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:30     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 07/10] arm64: kdump: reimplement crashkernel=X Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 14:31   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:31     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:31     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 08/10] of: fdt: Aggregate the processing of "linux,usable-memory-range" Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` [PATCH v17 08/10] of: fdt: Aggregate the processing of "linux, usable-memory-range" Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10 16:39   ` [PATCH v17 08/10] of: fdt: Aggregate the processing of "linux,usable-memory-range" Rob Herring
2021-12-10 16:39     ` Rob Herring
2021-12-10 16:39     ` Rob Herring
2021-12-13 14:34   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:34     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:34     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 09/10] of: fdt: Add memory for devices by DT property "linux,usable-memory-range" Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` [PATCH v17 09/10] of: fdt: Add memory for devices by DT property "linux, usable-memory-range" Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10 16:43   ` [PATCH v17 09/10] of: fdt: Add memory for devices by DT property "linux,usable-memory-range" Rob Herring
2021-12-10 16:43     ` Rob Herring
2021-12-10 16:43     ` Rob Herring
2021-12-13 14:33   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:33     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:33     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-10  6:55 ` [PATCH v17 10/10] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-10  6:55   ` Zhen Lei
2021-12-13 14:34   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:34     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:34     ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-10  7:15 ` [PATCH v17 00/10] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Kefeng Wang
2021-12-10  7:15   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-12-10  7:15   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-12-13 18:50   ` Will Deacon
2021-12-13 18:50     ` Will Deacon
2021-12-13 18:50     ` Will Deacon
2021-12-13 14:37 ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:37   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 14:37   ` john.p.donnelly
2021-12-13 18:56   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-13 18:56     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-13 18:56     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-13 18:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-13 18:57     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-13 18:57     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YbseAX6X1VHUF12f@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dingguo.cz@antgroup.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.